Examining attitudes toward and ability to interact with an online personal health record: A case study in Saudi Arabia

B. F. Al-Mifgai, J. Sharit, A. Onar-Thomas, S. Asfour
{"title":"Examining attitudes toward and ability to interact with an online personal health record: A case study in Saudi Arabia","authors":"B. F. Al-Mifgai, J. Sharit, A. Onar-Thomas, S. Asfour","doi":"10.5430/IJH.V6N1P1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examined the ability for adults from a developing country to use a personal health record (PHR) to perform health-management tasks. The effects of gender differences as well as differences in attitudes about using the internet to manage health prior to and after exposure to the PHR were also investigated.Methods: A simulation of a PHR based on a well-established U.S. online patient portal was designed and tailored for this particular study population. Two hundred and three adults with a mean age of 40.9 years were recruited from various areas in Saudi Arabia and asked to perform seven common health-management tasks of varying degrees of difficulty. Their electronic health literacy and health numeracy, as well as their attitudes about using online health systems for managing their health prior to and following their interaction with the PHR, were assessed using questionnaires.Results: After controlling for education, perceived health status, and comfort using the internet, electronic health literacy and health numeracy were still found to be significant predictors of participants’ task performance, but only for the more challenging health-management tasks. No important differences based on gender were found. Exposure to the PHR significantly increased the acceptability of using the internet for managing their health.Conclusions: The change in attitudes following interaction with the PHR suggests that many adults in this society could benefit from these electronic health systems, including females who, due to cultural considerations, may desire greater control in managing their health. However, the importance of electronic health literacy and health numeracy suggests the need for designs that minimize the impact of these factors for successful performance of health-management tasks.","PeriodicalId":73454,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/IJH.V6N1P1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the ability for adults from a developing country to use a personal health record (PHR) to perform health-management tasks. The effects of gender differences as well as differences in attitudes about using the internet to manage health prior to and after exposure to the PHR were also investigated.Methods: A simulation of a PHR based on a well-established U.S. online patient portal was designed and tailored for this particular study population. Two hundred and three adults with a mean age of 40.9 years were recruited from various areas in Saudi Arabia and asked to perform seven common health-management tasks of varying degrees of difficulty. Their electronic health literacy and health numeracy, as well as their attitudes about using online health systems for managing their health prior to and following their interaction with the PHR, were assessed using questionnaires.Results: After controlling for education, perceived health status, and comfort using the internet, electronic health literacy and health numeracy were still found to be significant predictors of participants’ task performance, but only for the more challenging health-management tasks. No important differences based on gender were found. Exposure to the PHR significantly increased the acceptability of using the internet for managing their health.Conclusions: The change in attitudes following interaction with the PHR suggests that many adults in this society could benefit from these electronic health systems, including females who, due to cultural considerations, may desire greater control in managing their health. However, the importance of electronic health literacy and health numeracy suggests the need for designs that minimize the impact of these factors for successful performance of health-management tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查对在线个人健康记录的态度和与之互动的能力:沙特阿拉伯的案例研究
目的:本研究考察了来自发展中国家的成年人使用个人健康记录(PHR)执行健康管理任务的能力。还调查了性别差异的影响,以及在接触初级保健药物之前和之后使用互联网管理健康的态度差异。方法:基于一个完善的美国在线患者门户网站,为这一特定的研究人群设计和定制了一个模拟PHR。研究人员从沙特阿拉伯的不同地区招募了203名平均年龄为40.9岁的成年人,要求他们完成7项不同难度的常见健康管理任务。他们的电子健康素养和健康计算能力,以及他们在与PHR互动之前和之后使用在线卫生系统管理健康的态度,都通过问卷进行了评估。结果:在控制了受教育程度、感知健康状况和使用互联网的舒适度后,电子健康素养和健康计算能力仍然被发现是参与者任务绩效的显著预测因素,但仅适用于更具挑战性的健康管理任务。没有发现基于性别的重要差异。接触《个人健康记录》大大提高了使用互联网管理其健康的可接受性。结论:与PHR互动后态度的变化表明,这个社会中的许多成年人可以从这些电子卫生系统中受益,包括女性,由于文化方面的考虑,可能希望在管理自己的健康方面有更大的控制权。然而,电子健康知识和健康计算能力的重要性表明,需要设计将这些因素的影响降至最低,以成功执行健康管理任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using AI-based virtual triage to improve acuity-level alignment of patient care seeking in an ambulatory care setting School-based strategies to prevent depression in adolescents: An integrative review Green buildings and their impact on health outcomes and dietary intake: What do we know? Ukrainian refugee women’s experiences of settlement and navigating health and social services in Canada Whether sodium and fluid restriction reduce exacerbations and readmissions for patients with heart failure: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1