The Archangel Delusion. Descriptive Ethics and Its Role in the Education of Ethicists

Jarosław Kucharski
{"title":"The Archangel Delusion. Descriptive Ethics and Its Role in the Education of Ethicists","authors":"Jarosław Kucharski","doi":"10.21697/spch.2021.57.a.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of ethicists is to provide a genuine ethical theory to help non-ethicists interpret and solve moral dilemmas, to define what is right or wrong, and, finally, to clarify moral values. Therefore, ethicists are taught to address morality with rational procedures, to set aside their moral intuitions and emotions. Sometimes, professional ethicists are prone to falling into the archangel delusion – the belief that they are beyond the influence of their own emotions. This can lead to ousting moral intuitions from the space of ethical reflection, thus making ethicists unaware of them. They may treat intuitive beliefs about morality as an expression of primal moral feelings. The main question pursued in this article, is how those feelings may influence moral theories, which should be developed by professional ethicists. Ethicists may provide an ethical theory which is merely a rationalisation and justification for their own suppressed moral emotions, rather than the effect of genuine, rational moral reasoning. To help ethicists cope with this delusion, a model of cooperation between descriptive and normative ethics is proposed. Ethicists should therefore use the research tools of descriptive ethics to determine their own intuitions, and the moral emotions in which these intuitions are grounded. \n--------------- \nReceived: 09/06/2021. Reviewed: 23/07/2021. Accepted: 13/08/2021.","PeriodicalId":21980,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2021.57.a.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of ethicists is to provide a genuine ethical theory to help non-ethicists interpret and solve moral dilemmas, to define what is right or wrong, and, finally, to clarify moral values. Therefore, ethicists are taught to address morality with rational procedures, to set aside their moral intuitions and emotions. Sometimes, professional ethicists are prone to falling into the archangel delusion – the belief that they are beyond the influence of their own emotions. This can lead to ousting moral intuitions from the space of ethical reflection, thus making ethicists unaware of them. They may treat intuitive beliefs about morality as an expression of primal moral feelings. The main question pursued in this article, is how those feelings may influence moral theories, which should be developed by professional ethicists. Ethicists may provide an ethical theory which is merely a rationalisation and justification for their own suppressed moral emotions, rather than the effect of genuine, rational moral reasoning. To help ethicists cope with this delusion, a model of cooperation between descriptive and normative ethics is proposed. Ethicists should therefore use the research tools of descriptive ethics to determine their own intuitions, and the moral emotions in which these intuitions are grounded. --------------- Received: 09/06/2021. Reviewed: 23/07/2021. Accepted: 13/08/2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大天使错觉。描述伦理学及其在伦理学家教育中的作用
伦理学家的作用是提供一个真正的伦理理论,帮助非伦理学家解释和解决道德困境,定义什么是对的,什么是错的,并最终澄清道德价值观。因此,伦理学家被教导要用理性的程序来处理道德问题,把他们的道德直觉和情感放在一边。有时,职业伦理学家容易陷入大天使错觉——相信他们不受自己情感的影响。这可能导致道德直觉从伦理反思的空间中被驱逐,从而使伦理学家意识不到它们。他们可能将关于道德的直觉信念视为原始道德情感的表达。本文所追求的主要问题是,这些情感如何影响道德理论,这应该由职业伦理学家来发展。伦理学家可能会提供一种伦理理论,这种理论仅仅是对他们自己被压抑的道德情感的一种合理化和辩护,而不是真正的、理性的道德推理的结果。为了帮助伦理学家应对这种错觉,提出了一种描述伦理学和规范伦理学之间的合作模式。因此,伦理学家应该使用描述性伦理学的研究工具来确定他们自己的直觉,以及这些直觉所依据的道德情感。---------------收稿日期:09/06/2021。综述:23/07/2021。接受:13/08/2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrospektywna i prospektywna rola ekofilozofii Bruno Latour: New Challenges and Inspirations in Political Ecology Toward Environmental Citizenship: The Concept of Citizenship and Its Conceptualization in the Context of Global Environmental Challenges Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature Machiavelli’s The Prince: How to Refute Virtue Ethics in Three Steps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1