Mitigating Impacts of Projects on Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda

F. R. Muwanika, F. Mwaura, F. Ogwal, M. Masiga, M. Akullo, Okurut To
{"title":"Mitigating Impacts of Projects on Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda","authors":"F. R. Muwanika, F. Mwaura, F. Ogwal, M. Masiga, M. Akullo, Okurut To","doi":"10.4172/2157-7625.1000232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study provides light on the impact of implemented projects on biodiversity in Uganda in terms of harmful and enhancing projects. Biodiversity harmful projects are defined as the types of projects that destroy or led to biodiversity loss during their implementation. While biodiversity enhancing are projects that lead to biological diversity during their implementation. \nObjective: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of implemented projects in the communities on biodiversity conservation and management in Uganda. \nMethods: The data used in this analysis was obtained from Uganda Bureau of statistics (UBOS) previously collected during the National Service Delivery Survey. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to derive the different impact dimensions of projects on biodiversity among the communities in Uganda. \nResults: Implemented projects in the communities impact on biodiversity both positively and negatively. Findings revealed that livestock improvement/restocking/breeding contribute about 30% on the biodiversity positive impacts while introduction of improved crop variety at about 20% and agricultural technology at about 11.4%. Furthermore, construction of new road/bridges are the leading projects in destroying biodiversity accounting for about 13.5% of the variation in negative impacts while construction of toilet/latrines and health units accounts for 11.8% and 9.4%, respectively of the variation in biodiversity loss. \nConclusions and recommendations: Construction related projects impact negatively on biodiversity in their implementation while agricultural related projects are the leading agro-biodiversity enhancing projects in Uganda. This implies that works sector must play an important role in biodiversity conservation in Uganda. Secondly, construction and agriculture related projects should endeavour to allocate a percentage of the project budget equivalent to expected impact on biodiversity towards its management and restoration.","PeriodicalId":15637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study provides light on the impact of implemented projects on biodiversity in Uganda in terms of harmful and enhancing projects. Biodiversity harmful projects are defined as the types of projects that destroy or led to biodiversity loss during their implementation. While biodiversity enhancing are projects that lead to biological diversity during their implementation. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of implemented projects in the communities on biodiversity conservation and management in Uganda. Methods: The data used in this analysis was obtained from Uganda Bureau of statistics (UBOS) previously collected during the National Service Delivery Survey. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to derive the different impact dimensions of projects on biodiversity among the communities in Uganda. Results: Implemented projects in the communities impact on biodiversity both positively and negatively. Findings revealed that livestock improvement/restocking/breeding contribute about 30% on the biodiversity positive impacts while introduction of improved crop variety at about 20% and agricultural technology at about 11.4%. Furthermore, construction of new road/bridges are the leading projects in destroying biodiversity accounting for about 13.5% of the variation in negative impacts while construction of toilet/latrines and health units accounts for 11.8% and 9.4%, respectively of the variation in biodiversity loss. Conclusions and recommendations: Construction related projects impact negatively on biodiversity in their implementation while agricultural related projects are the leading agro-biodiversity enhancing projects in Uganda. This implies that works sector must play an important role in biodiversity conservation in Uganda. Secondly, construction and agriculture related projects should endeavour to allocate a percentage of the project budget equivalent to expected impact on biodiversity towards its management and restoration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻项目对乌干达生物多样性保护的影响
引言:本研究从有害项目和增强项目两方面阐述了实施项目对乌干达生物多样性的影响。生物多样性有害项目是指在实施过程中破坏或导致生物多样性丧失的项目类型。加强生物多样性是指在实施过程中导致生物多样性的项目。目的:本研究的目的是评估乌干达社区实施的项目对生物多样性保护和管理的影响。方法:本分析中使用的数据来自乌干达统计局(UBOS)先前在全国服务提供调查期间收集的数据。采用多重对应分析(MCA),得出了项目对乌干达社区生物多样性的不同影响维度。结果:在社区实施的项目对生物多样性既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响。结果表明,牲畜改良/再放养/育种对生物多样性的积极影响贡献约30%,改良作物品种的引进贡献约20%,农业技术贡献约11.4%。此外,新建道路/桥梁是破坏生物多样性的主要项目,约占负面影响变化的13.5%,而厕所/厕所和卫生设施的建设分别占生物多样性损失变化的11.8%和9.4%。结论与建议:与建筑相关的项目在实施过程中会对生物多样性产生负面影响,而与农业相关的项目是乌干达农业生物多样性增强的主要项目。这意味着工程部门必须在乌干达的生物多样性保护中发挥重要作用。第二,与建筑和农业有关的项目应努力将项目预算中相当于对生物多样性的预期影响的百分比用于生物多样性的管理和恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Status of Camel Feed Resources, and Its Management in Ethiopia Somali Region The Impact of Variant Local Involvement in Community Based Ecotourism: A Conceptual Framework Approach Physical Concepts and Ecosystem Ecology: A Revival? Complete genome sequence of Alkalitalea saponilacus, an anaerobic haloalkaliphilic bacterium capable of secreting halostable xylanase Critically Analyse the Different Approaches of Eco Health, One Health, Planetary Health and Political Economy and Political Ecology of Global Health to Analyse Current Challenges in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1