Social Support in Online Peer Groups for Celiac Disease

IF 1.3 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL European Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1027/2512-8442/a000126

Dorothee Köstlin, B. Siem, Anette Rohmann

{"title":"Social Support in Online Peer Groups for Celiac Disease","authors":"Dorothee Köstlin, B. Siem, Anette Rohmann","doi":"10.1027/2512-8442/a000126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Background: While there is considerable evidence for the positive effects of onsite peer support on health outcomes, few studies have addressed the impact of online peer support. Aims: This study differentiates between emotional (ES) and informational (IS) online peer support for people with celiac disease. We hypothesize that receiving ES and IS positively correlates with self-reported well-being and dietary compliance and that these relations would be moderated by the duration of illness. Method: We used a correlational, cross-sectional design ( N = 369). Results: Both functions of support were positively related to well-being and dietary compliance. The strengths of the positive relationships between ES and both outcomes and IS and well-being were independent of the duration of illness. IS was significantly positively related to dietary compliance among participants with a longer duration of illness, but unrelated among participants with a shorter duration. Limitations: Due to the correlational design, we cannot infer causality. Conclusion: Our findings advance the understanding of online support in contexts where proper self-management is crucial for health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Background: While there is considerable evidence for the positive effects of onsite peer support on health outcomes, few studies have addressed the impact of online peer support. Aims: This study differentiates between emotional (ES) and informational (IS) online peer support for people with celiac disease. We hypothesize that receiving ES and IS positively correlates with self-reported well-being and dietary compliance and that these relations would be moderated by the duration of illness. Method: We used a correlational, cross-sectional design ( N = 369). Results: Both functions of support were positively related to well-being and dietary compliance. The strengths of the positive relationships between ES and both outcomes and IS and well-being were independent of the duration of illness. IS was significantly positively related to dietary compliance among participants with a longer duration of illness, but unrelated among participants with a shorter duration. Limitations: Due to the correlational design, we cannot infer causality. Conclusion: Our findings advance the understanding of online support in contexts where proper self-management is crucial for health outcomes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

乳糜泻在线同伴群体的社会支持

摘要背景:虽然有相当多的证据表明现场同伴支持对健康结果有积极影响，但很少有研究涉及在线同伴支持的影响。目的:本研究区分了乳糜泻患者的情感(ES)和信息(IS)在线同伴支持。我们假设接受ES和IS与自我报告的幸福感和饮食依从性呈正相关，并且这些关系将被疾病的持续时间所缓和。方法:采用相关横断面设计(N = 369)。结果:两种支持功能与幸福感和饮食依从性呈正相关。心理健康与两种结果、心理健康与幸福感之间正相关的强度与疾病的持续时间无关。在病程较长的参与者中，IS与饮食依从性显著正相关，但在病程较短的参与者中不相关。局限性:由于相关设计，我们不能推断因果关系。结论:我们的研究结果促进了对网络支持的理解，在这种情况下，适当的自我管理对健康结果至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Die "Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie" wurde gegründet, um dem raschen Anwachsen gesundheitspsychologischer Forschung sowie deren Relevanz für verschiedene Anwendungsfelder gerecht zu werden. Gesundheitspsychologie versteht sich als wissenschaftlicher Beitrag der Psychologie zur Förderung und Erhaltung von Gesundheit, zur Verhütung und Behandlung von Krankheiten, zur Bestimmung von Risikoverhaltensweisen, zur Diagnose und Ursachenbestimmung von gesundheitlichen Störungen sowie zur Verbessung des Systems gesundheitlicher Vorsorge.

期刊最新文献

Ambivalence Toward the Implementation of Preventive Measures in (Un-)Vaccinated German Citizens Personality Factors and Health Beliefs Related to Attitudes Toward Wearing Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic Meeting Calendar List of Reviewers 2023 How Communicating Vaccine Benefits and Harms in Fact Boxes Affects Risk Perceptions