A simplified approach for preliminary design and process performance modeling of soil vapor extraction systems

J. Staudinger, P. Roberts, James D. Hartley
{"title":"A simplified approach for preliminary design and process performance modeling of soil vapor extraction systems","authors":"J. Staudinger, P. Roberts, James D. Hartley","doi":"10.1002/EP.3300160319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While soil vapor extraction has been widely utilized as a remedial action technology over the past decade, design and associated process performance modeling of full-scale systems continues to be frequently based on the results of pilot-scale treatability tests. To aid engineers in conducting preliminary scoping studies without the benefit of such treatability data, a relatively simple approach, consisting of linked design and process performance elements, was developed and subsequently incorporated into a spreadsheet format for rapid project evaluation purposes. Under this approach, a preliminary design is specified via a set of baseline values which vary based on the predominant soil type encountered at a particular site. Process performance is then mathematically modeled by a semi-empirical relation accounting for non-equilibrium (mass transfer) effects via use of a lumped parameter, the venting efficiency factor (η). Values for η vary based on characterization of soil heterogeneity. The low values cited for η (on the order of 0.02–0.20) reflect the relative inefficiency of field venting operations (due to inherent mass transfer limitations) when compared to idealized conditions. Validation results, considering two case studies reported in the literature, indicate that the approach developed provides reasonably accurate predictions. Evaluation of a hypothetical case study reveals that the number of extraction vents required as well as the number of pore volumes of soil vapor that must be extracted for effective remediation can vary by an order of magnitude depending upon the particular soil matrix encountered.","PeriodicalId":11769,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.3300160319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

While soil vapor extraction has been widely utilized as a remedial action technology over the past decade, design and associated process performance modeling of full-scale systems continues to be frequently based on the results of pilot-scale treatability tests. To aid engineers in conducting preliminary scoping studies without the benefit of such treatability data, a relatively simple approach, consisting of linked design and process performance elements, was developed and subsequently incorporated into a spreadsheet format for rapid project evaluation purposes. Under this approach, a preliminary design is specified via a set of baseline values which vary based on the predominant soil type encountered at a particular site. Process performance is then mathematically modeled by a semi-empirical relation accounting for non-equilibrium (mass transfer) effects via use of a lumped parameter, the venting efficiency factor (η). Values for η vary based on characterization of soil heterogeneity. The low values cited for η (on the order of 0.02–0.20) reflect the relative inefficiency of field venting operations (due to inherent mass transfer limitations) when compared to idealized conditions. Validation results, considering two case studies reported in the literature, indicate that the approach developed provides reasonably accurate predictions. Evaluation of a hypothetical case study reveals that the number of extraction vents required as well as the number of pore volumes of soil vapor that must be extracted for effective remediation can vary by an order of magnitude depending upon the particular soil matrix encountered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤蒸汽提取系统初步设计与过程性能建模的简化方法
虽然在过去十年中,土壤蒸汽提取已被广泛用作一种补救行动技术,但全尺寸系统的设计和相关过程性能建模仍然经常基于中试规模可处理性测试的结果。为了帮助工程师在没有这些可处理性数据的情况下进行初步的范围界定研究,开发了一种相对简单的方法,由连接的设计和过程性能元素组成,随后将其纳入电子表格格式,用于快速项目评估目的。在这种方法下,通过一组基线值来指定初步设计,这些基线值根据在特定地点遇到的主要土壤类型而变化。然后,通过使用集总参数,即排气效率因子(η),通过计算非平衡(传质)效应的半经验关系,对过程性能进行数学建模。η值根据土壤异质性的特征而变化。引用的η值较低(在0.02-0.20量级)反映了与理想条件相比,现场排气作业相对低效(由于固有的传质限制)。考虑到文献中报道的两个案例研究,验证结果表明,所开发的方法提供了相当准确的预测。对一个假设案例研究的评估表明,根据所遇到的特定土壤基质,所需的提取孔的数量以及必须提取有效修复的土壤蒸气的孔隙体积的数量可以变化一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of Python to Evaluate the Performance of Bagging Methods: Applications of Python to Evaluate the Performance of Bagging Methods Renewable Energy Resources, 3rd Edition Heterogeneous photocatalytic decolorization and degradation of structurally related textile reactive dyes in aqueous suspension of ZnO nanotube Ultrasonic treatment of waste activated sludge Improved methods for carbon adsorption studies for water and wastewater treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1