{"title":"Contemplation and “Non-doing” in the Christian Tradition: The Case of John of Ruusbroec","authors":"R. Faesen","doi":"10.46586/er.14.2023.10222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recurrent theme in many forms of contemplative practice is the need to come to a state of outward solitude (i.e., being without distractions); this provides a framework for contemplation, which ultimately can give way to a suspension of all efforts, opening up a state of inner letting-be. This contribution explores these elements in the Christian tradition following the Biblical typology of Martha and Mary (Lk 10:38–42) with some leading authors (Clement of Alexandria, Ambrose of Milan, Augustine of Hippo, John Cassian and Gregory the Great). A specific aspect of the Christian interpretation is that the state of ‘non-doing’ is essentially relational. This relational dimension, in which contemplation and the state of ‘letting-be’ are understood as a response to the initiative of the divine Other who is ‘the origin’ (Lat. principium), provides John of Ruusbroec with the basis to explain how action and non-doing (i.e., contemplation) can coalesce perfectly.","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.14.2023.10222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A recurrent theme in many forms of contemplative practice is the need to come to a state of outward solitude (i.e., being without distractions); this provides a framework for contemplation, which ultimately can give way to a suspension of all efforts, opening up a state of inner letting-be. This contribution explores these elements in the Christian tradition following the Biblical typology of Martha and Mary (Lk 10:38–42) with some leading authors (Clement of Alexandria, Ambrose of Milan, Augustine of Hippo, John Cassian and Gregory the Great). A specific aspect of the Christian interpretation is that the state of ‘non-doing’ is essentially relational. This relational dimension, in which contemplation and the state of ‘letting-be’ are understood as a response to the initiative of the divine Other who is ‘the origin’ (Lat. principium), provides John of Ruusbroec with the basis to explain how action and non-doing (i.e., contemplation) can coalesce perfectly.
在许多形式的冥想练习中,一个反复出现的主题是需要达到一种外在孤独的状态(即,没有分心);这为沉思提供了一个框架,最终可以让位于暂停所有的努力,打开一种内在的放任状态。这篇文章探讨了基督教传统中的这些元素,遵循圣经中马大和玛利亚的预表(路10:38-42),一些主要作者(亚历山大的克莱门特,米兰的安布罗斯,希波的奥古斯丁,约翰卡西安和格里高利大帝)。基督教解释的一个具体方面是,“无为”的状态本质上是关系的。在这种关系维度中,沉思和“放任”的状态被理解为对“起源”的神圣他者的主动回应。原理),为Ruusbroec的约翰(John of Ruusbroec)提供了解释行动与不作为(即沉思)如何完美结合的基础。