Conceptualizing Biological Aging and Frailty in Orthopaedics

Ting Cong, Arielle J. Hall, Zhimeng Jia, A. Christiano, H. Elsevier, Zoe B. Cheung, Davis S. Wellman, David A. Forsh, J. Lane
{"title":"Conceptualizing Biological Aging and Frailty in Orthopaedics","authors":"Ting Cong, Arielle J. Hall, Zhimeng Jia, A. Christiano, H. Elsevier, Zoe B. Cheung, Davis S. Wellman, David A. Forsh, J. Lane","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.21.01053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"➤ Biological aging can best be conceptualized clinically as a combination of 3 components: frailty, comorbidity, and disability.➤ Despite advancements in the understanding of senescence, chronological age remains the best estimate of biological age. However, a useful exercise for practitioners is to look beyond chronological age in clinical and surgical decision-making.➤ A chronologically aging person does not age biologically at the same rate.➤ The best way to understand frailty is to consider it as a physical phenotype.➤ Physical optimization should parallel medical optimization before elective surgery.➤ The poorer the host (both in terms of bone quality and propensity for healing), the more robust the implant construct must be to minimize reliance on host biology.","PeriodicalId":22579,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"54 1","pages":"1212 - 1222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

➤ Biological aging can best be conceptualized clinically as a combination of 3 components: frailty, comorbidity, and disability.➤ Despite advancements in the understanding of senescence, chronological age remains the best estimate of biological age. However, a useful exercise for practitioners is to look beyond chronological age in clinical and surgical decision-making.➤ A chronologically aging person does not age biologically at the same rate.➤ The best way to understand frailty is to consider it as a physical phenotype.➤ Physical optimization should parallel medical optimization before elective surgery.➤ The poorer the host (both in terms of bone quality and propensity for healing), the more robust the implant construct must be to minimize reliance on host biology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化骨科的生物老化和脆弱
生物学衰老在临床上可以最好地定义为三个组成部分的结合:虚弱、共病和残疾。尽管对衰老的理解有所进步,但实足年龄仍然是对生物年龄的最佳估计。然而,对于从业者来说,一个有用的练习是在临床和手术决策中超越实足年龄。一个按时间顺序衰老的人在生物学上并不以同样的速度衰老。理解脆弱的最好方法是把它看作一种生理表型。➤择期手术前身体优化应与医疗优化并行。宿主越差(在骨质量和愈合倾向方面),种植体结构必须越坚固,以尽量减少对宿主生物学的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Obesity on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rate A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes In Adults Aged <65 Years with Unstable Ankle Fractures, Fibular Nailing Did Not Differ from Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Functional Outcome at 1 Year In Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft, Knee Flexion Angle of 0° Versus 30° During Tibial ACL Graft Fixation Did Not Differ for KOOS Subscales, but Improved Activity Level In Patients with Displaced Type-II Distal Clavicle Fractures, Operative and Nonoperative Therapies Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 1 Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1