National Business Cultures as a System‑forming Factor of the “Lublin Triangle”

B. Glinkowska-Krauze, V. Chebotarov, Iegor Chebotarov
{"title":"National Business Cultures as a System‑forming Factor of the “Lublin Triangle”","authors":"B. Glinkowska-Krauze, V. Chebotarov, Iegor Chebotarov","doi":"10.18778/1508-2008.25.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the evolution of the scientific knowledge on the topic the authors define “national business cultures” as a complex interdisciplinary basic phenomenon of modern comparative studies and international entrepreneurship. Using the accepted in the world comparative studies methodology – indicative parameters of national business cultures and considering the authors’ corresponding empirical developments a systematic comparative analysis of the national business cultures of the founding countries of the new cooperation platform in Central and Eastern Europe – the “Lublin Triangle” (Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine) – is carried out. The close similarity and wide complementarity of the national business cultures of these countries are revealed. This is largely predetermined not only by their common, centuries‑old history, but also by a number of other institutional and economic factors, as well as natural conditions. The priority sectors and spheres of integration of the three countries are determined both at the interstate level and at the level of the interaction of their business structures. Implementing this approach will ensure an increase in the competitive positions of Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine and, as a result, the Lublin Triangle as a whole, in the system of the modern international division of labor. Based on the similarity and complementarity of the national business cultures, a group of other countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria) was selected. Under certain conditions, they could also become members of the Lublin Triangle, which would further strengthen and develop the European Union.","PeriodicalId":44249,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Considering the evolution of the scientific knowledge on the topic the authors define “national business cultures” as a complex interdisciplinary basic phenomenon of modern comparative studies and international entrepreneurship. Using the accepted in the world comparative studies methodology – indicative parameters of national business cultures and considering the authors’ corresponding empirical developments a systematic comparative analysis of the national business cultures of the founding countries of the new cooperation platform in Central and Eastern Europe – the “Lublin Triangle” (Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine) – is carried out. The close similarity and wide complementarity of the national business cultures of these countries are revealed. This is largely predetermined not only by their common, centuries‑old history, but also by a number of other institutional and economic factors, as well as natural conditions. The priority sectors and spheres of integration of the three countries are determined both at the interstate level and at the level of the interaction of their business structures. Implementing this approach will ensure an increase in the competitive positions of Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine and, as a result, the Lublin Triangle as a whole, in the system of the modern international division of labor. Based on the similarity and complementarity of the national business cultures, a group of other countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria) was selected. Under certain conditions, they could also become members of the Lublin Triangle, which would further strengthen and develop the European Union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族商业文化作为“卢布林三角”的系统形成因素
考虑到这一主题的科学知识的演变,作者将“国家商业文化”定义为现代比较研究和国际创业的一个复杂的跨学科基本现象。采用世界公认的比较研究方法- 国家商业文化的指示参数,并考虑到作者相应的实证发展,对中欧和东欧新合作平台的创始国家- “卢布林三角”(波兰,立陶宛,乌克兰)- 的国家商业文化进行了系统的比较分析。这些国家的民族商业文化有着密切的相似性和广泛的互补性。这在很大程度上不仅是由它们共同的、数百年的历史决定的,而且还由许多其他制度和经济因素以及自然条件决定的。三国一体化的优先领域和领域是在国家间层面和三国商业结构互动层面确定的。实施这一方针将确保提高波兰、立陶宛和乌克兰的竞争地位,从而提高整个卢布林三角在现代国际分工体系中的竞争地位。基于各国商业文化的相似性和互补性,中欧和东欧的一些其他国家(拉脱维亚、爱沙尼亚、斯洛伐克、罗马尼亚和保加利亚)被选中。在某些条件下,它们也可以成为卢布林三角的成员,这将进一步加强和发展欧洲联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Smart Cities for the Sustainable Development of Local Communities: the Cases of the Volyn Region and the City of Lublin Poverty in Selected European Countries. A Spatio-temporal Analysis from 2003–2020 The Impact of Economic Equilibrium, Globalization, Human Development, and Market Competitiveness on the Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises – the Case of France, Germany, Italy and Poland The Mundell‑Fleming Model and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies A Reassessment of Oil Market Volatility and Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from Selected SAARC Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1