Economic Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Case of Landscape Aesthetics in the Agritourism Market

Shachar Hatan, A. Fleischer, Anat Tchetchik
{"title":"Economic Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Case of Landscape Aesthetics in the Agritourism Market","authors":"Shachar Hatan, A. Fleischer, Anat Tchetchik","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Natural and agricultural landscapes provide a wide range of ecosystem services, among which are aesthetic landscapes. As these services have no direct market value, land use decision makers often ignore them in favor of urban sprawl, resulting in suboptimal resource allocation. Here, we suggest a novel method to evaluate the aesthetic landscape services of natural and agricultural ecosystems using the case of the agritourism market in Israel. We model the agritourism market as an oligopolistic market with differentiated products and formulate an equilibrium model with structural, double nested logit demand and pricing equations. The structural equations are expressed as a function of the attributes of the agritourism firm, among which are the components of landscape view. We use aggregate market data and GIS data to estimate the structural model. In the case of urban sprawl, the welfare loss is estimated at US$29,000–53,000 per km2, depending on the type of ecosystem that is forgone, whereas in agricultural sprawl over natural areas, the welfare loss is estimated at US$38,000 per km2. This welfare loss can be considered the economic value of landscape aesthetics services to the agritourism market. These findings illustrate the potential of using this valuation method for other ecosystems in other markets.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Natural and agricultural landscapes provide a wide range of ecosystem services, among which are aesthetic landscapes. As these services have no direct market value, land use decision makers often ignore them in favor of urban sprawl, resulting in suboptimal resource allocation. Here, we suggest a novel method to evaluate the aesthetic landscape services of natural and agricultural ecosystems using the case of the agritourism market in Israel. We model the agritourism market as an oligopolistic market with differentiated products and formulate an equilibrium model with structural, double nested logit demand and pricing equations. The structural equations are expressed as a function of the attributes of the agritourism firm, among which are the components of landscape view. We use aggregate market data and GIS data to estimate the structural model. In the case of urban sprawl, the welfare loss is estimated at US$29,000–53,000 per km2, depending on the type of ecosystem that is forgone, whereas in agricultural sprawl over natural areas, the welfare loss is estimated at US$38,000 per km2. This welfare loss can be considered the economic value of landscape aesthetics services to the agritourism market. These findings illustrate the potential of using this valuation method for other ecosystems in other markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化生态系统服务的经济价值评估:以农业旅游市场中的景观美学为例
自然景观和农业景观提供了广泛的生态系统服务,其中包括审美景观。由于这些服务没有直接的市场价值,土地使用决策者往往忽视它们,而倾向于城市扩张,导致资源配置不佳。本文以以色列的农业旅游市场为例,提出了一种评估自然生态系统和农业生态系统的美学景观服务的新方法。我们将农业旅游市场建模为具有差异化产品的寡头垄断市场,并建立了一个具有结构性、双嵌套的logit需求和定价方程的均衡模型。结构方程表示为农业旅游企业属性的函数,其中包括景观景观的组成部分。我们使用汇总市场数据和GIS数据来估计结构模型。在城市扩张的情况下,福利损失估计为每平方公里29,000-53,000美元,具体取决于所放弃的生态系统类型,而在自然地区的农业扩张中,福利损失估计为每平方公里38,000美元。这种福利损失可以被认为是景观美学服务于农业旅游市场的经济价值。这些发现说明了在其他市场的其他生态系统中使用这种评估方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and State-Building in the World’s Most Agricultural Countries The heterogeneous effects of agricultural conservation easements on the loss of farmland to development in New England Displacement Risk in Agricultural Commodity Markets: The Impact of Plant-Based Meat Interest Group Responses to Reform Efforts in the U.S. House of Representatives: The Case of Big Sugar Fishing under the Radar: Illuminating the Compliance Gap of Fishing Bans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1