Contemplation and “Non-doing” in the Christian Tradition: The Case of John of Ruusbroec

Q1 Arts and Humanities Entangled Religions Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.46586/er.14.2023.10222
R. Faesen
{"title":"Contemplation and “Non-doing” in the Christian Tradition: The Case of John of Ruusbroec","authors":"R. Faesen","doi":"10.46586/er.14.2023.10222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recurrent theme in many forms of contemplative practice is the need to come to a state of outward solitude (i.e., being without distractions); this provides a framework for contemplation, which ultimately can give way to a suspension of all efforts, opening up a state of inner letting-be. This contribution explores these elements in the Christian tradition following the Biblical typology of Martha and Mary (Lk 10:38–42) with some leading authors (Clement of Alexandria, Ambrose of Milan, Augustine of Hippo, John Cassian and Gregory the Great). A specific aspect of the Christian interpretation is that the state of ‘non-doing’ is essentially relational. This relational dimension, in which contemplation and the state of ‘letting-be’ are understood as a response to the initiative of the divine Other who is ‘the origin’ (Lat. principium), provides John of Ruusbroec with the basis to explain how action and non-doing (i.e., contemplation) can coalesce perfectly.","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.14.2023.10222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recurrent theme in many forms of contemplative practice is the need to come to a state of outward solitude (i.e., being without distractions); this provides a framework for contemplation, which ultimately can give way to a suspension of all efforts, opening up a state of inner letting-be. This contribution explores these elements in the Christian tradition following the Biblical typology of Martha and Mary (Lk 10:38–42) with some leading authors (Clement of Alexandria, Ambrose of Milan, Augustine of Hippo, John Cassian and Gregory the Great). A specific aspect of the Christian interpretation is that the state of ‘non-doing’ is essentially relational. This relational dimension, in which contemplation and the state of ‘letting-be’ are understood as a response to the initiative of the divine Other who is ‘the origin’ (Lat. principium), provides John of Ruusbroec with the basis to explain how action and non-doing (i.e., contemplation) can coalesce perfectly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基督教传统中的沉思与“无为”:以鲁斯布鲁克的约翰为例
在许多形式的冥想练习中,一个反复出现的主题是需要达到一种外在孤独的状态(即,没有分心);这为沉思提供了一个框架,最终可以让位于暂停所有的努力,打开一种内在的放任状态。这篇文章探讨了基督教传统中的这些元素,遵循圣经中马大和玛利亚的预表(路10:38-42),一些主要作者(亚历山大的克莱门特,米兰的安布罗斯,希波的奥古斯丁,约翰卡西安和格里高利大帝)。基督教解释的一个具体方面是,“无为”的状态本质上是关系的。在这种关系维度中,沉思和“放任”的状态被理解为对“起源”的神圣他者的主动回应。原理),为Ruusbroec的约翰(John of Ruusbroec)提供了解释行动与不作为(即沉思)如何完美结合的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Entangled Religions
Entangled Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cursing Beyond the Grave: Imprecations and Jewish Funerary Culture in Antiquity Deconverted Hearts in a Deconverted Church Conversions to Shiʿism in Italy and Editorial Ventures Intuition, Rebellion and Tradition Reversion, Revival, Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1