A literature review of DEA efficiency methodology in defence sector

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion Pub Date : 2020-10-20 DOI:10.1108/arla-11-2019-0228
José Solana Ibáñez, Manuel Caravaca Garratón, A. Soto Meca
{"title":"A literature review of DEA efficiency methodology in defence sector","authors":"José Solana Ibáñez, Manuel Caravaca Garratón, A. Soto Meca","doi":"10.1108/arla-11-2019-0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe improvement in the efficiency of public management leads to an increase in the quality of services, boosting confidence in institutions and thus generating a multiplier effect. This paper aims to update the literature on the data envelopment analysis (DEA), which uses a frontier methodology, for measuring the efficiency applied to the defence sector.Design/methodology/approachTwo main research areas are related through this study: Defence Economics and Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. The frontier methods for measuring technical efficiency are grouped into parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric. The DEA literature review in the selected sector allows to identify three main fields of work that are discussed in detail.FindingsExisting empirical research has hardly applied bootstrapping methods to remove bias from the estimates. No empirical work has applied an analysis of efficiency determinants by the inclusion of exogenous variables.Originality/valueThe managerial implications of efficiency are numerous. A line of research is proposed to examine the extent to which efficiency improvements have an impact on reputation and, therefore, on the image of and confidence in institutions. The link between Defence Economics and Corruption Economics is also considered.","PeriodicalId":45515,"journal":{"name":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-11-2019-0228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe improvement in the efficiency of public management leads to an increase in the quality of services, boosting confidence in institutions and thus generating a multiplier effect. This paper aims to update the literature on the data envelopment analysis (DEA), which uses a frontier methodology, for measuring the efficiency applied to the defence sector.Design/methodology/approachTwo main research areas are related through this study: Defence Economics and Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. The frontier methods for measuring technical efficiency are grouped into parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric. The DEA literature review in the selected sector allows to identify three main fields of work that are discussed in detail.FindingsExisting empirical research has hardly applied bootstrapping methods to remove bias from the estimates. No empirical work has applied an analysis of efficiency determinants by the inclusion of exogenous variables.Originality/valueThe managerial implications of efficiency are numerous. A line of research is proposed to examine the extent to which efficiency improvements have an impact on reputation and, therefore, on the image of and confidence in institutions. The link between Defence Economics and Corruption Economics is also considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国防部门DEA效率方法的文献综述
目的公共管理效率的提高导致服务质量的提高,增强对机构的信心,从而产生乘数效应。本文旨在更新有关数据包络分析(DEA)的文献,该分析使用前沿方法来测量应用于国防部门的效率。设计/方法/途径两个主要的研究领域是相关的,通过这项研究:国防经济学和效率和生产力分析。技术效率的前沿测量方法分为参数法、非参数法和半参数法。所选部门的DEA文献综述可以确定详细讨论的三个主要工作领域。现有的实证研究很少采用自举方法来消除估计中的偏差。没有实证工作应用的效率决定因素的分析,包括外生变量。创新/价值效率对管理的影响是多方面的。建议进行一系列研究,以检验提高效率对声誉的影响程度,从而对机构的形象和信心的影响程度。国防经济学和腐败经济学之间的联系也被考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The role of dynamic capabilities on the effectiveness of organizational changes in public sector Sustainable strategies and firm performance in manufacturing industry of Coahuila, Mexico Economic-financial performance and value creation in the Brazilian construction industry Firm certification and export performance: the case of the “SME Leader” label Innovation in the tourism sector, organizational learning and performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1