Microbial contamination of the Tzu-Chi Cord Blood Bank from 2005 to 2006.

Shu‐Huey Chen, Ya-Jun Zheng, Shang-hsien Yang, Kuo‐Liang Yang, M. Shyr, Y. Ho
{"title":"Microbial contamination of the Tzu-Chi Cord Blood Bank from 2005 to 2006.","authors":"Shu‐Huey Chen, Ya-Jun Zheng, Shang-hsien Yang, Kuo‐Liang Yang, M. Shyr, Y. Ho","doi":"10.7097/APT.200802.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn total, 4502 units of cord blood (CB) were collected during a 2-year period from 2005 to 2006 by the Buddhist Tzu-Chi Stem Cells Center. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of microbial contamination and type of organism present in the cord blood. The clinical impact of microbial contamination on hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts used for HPC transplantation is also discussed.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFirst and second specimens were obtained for microbial assessment. These were collected in laboratory after cord blood collection and after cord blood unit manipulation, respectively. The samples were cultured and the results reviewed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe overall incidence of microbiological contamination was 1.8% (82/4502). Three CB units were contaminated with two different organisms. Infectious organisms comprised 9.4% (8/85) of total isolated microbes. These infectious microorganisms were beta-Streptococci group B, Candida tropicalis and Staphylococcus aureus which were isolated in 6, 1 and 1 of CB units respectively. Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus, beta-Streptococcus Group B, Bacteroides valgatus, Corynebacterium spp., Klebsiella pneumonia and Peptococcus spp. were the most frequently encountered microorganisms. A higher contamination rate of the CB units was noted after vaginal delivery (2.16%) compared to caesarian section (0.85%) (p < 0.01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nExtensive training in CB collection, good procedures and good protocols can decrease the rate of microbial contamination. The use of a closed collecting system and an ex utero method have the advantage of a lower contamination rate. In our cord blood bank, we use a closed system but an in utero method. Similar to other studies, most of microorganisms reported here as contaminants are non-pathogenic.","PeriodicalId":7156,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica Taiwanica = Taiwan er ke yi xue hui za zhi","volume":"63 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica Taiwanica = Taiwan er ke yi xue hui za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7097/APT.200802.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

BACKGROUND In total, 4502 units of cord blood (CB) were collected during a 2-year period from 2005 to 2006 by the Buddhist Tzu-Chi Stem Cells Center. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of microbial contamination and type of organism present in the cord blood. The clinical impact of microbial contamination on hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts used for HPC transplantation is also discussed. METHODS First and second specimens were obtained for microbial assessment. These were collected in laboratory after cord blood collection and after cord blood unit manipulation, respectively. The samples were cultured and the results reviewed. RESULTS The overall incidence of microbiological contamination was 1.8% (82/4502). Three CB units were contaminated with two different organisms. Infectious organisms comprised 9.4% (8/85) of total isolated microbes. These infectious microorganisms were beta-Streptococci group B, Candida tropicalis and Staphylococcus aureus which were isolated in 6, 1 and 1 of CB units respectively. Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus, beta-Streptococcus Group B, Bacteroides valgatus, Corynebacterium spp., Klebsiella pneumonia and Peptococcus spp. were the most frequently encountered microorganisms. A higher contamination rate of the CB units was noted after vaginal delivery (2.16%) compared to caesarian section (0.85%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Extensive training in CB collection, good procedures and good protocols can decrease the rate of microbial contamination. The use of a closed collecting system and an ex utero method have the advantage of a lower contamination rate. In our cord blood bank, we use a closed system but an in utero method. Similar to other studies, most of microorganisms reported here as contaminants are non-pathogenic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子池脐带血库2005年至2006年微生物污染情况。
在2005年至2006年的2年间,佛教慈济干细胞中心共收集了4502单位脐带血(CB)。本研究的目的是分析脐带血中微生物污染的发生率和存在的生物体类型。本文还讨论了微生物污染对用于造血祖细胞移植的移植物的临床影响。方法采集第1、2份标本进行微生物鉴定。这些分别在脐带血采集和脐带血单位操作后在实验室收集。对样品进行了培养,并对结果进行了审查。结果总微生物污染发生率为1.8%(82/4502)。三个CB单位被两种不同的生物污染。感染菌占分离微生物总数的9.4%(8/85)。感染微生物分别为β - B群链球菌、热带念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,分别在6、1和1个CB单位中分离得到。大肠杆菌、脆弱拟杆菌、乳杆菌、肠球菌、乙型链球菌、变形拟杆菌、棒状杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和胃球菌是最常见的微生物。阴道分娩后的CB单位污染率(2.16%)高于剖宫产(0.85%)(p < 0.01)。结论加强CB收集培训,完善流程和方案,可降低微生物污染发生率。使用封闭收集系统和体外方法具有污染率较低的优点。在我们的脐带血银行,我们使用一个封闭的系统,但在子宫内的方法。与其他研究类似,这里报道的大多数作为污染物的微生物是非致病性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kawasaki disease. [Determination of brain death in children]. [Pediatric asthma and obesity]. Microbial contamination of the Tzu-Chi Cord Blood Bank from 2005 to 2006. Relationship between umbilical cord blood insulin-like growth factors and anthropometry in term newborns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1