Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years

W. Sewell, S. Teitelbaum
{"title":"Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years","authors":"W. Sewell, S. Teitelbaum","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198607)37:4%3C234::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"End-user searching of National Library of Medicine (NLM) online data bases during eleven years has been investigated through transaction logs, questionnaires, and follow-up interviews. From 1976 through 1984, pathologists and pharmacists performed 8,313 searches. Highlights of our studies are compared with a review of other end-user research. Volume of searching is directly related to the convenient placement of the terminal in the work place. Slightly fewer than half of all potential searchers actually search for themselves. Practices of pharmacists and pathologists do not differ in important ways. Nonmediated searchers feel they need answers more promptly than do those who obtain mediated searches. End-users perform very simple searches, mostly using only the AND operator. Problems with techniques are fewer and more easily solved than those with the vocabulary and content of the system. The major problems, with the most powerful capabilities of MEDLINE--subheadings and explosions--sometimes cause substantial loss of references, but in relatively few searches. One-on-one teaching is most popular, with trial-and-error the most frequent procedure used in actual learning.","PeriodicalId":79676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","volume":"33 1","pages":"234-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198607)37:4%3C234::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

End-user searching of National Library of Medicine (NLM) online data bases during eleven years has been investigated through transaction logs, questionnaires, and follow-up interviews. From 1976 through 1984, pathologists and pharmacists performed 8,313 searches. Highlights of our studies are compared with a review of other end-user research. Volume of searching is directly related to the convenient placement of the terminal in the work place. Slightly fewer than half of all potential searchers actually search for themselves. Practices of pharmacists and pathologists do not differ in important ways. Nonmediated searchers feel they need answers more promptly than do those who obtain mediated searches. End-users perform very simple searches, mostly using only the AND operator. Problems with techniques are fewer and more easily solved than those with the vocabulary and content of the system. The major problems, with the most powerful capabilities of MEDLINE--subheadings and explosions--sometimes cause substantial loss of references, but in relatively few searches. One-on-one teaching is most popular, with trial-and-error the most frequent procedure used in actual learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对11年来终端用户在线搜索行为的观察
通过交易日志、问卷调查和随访访谈,对11年来美国国家医学图书馆(NLM)在线数据库的最终用户搜索情况进行了调查。从1976年到1984年,病理学家和药剂师进行了8313次搜索。我们研究的重点与其他终端用户研究的综述进行了比较。搜索量的多少直接关系到终端在工作场所的摆放是否方便。在所有潜在的搜索者中,只有不到一半的人会搜索自己。药剂师和病理学家的实践在重要方面没有什么不同。非中介搜索者觉得他们比中介搜索者更需要答案。最终用户执行非常简单的搜索,大多数只使用AND操作符。与系统的词汇表和内容相比,技术方面的问题更少,也更容易解决。MEDLINE功能最强大的主要问题——副标题和爆炸——有时会导致大量的参考文献丢失,但在相对较少的搜索中。一对一教学是最受欢迎的,在实际学习中最常用的是试错法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Indexing of Documents from Journal Descriptors: A Preliminary Investigation The Persistence of Fraud in the Literature: The Darsee Case An investigation of the optimization of search logic for the MEDLINE database The Medline/full-text research project Computer human interaction for image information systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1