“One Metric to Rule Them All”: A Common Metric for Symptoms of Depression and Generalized Anxiety in Adolescent Samples

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1177/21677026231168564
M. Sunderland, Nicholas Olsen, Rachel Visontay, C. Chapman, Louise Mewton, L. Stapinski, N. Newton, M. Teesson, T. Slade
{"title":"“One Metric to Rule Them All”: A Common Metric for Symptoms of Depression and Generalized Anxiety in Adolescent Samples","authors":"M. Sunderland, Nicholas Olsen, Rachel Visontay, C. Chapman, Louise Mewton, L. Stapinski, N. Newton, M. Teesson, T. Slade","doi":"10.1177/21677026231168564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a significant degree of heterogeneity in scales that purport to measure depression and generalized anxiety in adolescent samples, which makes it difficult to directly compare scores across studies. The aim of the current study is to develop a common metric that facilitates the comparison of scores from different but related scales of depression and generalized anxiety using a large adolescent sample. A nonequivalent-anchor-test design in conjunction with simultaneous calibration was used to equate and develop a common metric for six different scales. The common metric provided scores with acceptable levels of precision across the −1 to 3 range on θ, which represents the more severe and often clinical end of the spectrum. Thus, in the current study, we identified a coherent common metric that is closely aligned with the “distress” subfactor of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology model. Additional validation testing in independent samples is now required.","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231168564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a significant degree of heterogeneity in scales that purport to measure depression and generalized anxiety in adolescent samples, which makes it difficult to directly compare scores across studies. The aim of the current study is to develop a common metric that facilitates the comparison of scores from different but related scales of depression and generalized anxiety using a large adolescent sample. A nonequivalent-anchor-test design in conjunction with simultaneous calibration was used to equate and develop a common metric for six different scales. The common metric provided scores with acceptable levels of precision across the −1 to 3 range on θ, which represents the more severe and often clinical end of the spectrum. Thus, in the current study, we identified a coherent common metric that is closely aligned with the “distress” subfactor of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology model. Additional validation testing in independent samples is now required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一个指标统治他们所有”:青少年样本中抑郁和广泛性焦虑症状的共同指标
在旨在测量青少年样本中抑郁和广泛性焦虑的量表中,存在显著程度的异质性,这使得很难直接比较不同研究的分数。当前研究的目的是开发一种通用的度量标准,以方便比较使用大量青少年样本的抑郁和广泛性焦虑的不同但相关的量表的得分。非等效锚试验设计与同步校准相结合,用于等同和开发六个不同尺度的公共度量。常用的度量标准在θ的- 1到3范围内提供了可接受的精度水平,这代表了更严重的临床症状。因此,在当前的研究中,我们确定了一个与精神病理学分层分类法模型的“痛苦”子因素密切相关的连贯的公共度量。现在需要在独立样品中进行额外的验证测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
期刊最新文献
Testing a Reward-Processing Model of Negative Urgency in Women With and Without Binge Eating Bias in the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder Among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Persons: Results From a Vignette-Based Experiment Opening the Black Box: The Underlying Working Mechanisms in Virtual-Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders A Bayesian Longitudinal Network Analysis of Panic-Disorder Symptoms and Respiratory Biomarkers Additive Benefits of Individual, Relational, and Community Factors on Physical- and Mental-Health Trajectories Among Black Americans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1