Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries

Q2 Social Sciences LIBER Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-04-25 DOI:10.18352/lq.10320
Clare Thorpe, A. Howlett
{"title":"Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries","authors":"Clare Thorpe, A. Howlett","doi":"10.18352/lq.10320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based practice is an approach to professional practice that involves a structured process of collecting, interpreting and applying valid and reliable research and evidence to support decision-making and continuous service improvement in professional practice. This paper reports on emerging initiatives in evidence-based practice at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) Library, a regional multi-campus university in Australia. It demonstrates how evidence-based practice forms part of our organisational strategy to engage with our community and society. The case study describes a new model of embedding evidence-based practice through a role explicitly dedicated to developing the library’s evidence base. While other libraries may have a person responsible for assessment, performance metrics or data analysis, the Coordinator (Evidence-Based Practice) has a broader mandate – to work with library staff to develop tools, skills and expertise in evidence-based practice. The paper will describe why this role was created and how the Coordinator is working to engage with library staff to understand their business and the evidence needed to support service improvement for the Library. By doing this, USQ Library is building the capacity to demonstrate value to stakeholders, gain a deeper understanding of clients’ needs and experiences, promote robust decision-making and improve service delivery. The paper also outlines an initiative led by the Coordinator (Evidence-Based Practice) to develop a conceptual model of evidence-based practice within academic libraries at the organisational, rather than individual level. Current models of evidence-based library and information practice apply predominantly to individuals. Informed by relevant literature and 16 semi-structured interviews with library professionals from Australian and New Zealand university libraries, three themes emerged to describe how evidence-based practice might be experienced at the organisational level. The lived experience at USQ Library and our research investigations suggest that being evidence-based provides benefits to an academic library’s culture, practice and impact.","PeriodicalId":39179,"journal":{"name":"LIBER Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBER Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Evidence-based practice is an approach to professional practice that involves a structured process of collecting, interpreting and applying valid and reliable research and evidence to support decision-making and continuous service improvement in professional practice. This paper reports on emerging initiatives in evidence-based practice at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) Library, a regional multi-campus university in Australia. It demonstrates how evidence-based practice forms part of our organisational strategy to engage with our community and society. The case study describes a new model of embedding evidence-based practice through a role explicitly dedicated to developing the library’s evidence base. While other libraries may have a person responsible for assessment, performance metrics or data analysis, the Coordinator (Evidence-Based Practice) has a broader mandate – to work with library staff to develop tools, skills and expertise in evidence-based practice. The paper will describe why this role was created and how the Coordinator is working to engage with library staff to understand their business and the evidence needed to support service improvement for the Library. By doing this, USQ Library is building the capacity to demonstrate value to stakeholders, gain a deeper understanding of clients’ needs and experiences, promote robust decision-making and improve service delivery. The paper also outlines an initiative led by the Coordinator (Evidence-Based Practice) to develop a conceptual model of evidence-based practice within academic libraries at the organisational, rather than individual level. Current models of evidence-based library and information practice apply predominantly to individuals. Informed by relevant literature and 16 semi-structured interviews with library professionals from Australian and New Zealand university libraries, three themes emerged to describe how evidence-based practice might be experienced at the organisational level. The lived experience at USQ Library and our research investigations suggest that being evidence-based provides benefits to an academic library’s culture, practice and impact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用和概念的方法,以证据为基础的实践在研究和学术图书馆
循证实践是一种专业实践的方法,它包括一个结构化的过程,收集、解释和应用有效和可靠的研究和证据,以支持专业实践中的决策和持续的服务改进。本文报道了澳大利亚南昆士兰大学(USQ)图书馆(一所区域性多校区大学)在循证实践方面的新举措。它展示了基于证据的实践如何构成我们与社区和社会互动的组织战略的一部分。本案例研究描述了一种通过明确致力于发展图书馆证据基础的角色嵌入循证实践的新模式。虽然其他图书馆可能有一个人负责评估、绩效指标或数据分析,但协调员(循证实践)的任务范围更广——与图书馆工作人员一起开发循证实践的工具、技能和专业知识。该文件将描述为何设立这一职位,以及协调员如何与图书馆员工合作,了解他们的业务,以及支持图书馆服务改进所需的证据。通过这样做,南昆士兰大学图书馆正在建立向利益相关者展示价值的能力,更深入地了解客户的需求和经验,促进强有力的决策和改善服务交付。本文还概述了由协调员(循证实践)领导的一项倡议,该倡议旨在在组织而非个人层面上开发学术图书馆循证实践的概念模型。目前基于证据的图书馆和信息实践模式主要适用于个人。根据相关文献和对澳大利亚和新西兰大学图书馆专业人员的16次半结构化访谈,出现了三个主题来描述如何在组织层面体验基于证据的实践。南昆士兰大学图书馆的生活经验和我们的研究调查表明,以证据为基础为学术图书馆的文化、实践和影响提供了好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LIBER Quarterly
LIBER Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nitpicking online knowledge representations of governmental leadership. The case of Belgian prime ministers in Wikipedia and Wikidata. Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports Lessons From the Open Library of Humanities Patterns for searching data on the web across different research communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1