Recent Case Histories of Multilateral Systems Enabling Thru Tubing Intervention in the Middle East

B. Butler, M. Kelsey, Baidy Racine
{"title":"Recent Case Histories of Multilateral Systems Enabling Thru Tubing Intervention in the Middle East","authors":"B. Butler, M. Kelsey, Baidy Racine","doi":"10.2118/208103-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Historically, the ability to perform intervention on multilateral wells has been limited. While multilateral (ML) well construction technologies have progressed to a high level of reliability, multilateral systems that enabled intervention during the life of well had a more limited track record. Intervention outcomes after prolonged periods of production were less consistent. This lack of technologies with sufficient intervention case histories meant that generally multilateral well architecture was not selected in applications where thru tubing intervention was a requirement. In recent years, multilateral well architecture has continued to increase in demand, with more ML wells drilled and completed in the last five years than any other five-year period in the technology's history. With this increased demand has come industry enthusiasm to further mature its intervention capabilities.\n This paper will review two recent case histories of separate multilateral well completion systems that enable intervention. This opens up new potential for the industry to take advantage of the cost reductions achieved with multilaterals in a much larger scope of well applications.\n Two separate completion systems will be covered in this paper, System A installed in a cemented multilateral junction and system B, a completion that creates a hydraulically isolated junction via either a dual string completion or a single string completion that splits into two strings. These case histories were exectuted in 2017 to 2019, and interventions were performed after one to two years of production.\n Detailed in each case study will be an overview of the equipment, the operational sequence, intervention outcome, and any lessons learned or improvements.\n The systems have demonstrated themselves as a reliable method to access laterals in non-ideal downhole environments where debris is present after the well has been on production. The tubing sizes for the case studies are 3-1/2\" and 4-1/2\". In each of these wells, the following operations have been successfully performed: drift testing, acid stimulation through coil tubing and breaking of a ceramic disc. Both slickline and coil tubing have been used for the interventions and in some cases with tractors. Junction inclinations range from 1 to 43 degrees.\n Plans for ongoing installations for the systems are being executed in the Middle East Region. Further, expansion of the system A capabilities by integrating it with other existing technologies is also planned. This will enable projects such as the installation of a trilateral well with flow control and intervention for each individual leg, and also the conversion of existing single bore wells to multilateral with intervention capability.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208103-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Historically, the ability to perform intervention on multilateral wells has been limited. While multilateral (ML) well construction technologies have progressed to a high level of reliability, multilateral systems that enabled intervention during the life of well had a more limited track record. Intervention outcomes after prolonged periods of production were less consistent. This lack of technologies with sufficient intervention case histories meant that generally multilateral well architecture was not selected in applications where thru tubing intervention was a requirement. In recent years, multilateral well architecture has continued to increase in demand, with more ML wells drilled and completed in the last five years than any other five-year period in the technology's history. With this increased demand has come industry enthusiasm to further mature its intervention capabilities. This paper will review two recent case histories of separate multilateral well completion systems that enable intervention. This opens up new potential for the industry to take advantage of the cost reductions achieved with multilaterals in a much larger scope of well applications. Two separate completion systems will be covered in this paper, System A installed in a cemented multilateral junction and system B, a completion that creates a hydraulically isolated junction via either a dual string completion or a single string completion that splits into two strings. These case histories were exectuted in 2017 to 2019, and interventions were performed after one to two years of production. Detailed in each case study will be an overview of the equipment, the operational sequence, intervention outcome, and any lessons learned or improvements. The systems have demonstrated themselves as a reliable method to access laterals in non-ideal downhole environments where debris is present after the well has been on production. The tubing sizes for the case studies are 3-1/2" and 4-1/2". In each of these wells, the following operations have been successfully performed: drift testing, acid stimulation through coil tubing and breaking of a ceramic disc. Both slickline and coil tubing have been used for the interventions and in some cases with tractors. Junction inclinations range from 1 to 43 degrees. Plans for ongoing installations for the systems are being executed in the Middle East Region. Further, expansion of the system A capabilities by integrating it with other existing technologies is also planned. This will enable projects such as the installation of a trilateral well with flow control and intervention for each individual leg, and also the conversion of existing single bore wells to multilateral with intervention capability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多边系统在中东地区实现过油管干预的最新案例
从历史上看,对分支井进行干预的能力是有限的。虽然多管式(ML)造井技术已经发展到高可靠性水平,但在油井生命周期内进行干预的多管式系统的记录却非常有限。长时间生产后的干预结果不太一致。由于缺乏具有足够修井历史的技术,这意味着在需要过油管修井的应用中,通常不会选择多分支井结构。近年来,多边井结构的需求持续增长,在过去的五年里,ML井的钻井和完井数量超过了该技术历史上的任何五年。随着需求的增加,行业热情高涨,希望进一步完善其干预能力。本文将回顾最近两个独立的多边完井系统进行干预的历史案例。这为油气行业开辟了新的潜力,可以在更大范围的井应用中利用多边井段实现成本降低。本文将介绍两种独立的完井系统,系统A安装在胶结的多管接头中,系统B通过双管柱完井或单管柱完井形成水力隔离接头。这些病例记录于2017年至2019年进行,并在生产一到两年后进行干预。在每个案例研究中将详细介绍设备,操作顺序,干预结果以及吸取的经验教训或改进。该系统已被证明是一种可靠的方法,可以在生产后存在碎屑的非理想井下环境中进入水平段。案例研究的油管尺寸为3-1/2”和4-1/2”。在每口井中,都成功地进行了以下操作:漂移测试、通过盘管进行酸刺激和打破陶瓷盘。钢丝绳和盘管都被用于修井作业,在某些情况下还与牵引器一起使用。结倾角范围从1到43度。正在中东区域执行正在进行的系统安装计划。此外,还计划通过将系统A与其他现有技术集成来扩展系统A的能力。这将使诸如安装具有流量控制和修井功能的三边井,以及将现有单井转换为具有修井能力的多边井等项目成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wellbore Cleanness Under Total Losses in Horizontal Wells: The Field Study Integrating Rock Typing Methods Including Empirical, Deterministic, Statistical, Probabilistic, Predictive Techniques and New Applications for Practical Reservoir Characterization Real Time Implementation of ESP Predictive Analytics - Towards Value Realization from Data Science The Use of 5G Technologies in the Digital Transformation of the Oil/Gas Industry Recent Case Histories of Multilateral Systems Enabling Thru Tubing Intervention in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1