Tensile Properties of 3D Printed Polymeric Pieces: Comparison of Several Testing Setups

A. Romero, M. Piovan, C. Mainetti, Darío Stechina, Sandra M. Mendoza, H. Martin, Norberto C Maggi
{"title":"Tensile Properties of 3D Printed Polymeric Pieces: Comparison of Several Testing Setups","authors":"A. Romero, M. Piovan, C. Mainetti, Darío Stechina, Sandra M. Mendoza, H. Martin, Norberto C Maggi","doi":"10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N1.84467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to evaluate and compare variations of a methodology for performing tensile tests on thermoplastic specimens constructed by additive manufacturing technologies (AMT) with filament deposition modeling (FDM). The testing procedures of pieces made in FDM machines do not yet have any conclusive standards because 3D printing, as a disruptive and exponentially growing technology, has not allowed enough time to reach a definitive scientific consensus. Nowadays, testing standards for injected thermoplastic parts or laminated composites are employed as substitutes with careful implementation. A comparative study was carried out on the elasticity modulus, determined within the framework of the same standard but with different measuring devices and testing machines. These machines cover a broad range from professional automated high precision machines to lab and specialized machines. Sets of 3D-printed specimens with identical manufacturing parameters were constructed in a commercial 3D printer. An analysis of variance was performed in order to evaluate the consistency and significance of experimental data for the same polymer, considering the machine type and its corresponding setup. From the experimental data, it is concluded that, with the due care, all evaluated testing setups can reach comparable results, especially in the absence of sophisticated and expensive measuring systems.","PeriodicalId":21285,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N1.84467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This work aims to evaluate and compare variations of a methodology for performing tensile tests on thermoplastic specimens constructed by additive manufacturing technologies (AMT) with filament deposition modeling (FDM). The testing procedures of pieces made in FDM machines do not yet have any conclusive standards because 3D printing, as a disruptive and exponentially growing technology, has not allowed enough time to reach a definitive scientific consensus. Nowadays, testing standards for injected thermoplastic parts or laminated composites are employed as substitutes with careful implementation. A comparative study was carried out on the elasticity modulus, determined within the framework of the same standard but with different measuring devices and testing machines. These machines cover a broad range from professional automated high precision machines to lab and specialized machines. Sets of 3D-printed specimens with identical manufacturing parameters were constructed in a commercial 3D printer. An analysis of variance was performed in order to evaluate the consistency and significance of experimental data for the same polymer, considering the machine type and its corresponding setup. From the experimental data, it is concluded that, with the due care, all evaluated testing setups can reach comparable results, especially in the absence of sophisticated and expensive measuring systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D打印聚合物片的拉伸性能:几种测试设置的比较
这项工作旨在评估和比较通过增材制造技术(AMT)和长丝沉积建模(FDM)构建的热塑性试样进行拉伸试验的方法的变化。由于3D打印作为一项颠覆性的、呈指数级增长的技术,还没有足够的时间来达成明确的科学共识,所以在FDM机器上制造的零件的测试程序还没有任何决定性的标准。目前,以热塑性注塑件或层合复合材料的检测标准作为替代,并认真执行。在同一标准的框架下,采用不同的测量装置和测试设备,对弹性模量进行了对比研究。这些机器涵盖了从专业自动化高精度机器到实验室和专业机器的广泛范围。在商用3D打印机中构建具有相同制造参数的3D打印标本集。考虑到机器类型及其相应的设置,为了评估同一聚合物实验数据的一致性和意义,进行了方差分析。从实验数据中可以得出结论,通过适当的谨慎,所有评估的测试装置都可以达到可比的结果,特别是在没有复杂和昂贵的测量系统的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Operated with Ternary Higher Alcohol Biofuel Blends A Gender Gap Analysis on Academic Performance in Engineering Students on Admission and Exit Standardized Tests Identification of Eroded and Erosion Risk Areas Using Remote Sensing and GIS in the Quebrada Seca watershed A Hybrid-Flipped Classroom Approach: Students’ Perception and Performance Assessment Towards a Theory of Interoperability of Software Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1