Douglas de Farias Medeiros, M. Villarim, F. D. De Carvalho, C. P. de Souza
{"title":"Implementation and Analysis of Routing Protocols for LoRa Wireless Mesh Networks","authors":"Douglas de Farias Medeiros, M. Villarim, F. D. De Carvalho, C. P. de Souza","doi":"10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world getting more and more connections, the growth in the number of devices sharing information with each other is evident. Therefore, as the number of connected devices and their applications grows, the amount of data shared by these devices also increases considerably. Thus, in order to be able to send data from one device to another and that data passing through intermediate devices, it is necessary to define from which path the data should be sent, characterizing the routing concept. In this context, this work aims to implement and analyze routing protocols for ad hoc wireless network called DVR (Distance Vector Routing), AODV (Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) and DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) using the Cupcarbon network simulator. LoRa wireless communication technology and a network topology distributed along avenues in the city of João Pessoa, Brazil, were considered and simulated. The quantitative analysis criteria were the packet delivery rate, the average end-to-end delay and throughput. The energy consumption profiles of each network node were also obtained according to each protocol. The results showed that the DSR protocol had lower energy consumption and AODV obtained better general performance, but with higher consumption. The DVR protocol showed better results in terms of latency.","PeriodicalId":6871,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0020-0025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In a world getting more and more connections, the growth in the number of devices sharing information with each other is evident. Therefore, as the number of connected devices and their applications grows, the amount of data shared by these devices also increases considerably. Thus, in order to be able to send data from one device to another and that data passing through intermediate devices, it is necessary to define from which path the data should be sent, characterizing the routing concept. In this context, this work aims to implement and analyze routing protocols for ad hoc wireless network called DVR (Distance Vector Routing), AODV (Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) and DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) using the Cupcarbon network simulator. LoRa wireless communication technology and a network topology distributed along avenues in the city of João Pessoa, Brazil, were considered and simulated. The quantitative analysis criteria were the packet delivery rate, the average end-to-end delay and throughput. The energy consumption profiles of each network node were also obtained according to each protocol. The results showed that the DSR protocol had lower energy consumption and AODV obtained better general performance, but with higher consumption. The DVR protocol showed better results in terms of latency.
在一个连接越来越多的世界里,相互共享信息的设备数量的增长是显而易见的。因此,随着连接的设备及其应用程序数量的增加,这些设备共享的数据量也会大幅增加。因此,为了能够将数据从一个设备发送到另一个设备,并且数据通过中间设备,有必要定义应该从哪个路径发送数据,这是路由概念的特征。在这种情况下,本工作旨在使用Cupcarbon网络模拟器实现和分析称为DVR(距离矢量路由),AODV (ad hoc按需距离矢量)和DSR(动态源路由)的自组织无线网络的路由协议。考虑并模拟了LoRa无线通信技术和沿巴西jo o Pessoa市道路分布的网络拓扑结构。定量分析的标准是数据包传输速率、端到端平均延迟和吞吐量。并根据各协议得到各网络节点的能耗曲线。结果表明,DSR协议能耗较低,AODV协议总体性能较好,但能耗较高。DVR协议在延迟方面表现出更好的结果。