Treatment and control of diabetes in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

R. Daniel, K. Mani, P. Aggarwal, S. Gupta
{"title":"Treatment and control of diabetes in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"R. Daniel, K. Mani, P. Aggarwal, S. Gupta","doi":"10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes is a major contributor to hospital admissions, out-of-pocket expenditure, and premature mortality in India. Proper treatment and adequate control rates are needed to reduce the complications and deaths due to diabetes. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies to estimate the treatment and control rate of diabetes among adults in India. Methods: A systematic electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to retrieve community-based studies which reported the prevalence of treatment and control of diabetes among adults in India, without any date or language restriction. To estimate the pooled prevalence and heterogeneity, the random-effects model and I2 statistic methods were employed. We did subgroup analyses based on study setting and type of blood test. Results: We included seven studies in this meta-analysis, which comprised a total of 9,033 participants. The pooled prevalence of treatment and control of diabetes among adults in India was 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.8%–86.2%) and 56.4% (95% CI: 44.7%–67.9%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis based on the study setting revealed a decrease in heterogeneity among the urban studies for the control of diabetes. Conclusions: Three-fourths of the diagnosed (self-reported) diabetic patients were on treatment. Of these, half of the patients had adequate glycemic control. Targeted actions need to focus on the determinants of adherence to medication and follow-up.","PeriodicalId":93784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"41 1","pages":"69 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a major contributor to hospital admissions, out-of-pocket expenditure, and premature mortality in India. Proper treatment and adequate control rates are needed to reduce the complications and deaths due to diabetes. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies to estimate the treatment and control rate of diabetes among adults in India. Methods: A systematic electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to retrieve community-based studies which reported the prevalence of treatment and control of diabetes among adults in India, without any date or language restriction. To estimate the pooled prevalence and heterogeneity, the random-effects model and I2 statistic methods were employed. We did subgroup analyses based on study setting and type of blood test. Results: We included seven studies in this meta-analysis, which comprised a total of 9,033 participants. The pooled prevalence of treatment and control of diabetes among adults in India was 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.8%–86.2%) and 56.4% (95% CI: 44.7%–67.9%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis based on the study setting revealed a decrease in heterogeneity among the urban studies for the control of diabetes. Conclusions: Three-fourths of the diagnosed (self-reported) diabetic patients were on treatment. Of these, half of the patients had adequate glycemic control. Targeted actions need to focus on the determinants of adherence to medication and follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度糖尿病的治疗和控制:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:糖尿病是印度住院、自费和过早死亡的主要原因。为减少糖尿病并发症和死亡,需要适当的治疗和适当的控制率。因此,我们对基于社区的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以估计印度成年人糖尿病的治疗和控制率。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌Scholar中进行系统的电子检索,检索以社区为基础的研究,这些研究报告了印度成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的患病率,没有任何日期或语言限制。为了估计合并患病率和异质性,采用随机效应模型和I2统计方法。我们根据研究环境和血液测试类型进行了亚组分析。结果:我们在本荟萃分析中纳入了7项研究,共9033名参与者。印度成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的总患病率分别为75.9%(95%可信区间[CI]: 63.8%-86.2%)和56.4% (95% CI: 44.7%-67.9%)。研究之间存在显著的异质性(P < 0.001)。基于研究环境的亚组分析显示,城市研究中糖尿病控制的异质性有所降低。结论:四分之三的确诊(自述)糖尿病患者接受了治疗。其中,一半的患者血糖控制良好。有针对性的行动需要侧重于坚持用药和随访的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care setup: A cross-sectional observational single-center-based study in Eastern India Knowledge and perceptions of medical students about generic medicines in a medical college in North India Acute undifferentiated fever presenting as multi-organ dysfunction: Narrowing the differential diagnosis A study on patients with pleural effusion with emphasis on pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and pleural biopsy Corticosteroid-induced avascular bone necrosis and possible association with prior COVID-19 infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1