The Lean Fluid Lifecycle: Optimizing Consumption and Waste in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

R. Jukes
{"title":"The Lean Fluid Lifecycle: Optimizing Consumption and Waste in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations","authors":"R. Jukes","doi":"10.2118/192068-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a case study reviewing the systematic optimization of fluid transport, consumption and waste in large hydraulic fracturing development campaigns. With a focus on reducing consumption, re-thinking transport, and creating value from waste fluid through recycling and reuse, the methodology applied has resulted in very real gains in economic, environmental, social and safety outcomes. The objective of this case study is to provide practical information and guidance for planning, execution and ongoing optimization to not only reduce the footprint of hydraulic fracturing activities but also reduce cost.\n By applying the methodology within this paper, the following was achieved over a 90 well development program: Fluid transport via trucking to wellsite virtually eliminated through use of the water production gathering network;Total fluid requirements reduced by 50%;Chemical costs reduced by 35%;Fluid disposal volume via trucking reduced by 95%; andFluid waste disposal costs reduced by 90%.\n While the case study presented is based on a coal bed methane (CBM) development where between 3,000 to 6,000 barrels of clean fluid was required per well, some or all of the methodologies may be applied to shale and conventional markets. With trends in stimulation volumes within the United States shale plays increasing more than threefold in recent years to upwards of 160,000 barrels per well (Dunkel, M. R., 2017), it is the responsibility of the industry to ensure that further growth into Australian shale markets – such as in the Northern Territory – are managed sustainably. For optimal results, fluid logistics cannot be an afterthought in development planning left to the hydraulic fracturing operation, but a key consideration in the overall project strategy.","PeriodicalId":11240,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192068-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a case study reviewing the systematic optimization of fluid transport, consumption and waste in large hydraulic fracturing development campaigns. With a focus on reducing consumption, re-thinking transport, and creating value from waste fluid through recycling and reuse, the methodology applied has resulted in very real gains in economic, environmental, social and safety outcomes. The objective of this case study is to provide practical information and guidance for planning, execution and ongoing optimization to not only reduce the footprint of hydraulic fracturing activities but also reduce cost. By applying the methodology within this paper, the following was achieved over a 90 well development program: Fluid transport via trucking to wellsite virtually eliminated through use of the water production gathering network;Total fluid requirements reduced by 50%;Chemical costs reduced by 35%;Fluid disposal volume via trucking reduced by 95%; andFluid waste disposal costs reduced by 90%. While the case study presented is based on a coal bed methane (CBM) development where between 3,000 to 6,000 barrels of clean fluid was required per well, some or all of the methodologies may be applied to shale and conventional markets. With trends in stimulation volumes within the United States shale plays increasing more than threefold in recent years to upwards of 160,000 barrels per well (Dunkel, M. R., 2017), it is the responsibility of the industry to ensure that further growth into Australian shale markets – such as in the Northern Territory – are managed sustainably. For optimal results, fluid logistics cannot be an afterthought in development planning left to the hydraulic fracturing operation, but a key consideration in the overall project strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精益流体生命周期:优化水力压裂作业的消耗和浪费
本文介绍了一个大型水力压裂开发项目中流体输送、消耗和浪费的系统优化案例。所采用的方法侧重于减少消耗,重新思考运输,并通过回收和再利用从废液中创造价值,因此在经济、环境、社会和安全成果方面取得了非常实际的成果。本案例研究的目的是为规划、执行和持续优化提供实用信息和指导,不仅可以减少水力压裂活动的占地面积,还可以降低成本。通过应用本文中的方法,在90口井的开发项目中实现了以下目标:通过使用采水收集网络,几乎消除了通过卡车运输到井场的流体运输,总流体需求量减少了50%,化学成本降低了35%,卡车运输的流体处理量减少了95%。流体废物处理成本降低90%。虽然所介绍的案例研究是基于煤层气(CBM)开发,每口井需要3000至6000桶清洁流体,但部分或全部方法可能适用于页岩和常规市场。近年来,随着美国页岩油增产量的增长趋势增加了三倍多,达到每口井16万桶以上(Dunkel, m.r, 2017),油气行业有责任确保澳大利亚页岩油市场(如北领地)的进一步增长得到可持续管理。为了获得最佳效果,流体物流不能成为水力压裂作业开发规划中的事后考虑,而是整个项目战略中的关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Investigation of Crude Oil Emulsion Stability: Effect of Oil and Brine Compositions, Asphaltene, Wax, Toluene-insolubles, Temperature, Shear-stress, and Water-cut Simple Numerical Simulations to Demonstrate Key Concepts Related to Coal Seam Gas Well Integrity The Lean Fluid Lifecycle: Optimizing Consumption and Waste in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Application of Novel Predictive Analytics for Data Allocation of Commingled Production in Smart Fields A Multiscale Study on The Onset of Sand Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1