Reimagining Family Engagement in Online Literacy Clinics During the Pandemic

R. Rogers, Cheryl L. Dozier, Theresa Deeney, Martille Elias, Shelly Huggins, Liliane Jorge, S. Msengi, A. Ferris, Agnes Chileshe Chibamba
{"title":"Reimagining Family Engagement in Online Literacy Clinics During the Pandemic","authors":"R. Rogers, Cheryl L. Dozier, Theresa Deeney, Martille Elias, Shelly Huggins, Liliane Jorge, S. Msengi, A. Ferris, Agnes Chileshe Chibamba","doi":"10.1177/23813377231183736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and continuing racial injustices, many literacy clinics pivoted to online instruction. Educators were now in students’ homes for virtual literacy lessons. To understand how literacy clinics responded, teacher educators analyzed a national survey of clinic directors’ perspectives. Analysis regarding family communication and participation led to six categories: parent involvement, communication, family presence, learning with families v. teaching families, diminished/enhanced experiences, and access/digital divide. Contrasting examples from these categories were chosen to create a research-based verbatim audio play. Teacher educators then used fieldnotes, artifacts, and transcripts from their clinical experiences to create vignettes of clinic instruction, which they then put into dialogue with survey findings to reconceptualize, animate, and (re)present these as navigating digital divides/access, challenging school-centric definitions of family literacy, and building community with families in online settings. Findings from this study highlight that as the technological landscape of literacy clinics changes, so must our understanding of engaging with families’ literacy practices.","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"218 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377231183736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and continuing racial injustices, many literacy clinics pivoted to online instruction. Educators were now in students’ homes for virtual literacy lessons. To understand how literacy clinics responded, teacher educators analyzed a national survey of clinic directors’ perspectives. Analysis regarding family communication and participation led to six categories: parent involvement, communication, family presence, learning with families v. teaching families, diminished/enhanced experiences, and access/digital divide. Contrasting examples from these categories were chosen to create a research-based verbatim audio play. Teacher educators then used fieldnotes, artifacts, and transcripts from their clinical experiences to create vignettes of clinic instruction, which they then put into dialogue with survey findings to reconceptualize, animate, and (re)present these as navigating digital divides/access, challenging school-centric definitions of family literacy, and building community with families in online settings. Findings from this study highlight that as the technological landscape of literacy clinics changes, so must our understanding of engaging with families’ literacy practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大流行期间重新构想在线扫盲诊所的家庭参与
在2019冠状病毒病的双重流行和持续的种族不公正期间,许多扫盲诊所转向在线教学。教育工作者现在在学生家里上虚拟识字课。为了了解扫盲诊所的反应,教师教育工作者分析了一项关于诊所主任观点的全国性调查。关于家庭沟通和参与的分析分为六个类别:父母参与、沟通、家庭在场、与家庭一起学习vs .教导家庭、减少/增强体验、访问/数字鸿沟。从这些类别中选择对比的例子来创建一个基于研究的逐字音频播放。然后,教师教育者使用实地记录、人工物品和临床经验的成绩单来创建临床教学的小片段,然后将这些小片段与调查结果进行对话,以重新概念化、动画化和(重新)呈现这些内容,以引导数字鸿沟/访问,挑战以学校为中心的家庭扫盲定义,并在在线环境中与家庭建立社区。这项研究的结果强调,随着扫盲诊所的技术环境发生变化,我们对参与家庭扫盲实践的理解也必须改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1