Early Modern utopian islands: restoring a damaged Garden.

Coolabah Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1344/CO20213180-92
Sotirios Triantafyllos
{"title":"Early Modern utopian islands: restoring a damaged Garden.","authors":"Sotirios Triantafyllos","doi":"10.1344/CO20213180-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in islands grew rapidly during the Early Modern period as many explorers, merchants, monarchs and political commentators perceived islands as earthly paradises or magical loci of extreme riches. This paper presents an alternative strand of the period's ‘islomania’, where the newly discovered islands were imagined as loci of wilderness: empty lands that human ingenuity and hard work could be ‘improved’ into a utopia. Triumphal narratives of conquering nature were based on the newfound optimism inspired by fifteenth century humanism and the tenets of Early Modern natural philosophy. However, processes of ‘improvement’ cannot be thought of as apolitical or dislocated as they are often embedded in the colonialist narratives of the time. By examining a series of imaginary ‘utopian’ islands of the Early Modern period, including Utopia, New Atlantis, The Isle of Pines and the island of Robinson Crusoe, this paper dismantles binary conceptions of Early Modern mythical islands as paradise/hell, utopia/dystopia to a more nuanced understanding of how these writers utilised and depicted ‘utopia’ to reflect political, religious and social mores of the time.","PeriodicalId":10741,"journal":{"name":"Coolabah","volume":"54 1","pages":"80-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coolabah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/CO20213180-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in islands grew rapidly during the Early Modern period as many explorers, merchants, monarchs and political commentators perceived islands as earthly paradises or magical loci of extreme riches. This paper presents an alternative strand of the period's ‘islomania’, where the newly discovered islands were imagined as loci of wilderness: empty lands that human ingenuity and hard work could be ‘improved’ into a utopia. Triumphal narratives of conquering nature were based on the newfound optimism inspired by fifteenth century humanism and the tenets of Early Modern natural philosophy. However, processes of ‘improvement’ cannot be thought of as apolitical or dislocated as they are often embedded in the colonialist narratives of the time. By examining a series of imaginary ‘utopian’ islands of the Early Modern period, including Utopia, New Atlantis, The Isle of Pines and the island of Robinson Crusoe, this paper dismantles binary conceptions of Early Modern mythical islands as paradise/hell, utopia/dystopia to a more nuanced understanding of how these writers utilised and depicted ‘utopia’ to reflect political, religious and social mores of the time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期现代乌托邦岛屿:修复受损的花园。
在近代早期,人们对岛屿的兴趣迅速增长,因为许多探险家、商人、君主和政治评论员将岛屿视为人间天堂或极富的神奇地点。本文提出了这一时期“伊斯兰狂热”的另一种观点,在这种观点中,新发现的岛屿被想象成荒野的地点:人类的聪明才智和辛勤工作可以“改善”成乌托邦的空旷之地。征服自然的胜利叙事是建立在新发现的乐观主义的基础上的,这种乐观主义受到15世纪的人文主义和早期现代自然哲学的原则的启发。然而,“改善”的过程不能被认为是无关政治的或错位的,因为它们经常被嵌入当时的殖民主义叙事中。通过研究一系列现代早期虚构的“乌托邦”岛屿,包括乌托邦、新亚特兰蒂斯、松岛和鲁滨逊漂流记岛,本文解构了早期现代神话岛屿的二元概念,如天堂/地狱、乌托邦/反乌托邦,以更细致入微地理解这些作家如何利用和描绘“乌托邦”来反映当时的政治、宗教和社会习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Clouds Apparitions and Atmospheres Effects of Atmosphere in Andrew McGahan’s “The Rich Man’s House” Nessie and Noctilucent Clouds My Mother’s Ghosts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1