Can the intake of synthetic food colour Amaranth (INS 123) put the health of Brazilian consumers at risk?

Patrícia da Silva Rodrigues, A. de Oliveira Rios, F. Cladera-Olivera
{"title":"Can the intake of synthetic food colour Amaranth (INS 123) put the health of Brazilian consumers at risk?","authors":"Patrícia da Silva Rodrigues, A. de Oliveira Rios, F. Cladera-Olivera","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2022.2068807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Amaranth is a synthetic red azo dye approved in several countries such as Canada, Australia and Brazil, but banned in the United States. There are few studies evaluating the exposure of the general population to this food colouring substance, in Brazil, specifically, there are virtually no data on its intake. This study aimed to estimate the Theoretical Maximum Daily Intake (TMDI) of the Brazilian population and to quantify Amaranth in foods that contribute the most to its consumption. Data on the presence of Amaranth were correlated with consumption data from National Household Budget Surveys carried out in 2008/2009 and 2017/2018, among people aged ten or older. The results show that the mean TMDI (mg/day) of Amaranth does not exceed the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) in any population group, it, however, may get as high as 66% of the ADI among teenagers. For the TMDI balanced by the prevalence of food consumption, that is, considering consumers only (eaters only, rather than the population mean), results show that the amounts can exceed the ADI in all population groups studied. The intake of Amaranth is higher among the younger population (adolescents) reaching up to three times the ADI in the worst-case scenario. The food groups which contribute the most to the intake of Amaranth, are ‘juices/artificial juices/reconstituted powdered juice mixes’ and ‘soft drinks’. Laboratory tests of powdered fruit mixes and soft drinks sold in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil) show that 17 out of 20 samples tested exceeded the limit set by Brazilian regulations (5 mg/100 mL in the final product). Results show that the intake of Amaranth by the different Brazilian populations may pose a health hazard to several population groups.","PeriodicalId":12121,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","volume":"8 1","pages":"1222 - 1238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2068807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Amaranth is a synthetic red azo dye approved in several countries such as Canada, Australia and Brazil, but banned in the United States. There are few studies evaluating the exposure of the general population to this food colouring substance, in Brazil, specifically, there are virtually no data on its intake. This study aimed to estimate the Theoretical Maximum Daily Intake (TMDI) of the Brazilian population and to quantify Amaranth in foods that contribute the most to its consumption. Data on the presence of Amaranth were correlated with consumption data from National Household Budget Surveys carried out in 2008/2009 and 2017/2018, among people aged ten or older. The results show that the mean TMDI (mg/day) of Amaranth does not exceed the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) in any population group, it, however, may get as high as 66% of the ADI among teenagers. For the TMDI balanced by the prevalence of food consumption, that is, considering consumers only (eaters only, rather than the population mean), results show that the amounts can exceed the ADI in all population groups studied. The intake of Amaranth is higher among the younger population (adolescents) reaching up to three times the ADI in the worst-case scenario. The food groups which contribute the most to the intake of Amaranth, are ‘juices/artificial juices/reconstituted powdered juice mixes’ and ‘soft drinks’. Laboratory tests of powdered fruit mixes and soft drinks sold in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil) show that 17 out of 20 samples tested exceeded the limit set by Brazilian regulations (5 mg/100 mL in the final product). Results show that the intake of Amaranth by the different Brazilian populations may pose a health hazard to several population groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摄入合成食用色素苋菜花(INS 123)是否会危及巴西消费者的健康?
苋菜花是一种合成的红色偶氮染料,在加拿大、澳大利亚和巴西等几个国家得到批准,但在美国被禁止使用。很少有研究评估一般人群接触这种食用色素的情况,特别是在巴西,几乎没有关于其摄入量的数据。本研究旨在估计巴西人口的理论最大每日摄入量(TMDI),并量化对其消费贡献最大的食物中的苋菜。紫红花存在的数据与2008/2009年和2017/2018年在10岁或以上人群中进行的全国家庭预算调查的消费数据相关。结果表明,紫红花的平均TMDI (mg/day)在任何人群中都不超过可接受的每日摄入量(ADI),但在青少年中可能高达ADI的66%。对于以食物消费的流行程度来平衡的TMDI,即只考虑消费者(只考虑食用者,而不是人口平均值),结果表明,在所研究的所有人群中,其含量都可能超过ADI。在最坏的情况下,年轻人群(青少年)的苋菜摄入量最高可达每日推荐摄入量的三倍。对苋菜摄入量贡献最大的食物类别是“果汁/人工果汁/重组混合果汁粉”和“软饮料”。对在巴西阿雷格里港市销售的粉状水果混合物和软饮料进行的实验室测试表明,在测试的20个样品中,有17个超过了巴西法规规定的限值(最终产品中每100毫升含有5毫克)。结果表明,巴西不同人群对苋菜的摄入可能会对几个人群造成健康危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infant nutrition at risk: a global systematic review of ochratoxin A in human breast milk-human health risk assessment. Determination and evaluation of canthaxanthin and β-apo-8'-carotenoid ethyl ester in chicken eggs and meat in Tianjin. A worldwide systematic review of ochratoxin A in various coffee products - human exposure and health risk assessment. Determination of azodicarbonamide in flour samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with xanthydrol pre-column derivatisation. Food process contaminants: formation, occurrence, risk assessment and mitigation strategies – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1