Perinatal Psychosocial Assessment-What are the Views of Health Professionals Working in the Private Obstetric Sector?

Tanya Connell
{"title":"Perinatal Psychosocial Assessment-What are the Views of Health Professionals Working in the Private Obstetric Sector?","authors":"Tanya Connell","doi":"10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Women are not universally or routinely screened ante-or postnatally for psychosocial risk factors, depression and anxiety in the private sector in Australia. There are limited studies that explore health professionals’ views on screening or perceived barriers to the screening process. Aim: The aim of this study was to discuss the health professionals’ views of psychosocial screening and assessment who work in the private obstetric sector. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were completed with 11 midwives, 1 social worker and 2 obstetricians. Three hospital sites were chosen, of which only one currently screens women for psychosocial risk factors. Thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Three researchers then discussed reoccurring themes and a consensus in themes and subthemes was reached. Results: Only one hospital was screening women and had midwives trained in psychosocial assessment including depression screening. There were mixed views on the process and barriers to screening were identified, e.g. lack of support systems, cultural barriers, inaccurate answers, power barriers with obstetricians, husband interference, fear and powerlessness. Benefits were recognised: early identification of difficulties, standardisation and patient-focused care. Concerns were, however, also evident: suicide ideation, intrusiveness of questions, whether women responded honestly, not wanting to screen all women. Conclusion: There was an identified concern by midwives that obstetricians did not take seriously any concerns highlighted by the midwife about women’s psychosocial problems. There was a sense of a lack of ‘ownership’ of the women, therefore a feeling of helplessness in addressing their needs. Suggestions were made: appropriate education and training of midwives, flagging high risk women, more in-house resources and external resources/community links and employing a central midwife with interest and expertise in psychosocial screening.","PeriodicalId":74017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health and development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women are not universally or routinely screened ante-or postnatally for psychosocial risk factors, depression and anxiety in the private sector in Australia. There are limited studies that explore health professionals’ views on screening or perceived barriers to the screening process. Aim: The aim of this study was to discuss the health professionals’ views of psychosocial screening and assessment who work in the private obstetric sector. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were completed with 11 midwives, 1 social worker and 2 obstetricians. Three hospital sites were chosen, of which only one currently screens women for psychosocial risk factors. Thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Three researchers then discussed reoccurring themes and a consensus in themes and subthemes was reached. Results: Only one hospital was screening women and had midwives trained in psychosocial assessment including depression screening. There were mixed views on the process and barriers to screening were identified, e.g. lack of support systems, cultural barriers, inaccurate answers, power barriers with obstetricians, husband interference, fear and powerlessness. Benefits were recognised: early identification of difficulties, standardisation and patient-focused care. Concerns were, however, also evident: suicide ideation, intrusiveness of questions, whether women responded honestly, not wanting to screen all women. Conclusion: There was an identified concern by midwives that obstetricians did not take seriously any concerns highlighted by the midwife about women’s psychosocial problems. There was a sense of a lack of ‘ownership’ of the women, therefore a feeling of helplessness in addressing their needs. Suggestions were made: appropriate education and training of midwives, flagging high risk women, more in-house resources and external resources/community links and employing a central midwife with interest and expertise in psychosocial screening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期社会心理评估——在私营产科部门工作的卫生专业人员有什么看法?
背景:在澳大利亚的私营部门,妇女没有普遍或常规地在产前或产后进行心理社会风险因素、抑郁和焦虑的筛查。有有限的研究探讨卫生专业人员对筛查的看法或对筛查过程的感知障碍。目的:本研究的目的是讨论在私营产科部门工作的卫生专业人员对社会心理筛查和评估的看法。方法:对11名助产士、1名社工和2名产科医生进行半结构化的面对面访谈。选择了三家医院,其中只有一家目前对妇女进行心理社会风险因素筛查。访谈笔录采用专题分析。然后,三位研究者讨论了重复出现的主题,并在主题和副主题上达成了共识。结果:只有一家医院对妇女进行了筛查,并且助产士接受了心理社会评估(包括抑郁症筛查)方面的培训。人们对筛查过程的看法不一,并确定了筛查的障碍,例如缺乏支持系统、文化障碍、不准确的答案、与产科医生的权力障碍、丈夫干预、恐惧和无能为力。好处是公认的:及早发现困难,标准化和以病人为中心的护理。然而,担忧也很明显:自杀念头、问题的侵入性、女性是否诚实回答、不想筛查所有女性。结论:助产士有一个明确的担忧,即产科医生没有认真对待助产士强调的关于妇女心理社会问题的任何担忧。有一种对女性缺乏“所有权”的感觉,因此在满足她们的需求时感到无助。提出了以下建议:对助产士进行适当的教育和培训,标记高风险妇女,增加内部资源和外部资源/社区联系,雇用对社会心理筛查感兴趣和具有专业知识的中心助产士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Clinical Study on Short-Term Efficacy of Pelvic Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Pelvic Muscle Biofeedback on Female Idiopathic Overactive Bladder. Placental Fatty Acid Metabolism and Transport in a Rat Model of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Prediction of Ovarian Cancer Survival using Machine Learning: A Population-Based Study A Principal Component Analysis of Nursing Students’ Satisfaction with Blended E-learning following the Covid-19 Pandemic Diagnosis , Management of Polycystic ovarian syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1