Unifying Empathy over Predetermined Unity: Jiao Xun 焦循 (1763–1820) on the “Unifying Thread” of Confucius’ Teachings

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES T'oung Pao Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1163/15685322-10901004
S. Moores
{"title":"Unifying Empathy over Predetermined Unity: Jiao Xun 焦循 (1763–1820) on the “Unifying Thread” of Confucius’ Teachings","authors":"S. Moores","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10901004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article analyses an innovative reinterpretation of Analects 4/15 by the mid-Qing Confucian scholar Jiao Xun 焦循 (1763–1820), in his Comprehensive Explanation of the Analects (Lunyu tongshi 論語通釋) written in 1803. According to Jiao, the “unifying thread” (yiguan 一貫) of Confucius’ teachings had been misunderstood by generations of scholars, for whom it served as a sort of pre-defined standard against which to disparage differing philosophical perspectives. Jiao condemns such a tendency, arguing that it goes against the original intentions of Confucius and represents a hindrance to the interconnectedness with others that he considers to be the basis of Confucian values. Identifying the “unifying thread” with this very interconnectedness, Jiao argues that it is only by overcoming self-interest that one is able to develop the cognitive and moral capacity to place the other at the center of humanness and consideration.","PeriodicalId":23193,"journal":{"name":"T'oung Pao","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T'oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10901004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses an innovative reinterpretation of Analects 4/15 by the mid-Qing Confucian scholar Jiao Xun 焦循 (1763–1820), in his Comprehensive Explanation of the Analects (Lunyu tongshi 論語通釋) written in 1803. According to Jiao, the “unifying thread” (yiguan 一貫) of Confucius’ teachings had been misunderstood by generations of scholars, for whom it served as a sort of pre-defined standard against which to disparage differing philosophical perspectives. Jiao condemns such a tendency, arguing that it goes against the original intentions of Confucius and represents a hindrance to the interconnectedness with others that he considers to be the basis of Confucian values. Identifying the “unifying thread” with this very interconnectedness, Jiao argues that it is only by overcoming self-interest that one is able to develop the cognitive and moral capacity to place the other at the center of humanness and consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统一移情于预定的统一:焦勋论孔子学说的“统一脉络”
本文分析了清朝中期儒家学者焦勋(1763-1820)在1803年写的《论语通论》中对《论语》4/15的创新重新解释。根据焦教授的说法,孔子学说的“一统”被一代又一代的学者误解了,对他们来说,这是一种预定义的标准,用来贬低不同的哲学观点。焦谴责这种倾向,认为这违背了孔子的初衷,阻碍了他认为是儒家价值观基础的人与人之间的相互联系。焦认为,只有通过克服自身利益,一个人才能发展认知和道德能力,将他人置于人性和考虑的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
T'oung Pao
T'oung Pao ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Early Qing Compilation of the Ming History in Manchu: The Contexts, Contents, and Significance of the Ming gurun i suduri From Stone Canal to Orchid Terrace: Libraries and Archives in the Two Han Capitals Books of Fate and Popular Culture in Early China: The Daybook Manuscripts of the Warring States, Qin, and Han , by Donald Harper and Marc Kalinowski (eds.) The Penumbra of the Great Tang: Poetry from the Margins of the Empire at the Turn of the Eighth Century The Quanzhou Qianfo xinzhu zhuzushi song (Or.8210/S.1635): Manuscript, Textual History, and Genealogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1