Lessons learned from England's national electronic health record implementation: implications for the international community

K. Cresswell, A. Robertson, A. Sheikh
{"title":"Lessons learned from England's national electronic health record implementation: implications for the international community","authors":"K. Cresswell, A. Robertson, A. Sheikh","doi":"10.1145/2110363.2110441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: National electronic health record (EHR) programs are increasingly being pursued across the world with the aim of improving the safety, quality and efficiency of healthcare. Despite significant international investments, and particularly in the light of reported \"failures\", there is surprisingly little evidence on the specific and potentially transferable factors associated with the planning and execution of large-scale EHR implementations. England embarked on a National Program in 2002, characterized by \"top-down\", central procurement of a few, standardized EHR systems. Objectives: To evaluate the national implementation and adoption of EHRs in English hospitals and derive lessons for this and other national EHR programs. Design: We conducted a qualitative case study-based longitudinal evaluation drawing on sociotechnical principles. Setting: Data were collected from 12 \"early adopter\" hospitals across England. Data sources: Our dataset consisted of 431 semi-structured interviews; 590 hours of observations; 334 sets of notes from observations, researcher field notes and notes from conferences; 809 hospital documents; and 58 national and regional documents. Results: A range of factors emerged as important. These included software characteristics and user involvement in shaping technology; realistic timelines, balancing the national EHR vision and stakeholder expectations; relationship building and communication; balancing national progress with allowing local accommodation; and maintaining central direction whilst permitting degrees of local autonomy. Conclusions: It is not possible to be prescriptive for achieving \"successful\" national EHR implementations. Nonetheless, we identify dimensions likely to be of greater significance than others, in a range of national contexts. We argue that design, based on users' requirements, and accommodation of the technology in the healthcare setting need to occur on a small-scale first before building out to satisfy organizational, local health economy and national needs, and that this needs time. Our results will we hope offer evidence to inform national strategies for large-scale and expensive EHR ventures.","PeriodicalId":90523,"journal":{"name":"IHI ... : proceedings of the ... ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium","volume":"38 1","pages":"685-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IHI ... : proceedings of the ... ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: National electronic health record (EHR) programs are increasingly being pursued across the world with the aim of improving the safety, quality and efficiency of healthcare. Despite significant international investments, and particularly in the light of reported "failures", there is surprisingly little evidence on the specific and potentially transferable factors associated with the planning and execution of large-scale EHR implementations. England embarked on a National Program in 2002, characterized by "top-down", central procurement of a few, standardized EHR systems. Objectives: To evaluate the national implementation and adoption of EHRs in English hospitals and derive lessons for this and other national EHR programs. Design: We conducted a qualitative case study-based longitudinal evaluation drawing on sociotechnical principles. Setting: Data were collected from 12 "early adopter" hospitals across England. Data sources: Our dataset consisted of 431 semi-structured interviews; 590 hours of observations; 334 sets of notes from observations, researcher field notes and notes from conferences; 809 hospital documents; and 58 national and regional documents. Results: A range of factors emerged as important. These included software characteristics and user involvement in shaping technology; realistic timelines, balancing the national EHR vision and stakeholder expectations; relationship building and communication; balancing national progress with allowing local accommodation; and maintaining central direction whilst permitting degrees of local autonomy. Conclusions: It is not possible to be prescriptive for achieving "successful" national EHR implementations. Nonetheless, we identify dimensions likely to be of greater significance than others, in a range of national contexts. We argue that design, based on users' requirements, and accommodation of the technology in the healthcare setting need to occur on a small-scale first before building out to satisfy organizational, local health economy and national needs, and that this needs time. Our results will we hope offer evidence to inform national strategies for large-scale and expensive EHR ventures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国国家电子健康记录实施的经验教训:对国际社会的影响
背景:为了提高医疗保健的安全性、质量和效率,国家电子健康记录(EHR)计划在世界范围内越来越受到追捧。尽管有大量的国际投资,特别是鉴于报告的“失败”,但令人惊讶的是,很少有证据表明与大规模电子病历实施的规划和执行相关的具体和潜在可转移因素。2002年,英国启动了一项国家计划,其特点是“自上而下”,集中采购一些标准化的电子病历系统。目的:评估英国医院电子病历的实施和采用情况,为英国医院电子病历的实施和采用提供借鉴。设计:我们根据社会技术原理进行了基于定性案例研究的纵向评估。环境:数据收集自英格兰12家“早期采用者”医院。数据来源:我们的数据集由431个半结构化访谈组成;590小时观察;334套观察笔记、研究人员实地笔记和会议笔记;809份医院文件;58个国家和地区文件。结果:一系列的因素被认为是重要的。这些包括软件特性和用户参与塑造技术;现实的时间表,平衡国家电子病历愿景和利益相关者的期望;关系建立和沟通;平衡国家进步与允许地方住宿;保持中央领导,同时允许地方自治。结论:实现“成功”的国家电子病历实施是不可能的。尽管如此,在一系列国家背景下,我们确定的维度可能比其他维度更重要。我们认为,在满足组织、地方卫生经济和国家需求之前,基于用户需求的设计和医疗保健环境中的技术适应需要首先在小规模上进行,这需要时间。我们希望我们的结果将为大规模和昂贵的电子病历企业的国家战略提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating barriers to electronic medical record use during collaborative information seeking activities A corpus of clinical narratives annotated with temporal information Public health community mining in YouTube Lessons learned from England's national electronic health record implementation: implications for the international community Towards data: a human/machine-oriented approach of medical data collection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1