Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial

N. Hochhausen, M. Ritter, Andreas Follmann, Henriette Dohmeier, R. Rossaint, M. Czaplik
{"title":"Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"N. Hochhausen, M. Ritter, Andreas Follmann, Henriette Dohmeier, R. Rossaint, M. Czaplik","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Postoperative pain management requires a well-directed pain therapy. Generally, the assessment of pain intensity depends on a self-evaluated numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10). Recently, a pain monitor using a socalled “ANI” (analgesia nociception index; 100 to 0) was introduced. The higher the ANI, the lower the pain intensity is considered. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of ANI improves acute pain therapy in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) by means of the experienced pain intensity (mean NRS) as the primary outcome parameter.Methods: After admission to PACU, patients were randomly assigned to the “supported by technique” (TC) or the control group (CO). In both groups, self-assessment of pain intensity was requested every 15 minutes and pain therapy was provided according to internal clinical standards when the self-reported NRS by the patient exceeded 4. In the TC group, NRS pain score was additionally assessed when ANI fell below 50.Results: Out of 91 collectively included patients, 46 were assigned to the TC group. The mean NRS did not differ between the groups (p=0.192) at discharge. However, suitability of the ANI monitor was strongly dependent from the individual patient. In some patients, a strong negative correlation was obtained, in other patients no correlation or, curiously, a strong positive correlation was observed.Conclusion: Although objective pain intensity assessment would be beneficial for postoperative care, its measurement remains challenging.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative pain management requires a well-directed pain therapy. Generally, the assessment of pain intensity depends on a self-evaluated numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10). Recently, a pain monitor using a socalled “ANI” (analgesia nociception index; 100 to 0) was introduced. The higher the ANI, the lower the pain intensity is considered. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of ANI improves acute pain therapy in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) by means of the experienced pain intensity (mean NRS) as the primary outcome parameter.Methods: After admission to PACU, patients were randomly assigned to the “supported by technique” (TC) or the control group (CO). In both groups, self-assessment of pain intensity was requested every 15 minutes and pain therapy was provided according to internal clinical standards when the self-reported NRS by the patient exceeded 4. In the TC group, NRS pain score was additionally assessed when ANI fell below 50.Results: Out of 91 collectively included patients, 46 were assigned to the TC group. The mean NRS did not differ between the groups (p=0.192) at discharge. However, suitability of the ANI monitor was strongly dependent from the individual patient. In some patients, a strong negative correlation was obtained, in other patients no correlation or, curiously, a strong positive correlation was observed.Conclusion: Although objective pain intensity assessment would be beneficial for postoperative care, its measurement remains challenging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉后护理病房镇痛痛觉指数对急性疼痛治疗的支持:一项随机对照试验
目的:术后疼痛管理需要有针对性的疼痛治疗。一般来说,疼痛强度的评估依赖于自评的数字评定量表(NRS, 0到10)。最近,一种使用所谓“ANI”(镇痛痛觉指数;100到0)。ANI越高,疼痛强度越低。本研究的目的是通过疼痛强度(平均NRS)作为主要结局参数,调查ANI的使用是否能改善麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的急性疼痛治疗。方法:患者入PACU后,随机分为技术支持组(TC)和对照组(CO)。两组患者自报NRS超过4分时,每15分钟进行一次疼痛强度自评,并按内部临床标准进行疼痛治疗。在TC组,当ANI低于50时,额外评估NRS疼痛评分。结果:共纳入91例患者,46例被分配到TC组。两组患者出院时的平均NRS无差异(p=0.192)。然而,ANI监测器的适用性强烈依赖于个体患者。在一些患者中,有很强的负相关,在另一些患者中没有相关,或者奇怪的是,有很强的正相关。结论:虽然客观的疼痛强度评估有助于术后护理,但其测量仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurogenic information in autoimmune diseases and chronic pain syndromes Predictive Validity of Lumbar X-ray Images and MRIs for Chronic Low Back Pain Subtypes Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Spontaneous Pain in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Dexketoprofen for Mild to Moderate Pain among Filipino Adults: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1