{"title":"No walk in the park: Transboundary cooperation in the Angolan war-torn Okavango","authors":"Cristina Udelsmann Rodrigues, Vladimir Russo","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2017.1275658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Okavango region is currently part of a transboundary project extending to three neighboring countries—Angola, Namibia, and Botswana. This article discusses the unequal trajectory and present conditions for such cross-border cooperation, with a particular focus on Angola. Angola’s disadvantageous position is above all due to the lasting effects of war that adversely hindered the development of structures and resources to engage in such joint programs. The central argument is that the inequalities pose particular challenges to the country to accompany the pace of the neighboring countries. The article looks at the fragilities focusing on institutional resources, Angolan policy background, existing dedicated institutions, and human resources, as they are major concerns for post-war reconstruction. On the other hand, it poses questions regarding resilience effects on local level livelihoods and on the future environmental management of the Okavango. This article is based on a literature and documental review and on data from fieldwork where local communities have to rely more heavily on the available natural resources in absence of others.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"88 1","pages":"15 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1275658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Okavango region is currently part of a transboundary project extending to three neighboring countries—Angola, Namibia, and Botswana. This article discusses the unequal trajectory and present conditions for such cross-border cooperation, with a particular focus on Angola. Angola’s disadvantageous position is above all due to the lasting effects of war that adversely hindered the development of structures and resources to engage in such joint programs. The central argument is that the inequalities pose particular challenges to the country to accompany the pace of the neighboring countries. The article looks at the fragilities focusing on institutional resources, Angolan policy background, existing dedicated institutions, and human resources, as they are major concerns for post-war reconstruction. On the other hand, it poses questions regarding resilience effects on local level livelihoods and on the future environmental management of the Okavango. This article is based on a literature and documental review and on data from fieldwork where local communities have to rely more heavily on the available natural resources in absence of others.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals