Revocable Certificateless Public Key Encryption with Equality Test

IF 2 4区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Information Technology and Control Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.5755/j01.itc.51.4.30691
Tung-Tso Tsai, Han-Yu Lin, Han-Ching Tsai
{"title":"Revocable Certificateless Public Key Encryption with Equality Test","authors":"Tung-Tso Tsai, Han-Yu Lin, Han-Ching Tsai","doi":"10.5755/j01.itc.51.4.30691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional public key cryptography requires certificates as a link between each user’s identity and her/his public key. Typically, public key infrastructures (PKI) are used to manage and maintain certificates. However, it takes a lot of resources to build PKI which includes many roles and complex policies. The concept of certificateless public key encryption (CL-PKC) was introduced to eliminate the need for certificates. Based on this concept, a mechanism called certificateless public key encryption with equality test (CL-PKEET) was proposed to ensure the confidentiality of private data and provide an equality test of different ciphertexts. The mechanism is suitable for cloud applications where users cannot only protect personal private data but also enjoy cloud services which test the equality of different ciphertexts. More specifically, any two ciphertexts can be tested to determine whether they are encrypted from the same plaintext. Indeed, any practical system needs to provide a solution to revoke compromised users. However, these existing CL-PKEET schemes do not address the revocation problem, and the related research is scant. Therefore, the aim of this article is to propose the first revocable CL-PKEET scheme called RCL-PKEET which can effectively remove illegal users from the system while maintaining the effectiveness of existing CL-PKEET schemes in encryption, decryption, and equality testing processes. Additionally, we formally demonstrate the security of the proposed scheme under the bilinear Diffie-Hellman assumption.","PeriodicalId":54982,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology and Control","volume":"8 1","pages":"638-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology and Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.51.4.30691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional public key cryptography requires certificates as a link between each user’s identity and her/his public key. Typically, public key infrastructures (PKI) are used to manage and maintain certificates. However, it takes a lot of resources to build PKI which includes many roles and complex policies. The concept of certificateless public key encryption (CL-PKC) was introduced to eliminate the need for certificates. Based on this concept, a mechanism called certificateless public key encryption with equality test (CL-PKEET) was proposed to ensure the confidentiality of private data and provide an equality test of different ciphertexts. The mechanism is suitable for cloud applications where users cannot only protect personal private data but also enjoy cloud services which test the equality of different ciphertexts. More specifically, any two ciphertexts can be tested to determine whether they are encrypted from the same plaintext. Indeed, any practical system needs to provide a solution to revoke compromised users. However, these existing CL-PKEET schemes do not address the revocation problem, and the related research is scant. Therefore, the aim of this article is to propose the first revocable CL-PKEET scheme called RCL-PKEET which can effectively remove illegal users from the system while maintaining the effectiveness of existing CL-PKEET schemes in encryption, decryption, and equality testing processes. Additionally, we formally demonstrate the security of the proposed scheme under the bilinear Diffie-Hellman assumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有相等性测试的可撤销的无证书公钥加密
传统的公钥加密需要证书作为每个用户的身份与其公钥之间的链接。通常,使用公钥基础设施PKI (public key infrastructure)来管理和维护证书。但是,PKI的构建需要大量的资源,其中包括许多角色和复杂的策略。引入无证书公钥加密(CL-PKC)的概念是为了消除对证书的需求。在此基础上,提出了一种具有相等性检验的无证书公钥加密机制(CL-PKEET),以保证私有数据的机密性,并提供不同密文的相等性检验。该机制适用于云应用,用户不仅可以保护个人隐私数据,还可以享受云服务,测试不同密文的平等性。更具体地说,可以测试任意两个密文,以确定它们是否由相同的明文加密。实际上,任何实际的系统都需要提供一个解决方案来撤销受损的用户。然而,现有的这些CL-PKEET方案并没有解决撤销问题,相关的研究也很少。因此,本文的目的是提出第一个可撤销的CL-PKEET方案,称为RCL-PKEET,它可以有效地从系统中删除非法用户,同时保持现有CL-PKEET方案在加密,解密和相等性测试过程中的有效性。此外,我们在双线性Diffie-Hellman假设下正式证明了所提方案的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Technology and Control
Information Technology and Control 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Periodical journal covers a wide field of computer science and control systems related problems including: -Software and hardware engineering; -Management systems engineering; -Information systems and databases; -Embedded systems; -Physical systems modelling and application; -Computer networks and cloud computing; -Data visualization; -Human-computer interface; -Computer graphics, visual analytics, and multimedia systems.
期刊最新文献
Model construction of big data asset management system for digital power grid regulation Melanoma Diagnosis Using Enhanced Faster Region Convolutional Neural Networks Optimized by Artificial Gorilla Troops Algorithm A Scalable and Stacked Ensemble Approach to Improve Intrusion Detection in Clouds Traffic Sign Detection Algorithm Based on Improved Yolox Apply Physical System Model and Computer Algorithm to Identify Osmanthus Fragrans Seed Vigor Based on Hyperspectral Imaging and Convolutional Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1