Revistas contraculturales argentinas en dictadura y transición: debates alrededor del exilio.

Abstract

espanolDurante la ultima dictadura argentina (1976-1983), un conjunto de publicaciones culturales desafio los limites impuestos por el poder hegemonico militar en relacion con su propuesta de intervencion politico-cultural, su ubicacion en el mercado de los bienes simbolicos y el rescate de tradiciones que confrontaron con la denominada cultura oficial, entre otros aspectos. Por esta razon, recibieron la denominacion de revistas contraculturales, subterraneas o underground. A partir de 1978 y durante la denominada transicion argentina, dichas publicaciones polemizaron con aquellas intervenciones que, desde el exilio, identificaron la produccion cultural de quienes permanecieron desde la inaccion, la quietud y el silencio. El exilio y la permanencia implicaron la construccion de redes de solidaridad en torno a padecer y denunciar los mecanismos de censura, prohibicion y persecucion del regimen militar. Sin embargo, tambien se establecio una serie de tensiones entre el “adentro” y el “afuera”, que nos proponemos reponer en este articulo EnglishDuring the last Argentine dictatorship (1976-1983), a group of cultural magazines challenged the restrictions imposed by hegemonic military power through their proposal of politic and cultural intervention, their place in the symbolic market and the recovery of traditions that contended against the so-called official culture, among other things. Consequently, they came to be designated as countercultu-ral or underground magazines. Since 1978 and during the so-called Argentine transition, those magazines engaged in a dispute with those manifestations that, form the exile, equated their cultural production of those people who remained with the inaction, the stillness, and the silent. Between the exile and those who remained in the country, a solidarity network was established based on the suffering and denunciation of the military regime’s censorship, prohibition, and persecution. But also a series of tensions between “inside” and “outside”, which we intend to revisit in this paper, was established