{"title":"Whatever It Is We Owe to Animals, It’s Not to Eat Them","authors":"Adrian Kreutz","doi":"10.5406/21601267.12.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In an article published in the Journal of the American Philosophical Association, Nick Zangwill (2021) argues that “eating meat is morally good” (p. 295). It is “our duty” to eat animals, he says, “when it is part of a practice that has benefited animals” (Zangwill, 2021, p. 295). Since certain animals can be said to exist in some sense only because of meat-eating practices, and those practices benefit animals if they have good lives, argues Zangwill, that’s why we owe it to the animals to eat them—it is our moral duty. I carefully dissect this crude argument into its components and debunk its conclusion.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"11 1","pages":"123 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.12.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:In an article published in the Journal of the American Philosophical Association, Nick Zangwill (2021) argues that “eating meat is morally good” (p. 295). It is “our duty” to eat animals, he says, “when it is part of a practice that has benefited animals” (Zangwill, 2021, p. 295). Since certain animals can be said to exist in some sense only because of meat-eating practices, and those practices benefit animals if they have good lives, argues Zangwill, that’s why we owe it to the animals to eat them—it is our moral duty. I carefully dissect this crude argument into its components and debunk its conclusion.
摘要:在《美国哲学协会杂志》上发表的一篇文章中,Nick Zangwill(2021)认为“吃肉在道德上是好的”(第295页)。他说,吃动物是“我们的责任”,“当它是有益于动物的实践的一部分”(Zangwill, 2021, p. 295)。由于某些动物在某种意义上可以说只是因为吃肉的习惯而存在,而如果这些习惯有益于动物的好生活,Zangwill认为,这就是为什么我们对动物有责任吃它们——这是我们的道德责任。我仔细剖析了这个粗糙的论点的组成部分,并揭穿了它的结论。