Advances in Rock Petrography: Image Processing Techniques for Automated Textural Thin Section Analysis

M. Mokhles, Anifowose Fatai, Masrahy Mohammed
{"title":"Advances in Rock Petrography: Image Processing Techniques for Automated Textural Thin Section Analysis","authors":"M. Mokhles, Anifowose Fatai, Masrahy Mohammed","doi":"10.2118/194835-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Point counting is time consuming and requires extensive geologist/petrographer effort. In addition, point counting results are subjective and depend on the petrographer's knowledge and expertise. In this work, we introduce a fully automated workflow for thin section textural analysis in clastic rocks, using high resolution petrographic images of the thin sections acquired with a digital camera mounted on an optical microscope. This innovative workflow reduces the thin section textural analysis turnaround time and provides an objective and consistent analysis.\n The strength of this workflow resides in its high level of automation, which offers thin section analysis tool in much less time compared to the conventional point counting. The workflow is fully automated to process and analyze the entire thin section without manual involvement. The kernel of this workflow is based on a region growing algorithm for individual grain identification. An iterative loop, built on the top of this kernel, allows the completely automated scan of the entire thin section.\n The workflow was first rigorously validated for a single thin section. Grain by grain, results from the automated analysis are compared to the petrographer (point counting) analysis. Excellent agreement between the two analyses was obtained (porosity and grain size). The efficiency of the analysis was largely in the favor of the automated approach (3 minutes) compared to the 2 hours needed by the petrographer for this counting exercise (approximately 150 grains). This first validation test proved the workflow's accuracy and the efficiency.\n This workflow was then extensively validated using large set of thin sections (50 thin sections) showing an excellent qualitative agreement with conventional point counting. This second validation test proved the robustness and the efficiency of the workflow.","PeriodicalId":11031,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194835-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Point counting is time consuming and requires extensive geologist/petrographer effort. In addition, point counting results are subjective and depend on the petrographer's knowledge and expertise. In this work, we introduce a fully automated workflow for thin section textural analysis in clastic rocks, using high resolution petrographic images of the thin sections acquired with a digital camera mounted on an optical microscope. This innovative workflow reduces the thin section textural analysis turnaround time and provides an objective and consistent analysis. The strength of this workflow resides in its high level of automation, which offers thin section analysis tool in much less time compared to the conventional point counting. The workflow is fully automated to process and analyze the entire thin section without manual involvement. The kernel of this workflow is based on a region growing algorithm for individual grain identification. An iterative loop, built on the top of this kernel, allows the completely automated scan of the entire thin section. The workflow was first rigorously validated for a single thin section. Grain by grain, results from the automated analysis are compared to the petrographer (point counting) analysis. Excellent agreement between the two analyses was obtained (porosity and grain size). The efficiency of the analysis was largely in the favor of the automated approach (3 minutes) compared to the 2 hours needed by the petrographer for this counting exercise (approximately 150 grains). This first validation test proved the workflow's accuracy and the efficiency. This workflow was then extensively validated using large set of thin sections (50 thin sections) showing an excellent qualitative agreement with conventional point counting. This second validation test proved the robustness and the efficiency of the workflow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩石岩石学进展:自动纹理薄片分析的图像处理技术
点计数是耗时的,需要地质学家/岩石学家的大量努力。此外,点计数结果是主观的,取决于岩石学家的知识和专业知识。在这项工作中,我们介绍了一个完全自动化的工作流程,用于碎屑岩的薄片纹理分析,使用安装在光学显微镜上的数码相机获得的薄片的高分辨率岩石学图像。这种创新的工作流程减少了薄片纹理分析的周转时间,并提供了客观和一致的分析。该工作流程的优势在于其高度自动化,与传统的点计数相比,它在更短的时间内提供了薄片分析工具。工作流程是完全自动化的,可以处理和分析整个薄片,而无需人工参与。该工作流的核心是基于区域增长算法的单个颗粒识别。在这个内核的顶部建立了一个迭代循环,允许对整个薄片进行完全自动化的扫描。首先对单个薄片严格验证了该工作流。一粒一粒地,自动分析的结果与岩石学家(点计数)的分析结果进行比较。两种分析结果非常一致(孔隙率和晶粒尺寸)。分析的效率在很大程度上有利于自动化方法(3分钟),而岩石学家需要2小时进行这项计数工作(大约150粒)。第一次验证测试证明了该工作流的准确性和有效性。然后,使用大量薄片(50个薄片)对该工作流程进行了广泛验证,显示出与传统点计数的极好定性一致。第二次验证测试证明了工作流的鲁棒性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size distribution analysis of microstickies treated by enzyme mixtures in papermaking whitewater Evaluating hardness and the S-test Controllable anisotropic properties of wet-laid hydroentangled nonwovens A study of the softness of household tissues using a tissue softness analyzer and hand-felt panels A REVIEW OF MULTI HOMING AND ITS ASSOCIATED RESEARCH AREAS ALONG WITH INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1