The adaptive market hypothesis and the return predictability in the cryptocurrency markets

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics and Business Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18559/ebr.2023.1.4
J. Karasiński
{"title":"The adaptive market hypothesis and the return predictability in the cryptocurrency markets","authors":"J. Karasiński","doi":"10.18559/ebr.2023.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study employs robust martingale difference hypothesis tests to examine return predictability in a broad sample of the 40 most capitalized cryptocurrency markets in the context of the adaptive market hypothesis. The tests were applied to daily returns using the rolling window method in the research period from May 1, 2013 to September 30, 2022. The results of this study suggest that the returns of the majority of the examined cryptocurrencies were unpredictable most of the time. However, a great part of them also suffered some short periods of weak-form inefficiency. The results obtained validate the adaptive market hypothesis. Additionally, this study allowed the observation of some differences in return predictability between the examined cryptocurrencies. Also some historical trends in weak-form efficiency were identified. The results suggest that the predictability of cryptocurrency returns might have decreased in recent years also no significant relationship between market cap and predictability was observed.","PeriodicalId":41557,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study employs robust martingale difference hypothesis tests to examine return predictability in a broad sample of the 40 most capitalized cryptocurrency markets in the context of the adaptive market hypothesis. The tests were applied to daily returns using the rolling window method in the research period from May 1, 2013 to September 30, 2022. The results of this study suggest that the returns of the majority of the examined cryptocurrencies were unpredictable most of the time. However, a great part of them also suffered some short periods of weak-form inefficiency. The results obtained validate the adaptive market hypothesis. Additionally, this study allowed the observation of some differences in return predictability between the examined cryptocurrencies. Also some historical trends in weak-form efficiency were identified. The results suggest that the predictability of cryptocurrency returns might have decreased in recent years also no significant relationship between market cap and predictability was observed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自适应市场假说与加密货币市场的收益可预测性
本研究采用鲁棒鞅差异假设检验,在适应性市场假设的背景下,对40个资本化程度最高的加密货币市场的广泛样本进行回报可预测性检验。采用滚动窗法对2013年5月1日至2022年9月30日的日收益进行检验。这项研究的结果表明,大多数被研究的加密货币的回报在大多数时候是不可预测的。然而,他们中的很大一部分也遭受了一些短期的弱形式的效率低下。所得结果验证了适应性市场假说。此外,这项研究允许观察到所研究的加密货币之间回报可预测性的一些差异。此外,还确定了弱形式效率的一些历史趋势。结果表明,近年来加密货币回报的可预测性可能有所下降,并且市值与可预测性之间没有显着关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposal for a comprehensive retirement insurance solution (CRIS) to mitigate retirement risk based on theory of change Enhancing garbage fee compliance: Insights from a Slovak municipality Taxation of public pensions in European Union countries Personal bankruptcy prediction using machine learning techniques Examining the performance of Shari’ah‑compliant versus conventional stock indexes: A comparative analysis pre-, during, and post-COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1