Analysis of dosimetric verification results of stereotactic body radiotherapy

Xile Zhang, R. Yang, Jun Li, Daojian An, Jiaqi Li, Junjie Wang
{"title":"Analysis of dosimetric verification results of stereotactic body radiotherapy","authors":"Xile Zhang, R. Yang, Jun Li, Daojian An, Jiaqi Li, Junjie Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the patient-specific dosimetric verification result of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, and to investigate the sensitivity of the result to three factors: interpolation of measured data, size of dose calculation grid and assessment threshold. \n \n \nMethods \nThe dosimetric verification results of SBRT plans of 50 patients were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the impact of the following factors. The linear interpolation (1.00 mm) and non-interpolation (7.62 mm) were applied to measured data respectively. Three dose calculation grid sizes of Eclipse planning system, i. e., 1.0 mm, 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm were compared respectively. The threshold of dose assessment was selected as 10%, 20% and 30%, respectively. Three criteria of γ analysis were selected: 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm. \n \n \nResults \nUnder criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, the average γ passing rates were (86.3±7.3)% and (93.7±5.6)%, (94.1±4.4)% and(97.7±3.9)%, (97.7 ±2.2)% and (99.1±1.7)%, respectively, with and without linear interpolation. Relative to the 1.0 mm reference grid, the grids of 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm significantly decreased γ passing rates by 3.8%, 1.9%, 0.8% (t=8.41, 9.06, 5.30, P<0.05) and by 6.5%, 6.0%, 3.5% (t=-13.76, -13.15, -9.80, P<0.05) under criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. Relative to the 10% reference threshold, the shresholds of 20% and 30% significantly decreased γ passing rates by 2.4%, 1.0%, 0.6%(t=-8.60, -5.86, -4.68, P<0.05) and by 4.0%, 1.7%, 0.9% (t=-9.45, -6.66, -5.06, P<0.05) under criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nInterpolation, dose calculation grid size and dose assessment threshold are influential factors of dose verification result, and need to be considered during dosimetric verification of stereotactic radiotherapy patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nStereotactic body radiotherapy; Dosimetric verification; Interpolation; Dose calculation grid size; Dose assessment threshold","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"13 1","pages":"680-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To analyze the patient-specific dosimetric verification result of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, and to investigate the sensitivity of the result to three factors: interpolation of measured data, size of dose calculation grid and assessment threshold. Methods The dosimetric verification results of SBRT plans of 50 patients were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the impact of the following factors. The linear interpolation (1.00 mm) and non-interpolation (7.62 mm) were applied to measured data respectively. Three dose calculation grid sizes of Eclipse planning system, i. e., 1.0 mm, 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm were compared respectively. The threshold of dose assessment was selected as 10%, 20% and 30%, respectively. Three criteria of γ analysis were selected: 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm. Results Under criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, the average γ passing rates were (86.3±7.3)% and (93.7±5.6)%, (94.1±4.4)% and(97.7±3.9)%, (97.7 ±2.2)% and (99.1±1.7)%, respectively, with and without linear interpolation. Relative to the 1.0 mm reference grid, the grids of 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm significantly decreased γ passing rates by 3.8%, 1.9%, 0.8% (t=8.41, 9.06, 5.30, P<0.05) and by 6.5%, 6.0%, 3.5% (t=-13.76, -13.15, -9.80, P<0.05) under criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. Relative to the 10% reference threshold, the shresholds of 20% and 30% significantly decreased γ passing rates by 2.4%, 1.0%, 0.6%(t=-8.60, -5.86, -4.68, P<0.05) and by 4.0%, 1.7%, 0.9% (t=-9.45, -6.66, -5.06, P<0.05) under criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. Conclusions Interpolation, dose calculation grid size and dose assessment threshold are influential factors of dose verification result, and need to be considered during dosimetric verification of stereotactic radiotherapy patients. Key words: Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Dosimetric verification; Interpolation; Dose calculation grid size; Dose assessment threshold
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向放射治疗剂量学验证结果分析
目的分析立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)方案患者特异性剂量学验证结果,探讨结果对测量数据插值、剂量计算网格大小和评估阈值三个因素的敏感性。方法回顾性分析50例患者SBRT计划的剂量学验证结果,评价以下因素的影响。测量数据分别采用线性插值(1.00 mm)和非插值(7.62 mm)处理。比较Eclipse规划系统中1.0 mm、2.5 mm和4.0 mm三种剂量计算网格尺寸。剂量评估阈值分别为10%、20%和30%。γ分析选择了三个标准:2%/ 2mm、3%/ 2mm和3%/ 3mm。结果在2%/ 2mm、3%/ 2mm和3%/ 3mm标准下,加线性插值和不加线性插值的γ平均合格率分别为(86.3±7.3)%和(93.7±5.6)%、(94.1±4.4)%和(97.7±3.9)%、(97.7±2.2)%和(99.1±1.7)%。与1.0 mm栅格相比,2.5 mm栅格和4.0 mm栅格在2%/2 mm、3%/2 mm和3%/3 mm标准下的γ通过率分别显著降低3.8%、1.9%、0.8% (t=8.41、9.06、5.30,P<0.05)和6.5%、6.0%、3.5% (t=-13.76、-13.15、-9.80,P<0.05)。在2%/2 mm、3%/2 mm和3%/3 mm标准下,20%和30%阈值分别显著降低了2.4%、1.0%、0.6%(t=-8.60、-5.86、-4.68,P<0.05)和4.0%、1.7%、0.9% (t=-9.45、-6.66、-5.06,P<0.05)的γ通过率。结论插值、剂量计算网格大小和剂量评估阈值是影响剂量验证结果的因素,在对立体定向放疗患者进行剂量学验证时需要考虑。关键词:立体定向放射治疗;剂量测定的鉴证;插值;剂量计算网格尺寸;剂量评估阈值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Infection control status of novel coronavirus pneumonia and radiation safety at CT workplace Current status of the application of radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy resources in Huai'an City in 2020 The application value of low-dose CT scan in pregnant women with COVID-19 Eeffects of tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose of paranasal sinus CT examination Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1