The Effect of Housing Environment on Physical Egg Quality of White Egg Layers

IF 3.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE World's Poultry Science Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.3390/poultry2020018
B. Alig, R. Malheiros, K. Anderson
{"title":"The Effect of Housing Environment on Physical Egg Quality of White Egg Layers","authors":"B. Alig, R. Malheiros, K. Anderson","doi":"10.3390/poultry2020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the egg industry is experiencing a shift in demand for eggs from cage-free environments. This study aims to evaluate the egg quality parameters of white eggs laid in several different housing environments utilized in the industry. Egg quality parameters from battery cages, barren colony cages, enriched colony cages and cage-free pens were compared. Overall, most egg quality parameters were found to be different across housing environments. Battery cages produced the heaviest eggs and eggs with the highest Haugh unit (p < 0.05). Cage-free hens produced eggs with the darkest yolks, lowest Haugh units, strongest shells and highest solids percentage compared to other environments (p < 0.05). This study did not detect differences between any housing environment in shell color, shell elasticity, vitelline membrane strength or vitelline membrane elasticity (p > 0.05). Moreover, this study did not detect any differences in egg quality parameters between enriched and barren colony cages (p > 0.05). It appears that white egg-laying hens had superior egg quality performance in caged environments and that cage-free pens only improved yolk color. Furthermore, it appears that simply adding enrichments to cages does not affect any egg quality parameters. From the results of our study, we believe that current intensive environments, such as cages, are the most beneficial for white egg layer egg quality and that as the industry moves toward cage-free, new strategies will need to be developed to preserve egg quality. More research is needed, particularly evaluating free-range environments.","PeriodicalId":24003,"journal":{"name":"World's Poultry Science Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World's Poultry Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry2020018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the egg industry is experiencing a shift in demand for eggs from cage-free environments. This study aims to evaluate the egg quality parameters of white eggs laid in several different housing environments utilized in the industry. Egg quality parameters from battery cages, barren colony cages, enriched colony cages and cage-free pens were compared. Overall, most egg quality parameters were found to be different across housing environments. Battery cages produced the heaviest eggs and eggs with the highest Haugh unit (p < 0.05). Cage-free hens produced eggs with the darkest yolks, lowest Haugh units, strongest shells and highest solids percentage compared to other environments (p < 0.05). This study did not detect differences between any housing environment in shell color, shell elasticity, vitelline membrane strength or vitelline membrane elasticity (p > 0.05). Moreover, this study did not detect any differences in egg quality parameters between enriched and barren colony cages (p > 0.05). It appears that white egg-laying hens had superior egg quality performance in caged environments and that cage-free pens only improved yolk color. Furthermore, it appears that simply adding enrichments to cages does not affect any egg quality parameters. From the results of our study, we believe that current intensive environments, such as cages, are the most beneficial for white egg layer egg quality and that as the industry moves toward cage-free, new strategies will need to be developed to preserve egg quality. More research is needed, particularly evaluating free-range environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲养环境对白蛋鸡物理蛋品质的影响
目前,蛋业正经历着对非笼养环境鸡蛋需求的转变。本研究旨在评价几种不同养殖环境下产白蛋鸡的蛋品质参数。比较了电池笼、贫瘠菌落笼、强化菌落笼和无笼栏的鸡蛋品质参数。总体而言,发现大多数鸡蛋质量参数在不同的住房环境中是不同的。电池笼产蛋最重,哈夫单位最高(p < 0.05)。与其他环境相比,散养母鸡的蛋黄颜色最深,哈夫单位最低,蛋壳最结实,固形率最高(p < 0.05)。本研究未发现不同饲养环境在蛋壳颜色、蛋壳弹性、卵黄膜强度和卵黄膜弹性方面存在差异(p < 0.05)。此外,本研究未发现强化集落笼与贫瘠集落笼之间的蛋品质参数差异(p < 0.05)。由此可见,白蛋鸡在笼养环境下的蛋品质性能较好,而非笼养只改善了蛋黄颜色。此外,似乎简单地向笼中添加营养物不会影响任何鸡蛋品质参数。从我们的研究结果来看,我们认为目前的集约化环境,如笼子,是最有利于白蛋鸡蛋质量的,随着行业向无笼化方向发展,需要制定新的策略来保持蛋质量。需要更多的研究,特别是评估自由放养的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World's Poultry Science Journal
World's Poultry Science Journal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: World''s Poultry Science Journal is the official publication of the World’s Poultry Science Association. The journal provides authoritative reviews in poultry science and an international forum for the exchange and dissemination of information including research, education and industry organisation. Each issue includes poultry industry-related news, regional reports on global developments in poultry, reports from specialist scientific working groups, book reviews, association news and a calendar of forthcoming events. Coverage includes breeding, nutrition, welfare, husbandry, production systems, processing, product development, physiology, egg and meat quality, industry structure, economics and education. The journal is of interest to academics, researchers, students, extension workers and commercial poultry producers.
期刊最新文献
The evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in Indonesia to mammalian hosts: a review of molecular markers An update on characterisation and applications of mesenchymal stem cells from chickens with challenges and prospective review Stop culling male layer-type chick: an overview of the alternatives and public perspective Possibilities of productive and reproductive performance improvement in geese: part II non-genetic factors Evaluation of the Addition of Humicola Grisea Cellulase to Broiler Chicken Rations for a 21-Day Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1