Ammonia for Industrial Combustion

S. Londerville, Matt Whelan, C. Baukal, Ali Gueniche, Michel Haag, P. Newman
{"title":"Ammonia for Industrial Combustion","authors":"S. Londerville, Matt Whelan, C. Baukal, Ali Gueniche, Michel Haag, P. Newman","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-96499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many companies are investigating switching from conventional fossil fuels to “green” fuels such as hydrogen to reduce CO2 emissions. This assumes hydrogen is made by an environmentally-friendly method such as electrolysis using renewable energy. However, there are concerns with hydrogen. For example, it leaks very easily, is extremely flammable, and is more difficult to transport than other fuels.\n A potential solution is to use ammonia as an alternative method of supplying hydrogen to a combustion process, assuming it is made in an environmentally-friendly manner. Like H2, ammonia also does not produce any carbon-containing pollutants such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or soot. It has transport properties like propane, so it is easier to contain and transport than hydrogen.\n However, there are some concerns with ammonia. It is a caustic and hazardous chemical with a pungent odor so it must be handled accordingly. It has the potential to generate very high levels of NOx which means a post-treatment system like an SCR may be required. Existing burners may need to be modified or replaced.\n While ammonia is a potentially important future green fuel, there are concerns that require attention and further research. This paper compares methane, hydrogen, and ammonia combustion and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of ammonia in particular.","PeriodicalId":23629,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: Energy","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-96499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many companies are investigating switching from conventional fossil fuels to “green” fuels such as hydrogen to reduce CO2 emissions. This assumes hydrogen is made by an environmentally-friendly method such as electrolysis using renewable energy. However, there are concerns with hydrogen. For example, it leaks very easily, is extremely flammable, and is more difficult to transport than other fuels. A potential solution is to use ammonia as an alternative method of supplying hydrogen to a combustion process, assuming it is made in an environmentally-friendly manner. Like H2, ammonia also does not produce any carbon-containing pollutants such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or soot. It has transport properties like propane, so it is easier to contain and transport than hydrogen. However, there are some concerns with ammonia. It is a caustic and hazardous chemical with a pungent odor so it must be handled accordingly. It has the potential to generate very high levels of NOx which means a post-treatment system like an SCR may be required. Existing burners may need to be modified or replaced. While ammonia is a potentially important future green fuel, there are concerns that require attention and further research. This paper compares methane, hydrogen, and ammonia combustion and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of ammonia in particular.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业燃烧用氨
许多公司正在研究从传统化石燃料转向氢等“绿色”燃料,以减少二氧化碳排放。这是假设氢气是通过一种环保的方法制造的,比如使用可再生能源的电解。然而,人们对氢也有担忧。例如,它很容易泄漏,非常易燃,比其他燃料更难运输。一个潜在的解决方案是使用氨作为向燃烧过程提供氢气的替代方法,假设它是以一种环保的方式制造的。像H2一样,氨也不会产生任何含碳的污染物,如一氧化碳、二氧化碳或煤烟。它有像丙烷一样的输运特性,所以它比氢更容易容纳和输运。然而,有一些关于氨的担忧。它是一种具有刺激性气味的腐蚀性危险化学品,因此必须进行相应的处理。它有可能产生非常高水平的氮氧化物,这意味着可能需要像SCR这样的后处理系统。现有的燃烧器可能需要修改或更换。虽然氨是一种潜在的重要的未来绿色燃料,但仍存在需要关注和进一步研究的问题。本文对甲烷燃烧、氢气燃烧和氨燃烧进行了比较,并着重讨论了氨燃烧的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ammonia for Industrial Combustion A Method to Account for the Effects of Thermal Osmosis in PEM Fuel Cells Optimization of Supercritical CO2 Cycle Combined With ORC for Waste Heat Recovery Improving the Yield of Biodiesel Production Using Waste Vegetable Oil Considering the Free Fatty Acid Content Flame Propagation Analysis of Anhydrous and Hydrous Ethanol in an Optical Spark Ignition Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1