Pipeline Dreams: Occupational Plans and Gender Differences in STEM Major Persistence and Completion

IF 3.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sociology of Education Pub Date : 2020-06-03 DOI:10.1177/0038040720928484
Kim A. Weeden, Dafna Gelbgiser, S. Morgan
{"title":"Pipeline Dreams: Occupational Plans and Gender Differences in STEM Major Persistence and Completion","authors":"Kim A. Weeden, Dafna Gelbgiser, S. Morgan","doi":"10.1177/0038040720928484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, women are more likely than men to enter and complete college, but they remain underrepresented among baccalaureates in science-related majors. We show that in a cohort of college entrants who graduated from high school in 2004, men were more than twice as likely as women to complete baccalaureate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, including premed fields, and more likely to persist in STEM/biomed after entering these majors by sophomore year. Conversely, women were more than twice as likely as men to earn baccalaureates in a health field, although persistence in health was low for both genders. We show that gender gaps in high school academic achievement, self-assessed math ability, and family-work orientation are only weakly associated with gender gaps in STEM completion and persistence. Gender differences in occupational plans, by contrast, are strongly associated with gender gaps in STEM outcomes, even in models that assume plans are endogenous to academic achievement, self-assessed math ability, and family-work orientation. These results can inform efforts to mitigate gender gaps in STEM attainment.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"297 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720928484","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

In the United States, women are more likely than men to enter and complete college, but they remain underrepresented among baccalaureates in science-related majors. We show that in a cohort of college entrants who graduated from high school in 2004, men were more than twice as likely as women to complete baccalaureate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, including premed fields, and more likely to persist in STEM/biomed after entering these majors by sophomore year. Conversely, women were more than twice as likely as men to earn baccalaureates in a health field, although persistence in health was low for both genders. We show that gender gaps in high school academic achievement, self-assessed math ability, and family-work orientation are only weakly associated with gender gaps in STEM completion and persistence. Gender differences in occupational plans, by contrast, are strongly associated with gender gaps in STEM outcomes, even in models that assume plans are endogenous to academic achievement, self-assessed math ability, and family-work orientation. These results can inform efforts to mitigate gender gaps in STEM attainment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管道梦想:STEM专业持续和完成的职业计划和性别差异
在美国,女性比男性更有可能进入大学并完成学业,但在科学相关专业的学士学位中,女性的比例仍然偏低。我们表明,在2004年高中毕业的大学新生中,男性完成科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域(包括医学预科领域)学士学位的可能性是女性的两倍多,并且在大二进入这些专业后更有可能坚持STEM/生物医学。相反,女性在卫生领域获得学士学位的可能性是男性的两倍多,尽管在卫生领域的持久性对两性来说都很低。我们发现,高中学业成绩、自我评估的数学能力和家庭工作取向方面的性别差距与STEM完成和坚持方面的性别差距只有微弱的关联。相比之下,职业计划中的性别差异与STEM结果中的性别差距密切相关,即使在假设职业计划与学业成就、自我评估的数学能力和家庭工作取向内生的模型中也是如此。这些结果可以为减轻STEM成就方面的性别差距提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Sociology of Education (SOE) provides a forum for studies in the sociology of education and human social development. SOE publishes research that examines how social institutions and individuals’ experiences within these institutions affect educational processes and social development. Such research may span various levels of analysis, ranging from the individual to the structure of relations among social and educational institutions. In an increasingly complex society, important educational issues arise throughout the life cycle.
期刊最新文献
Message from the Editors Curricular Differentiation and Informal Networks: How Formal Grouping and Ranking Practices Shape Friendships among Students in College Sent out, Kept In: Detainment-Based Discipline in a Public High School Month of Birth, Early Academic Achievement, and Parental Expectations of University Completion: A New Test on Sticky Expectations The Role of Schooling in Equalizing Achievement Disparity by Migrant Background
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1