Specifying memory consistency of write buffer multiprocessors

IF 2 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Transactions on Computer Systems Pub Date : 2007-02-01 DOI:10.1145/1189736.1189737
L. Higham, L. Jackson, J. Kawash
{"title":"Specifying memory consistency of write buffer multiprocessors","authors":"L. Higham, L. Jackson, J. Kawash","doi":"10.1145/1189736.1189737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Write buffering is one of many successful mechanisms that improves the performance and scalability of multiprocessors. However, it leads to more complex memory system behavior, which cannot be described using intuitive consistency models, such as Sequential Consistency. It is crucial to provide programmers with a specification of the exact behavior of such complex memories. This article presents a uniform framework for describing systems at different levels of abstraction and proving their equivalence. The framework is used to derive and prove correct simple specifications in terms of program-level instructions of the sparc total store order and partial store order memories.The framework is also used to examine the sparc relaxed memory order. We show that it is not a memory consistency model that corresponds to any implementation on a multiprocessor that uses write-buffers, even though we suspect that the sparc version 9 specification of relaxed memory order was intended to capture a general write-buffer architecture. The same technique is used to show that Coherence does not correspond to a write-buffer architecture. A corollary, which follows from the relationship between Coherence and Alpha, is that any implementation of Alpha consistency using write-buffers cannot produce all possible Alpha computations. That is, there are some computations that satisfy the Alpha specification but cannot occur in the given write-buffer implementation.","PeriodicalId":50918,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1189736.1189737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Write buffering is one of many successful mechanisms that improves the performance and scalability of multiprocessors. However, it leads to more complex memory system behavior, which cannot be described using intuitive consistency models, such as Sequential Consistency. It is crucial to provide programmers with a specification of the exact behavior of such complex memories. This article presents a uniform framework for describing systems at different levels of abstraction and proving their equivalence. The framework is used to derive and prove correct simple specifications in terms of program-level instructions of the sparc total store order and partial store order memories.The framework is also used to examine the sparc relaxed memory order. We show that it is not a memory consistency model that corresponds to any implementation on a multiprocessor that uses write-buffers, even though we suspect that the sparc version 9 specification of relaxed memory order was intended to capture a general write-buffer architecture. The same technique is used to show that Coherence does not correspond to a write-buffer architecture. A corollary, which follows from the relationship between Coherence and Alpha, is that any implementation of Alpha consistency using write-buffers cannot produce all possible Alpha computations. That is, there are some computations that satisfy the Alpha specification but cannot occur in the given write-buffer implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指定写缓冲区多处理器的内存一致性
写缓冲是提高多处理器性能和可伸缩性的众多成功机制之一。然而,它会导致更复杂的内存系统行为,这些行为无法用直观的一致性模型(如顺序一致性)来描述。为程序员提供这种复杂内存的确切行为规范是至关重要的。本文提出了一个统一的框架,用于描述不同抽象层次的系统并证明它们的等价性。该框架用于推导和证明基于sparc总存储顺序和部分存储顺序存储器的程序级指令的简单规范。该框架还用于检查空间放松记忆顺序。我们表明,它不是一个内存一致性模型,它与使用写缓冲区的多处理器上的任何实现都不相对应,尽管我们怀疑放宽内存顺序的sparc版本9规范旨在捕获通用的写缓冲区体系结构。同样的技术也用于证明Coherence并不对应于写缓冲区架构。从Coherence和Alpha之间的关系得出的推论是,任何使用写缓冲区实现Alpha一致性都不能产生所有可能的Alpha计算。也就是说,有一些计算满足Alpha规范,但不能在给定的写缓冲区实现中发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS) presents research and development results on the design, implementation, analysis, evaluation, and use of computer systems and systems software. The term "computer systems" is interpreted broadly and includes operating systems, systems architecture and hardware, distributed systems, optimizing compilers, and the interaction between systems and computer networks. Articles appearing in TOCS will tend either to present new techniques and concepts, or to report on experiences and experiments with actual systems. Insights useful to system designers, builders, and users will be emphasized. TOCS publishes research and technical papers, both short and long. It includes technical correspondence to permit commentary on technical topics and on previously published papers.
期刊最新文献
PMAlloc: A Holistic Approach to Improving Persistent Memory Allocation Trinity: High-Performance and Reliable Mobile Emulation through Graphics Projection Hardware-software Collaborative Tiered-memory Management Framework for Virtualization Diciclo: Flexible User-level Services for Efficient Multitenant Isolation Modeling the Interplay between Loop Tiling and Fusion in Optimizing Compilers Using Affine Relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1