The Comparative Study of Azilsartan with Telmisartan in Terms of Efficacy, Safety and Cost - Effectiveness in Hypertension

Ena Bhajni, V. Sehgal, Ashish Kumar, A. Sehgal
{"title":"The Comparative Study of Azilsartan with Telmisartan in Terms of Efficacy, Safety and Cost - Effectiveness in Hypertension","authors":"Ena Bhajni, V. Sehgal, Ashish Kumar, A. Sehgal","doi":"10.18311/ijmds/2020/24723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hypertension (HT) represents the most common cardiovascular risk factor amongst the cluster group of Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD). Clinically, HT might be defined as that level of Blood Pressure (BP) at which the institution of therapy reduces the BP-related morbidity and mortality. Azilsartan (AZL) is a relatively new Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) available for the treatment of any stage of HT. Aim: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of AZL 40-80 mg once daily versus telmisartan 40-80 mg once daily in patients of stage-I HT. Methods: A prospective, open, randomized parallel group comparative study of AZL versus telmisartan was done in patients of stage-I HT. The study included 80 patients, 40 in each group (group I and group II) coming to the department of Medicine, Rajindra Hospital attached to Government Medical College, Patiala. The study was conducted over 8 weeks. Group I, patients received Azilsartan 40-80 mg per day in divided doses and group II, patients received telmisartan 40-80 mg per day in divided doses according to severity of hypertension. The therapeutic efficacy of drugs was evaluated by monitoring BP. Adverse drug reactions were monitored in patients. The daily cost for each medication was noted and total cost of drugs taken over 8 weeks was calculated. Effectiveness of the drugs was calculated in terms of mm Hg fall in mean BP. All the observations thus made were statistically analyzed using appropriate tests. Results: Patients receiving AZL 40mg and telmisartan 40mg showed a significant fall (p<0.05) in systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, when compared to baseline. The difference in SBP and DBP between Group I (AZL) and II (Telmisartan) was statistically significant at 4 weeks (p<0.05) and was highly significant at 8 weeks (p<0.001). Adverse effects such as nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis, headache, dizziness, and fatigue were reported with both drugs. Conclusions: Reduction of BP with AZL was more as compared to telmisartan at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Safety and tolerability was similar in both groups.","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds/2020/24723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension (HT) represents the most common cardiovascular risk factor amongst the cluster group of Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD). Clinically, HT might be defined as that level of Blood Pressure (BP) at which the institution of therapy reduces the BP-related morbidity and mortality. Azilsartan (AZL) is a relatively new Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) available for the treatment of any stage of HT. Aim: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of AZL 40-80 mg once daily versus telmisartan 40-80 mg once daily in patients of stage-I HT. Methods: A prospective, open, randomized parallel group comparative study of AZL versus telmisartan was done in patients of stage-I HT. The study included 80 patients, 40 in each group (group I and group II) coming to the department of Medicine, Rajindra Hospital attached to Government Medical College, Patiala. The study was conducted over 8 weeks. Group I, patients received Azilsartan 40-80 mg per day in divided doses and group II, patients received telmisartan 40-80 mg per day in divided doses according to severity of hypertension. The therapeutic efficacy of drugs was evaluated by monitoring BP. Adverse drug reactions were monitored in patients. The daily cost for each medication was noted and total cost of drugs taken over 8 weeks was calculated. Effectiveness of the drugs was calculated in terms of mm Hg fall in mean BP. All the observations thus made were statistically analyzed using appropriate tests. Results: Patients receiving AZL 40mg and telmisartan 40mg showed a significant fall (p<0.05) in systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, when compared to baseline. The difference in SBP and DBP between Group I (AZL) and II (Telmisartan) was statistically significant at 4 weeks (p<0.05) and was highly significant at 8 weeks (p<0.001). Adverse effects such as nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis, headache, dizziness, and fatigue were reported with both drugs. Conclusions: Reduction of BP with AZL was more as compared to telmisartan at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Safety and tolerability was similar in both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿兹沙坦与替米沙坦治疗高血压的疗效、安全性和成本效益比较研究
高血压(HT)是心血管疾病(CVD)群中最常见的心血管危险因素。在临床上,高血压可被定义为血压(BP)水平,在该水平上,治疗机构可降低与BP相关的发病率和死亡率。阿兹沙坦(Azilsartan, AZL)是一种相对较新的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),可用于治疗任何阶段的HT。目的:比较AZL 40- 80mg /天1次与替米沙坦40- 80mg /天1次在i期HT患者中的疗效、安全性和成本效益。方法:在i期HT患者中进行AZL与替米沙坦的前瞻性、开放、随机平行组比较研究。该研究包括80名患者,每组40名(第一组和第二组)来到帕蒂亚拉政府医学院附属Rajindra医院医学系。这项研究进行了8周。I组患者接受阿兹沙坦40 ~ 80mg /天分剂量治疗,II组患者接受替米沙坦40 ~ 80mg /天根据高血压严重程度分剂量治疗。通过监测血压来评价药物的疗效。监测患者的药物不良反应。记录每日每种药物的费用,并计算8周内服用药物的总费用。药物的有效性是根据平均血压的毫米汞柱下降计算的。通过适当的检验对所有观察结果进行统计分析。结果:与基线相比,服用AZL 40mg和替米沙坦40mg的患者在4周和8周时收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)显著下降(p<0.05)。I组(AZL)与II组(替米沙坦)在4周时收缩压、舒张压差异有统计学意义(p<0.05), 8周时差异极显著(p<0.001)。两种药物均有鼻咽炎、上呼吸道感染、胃肠炎、头痛、头晕和疲劳等不良反应的报道。结论:与替米沙坦相比,AZL在4周和8周时降低血压的效果更好。两组的安全性和耐受性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topical Application of Citrus limon Peel Essential Oil Increased Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Expression on Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction Role of Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry The Wider Meaning of Addiction Antibacterial Power of Nano Brown Anchovy (Stolephorus insularis) Against Mixed Bacteria in Deep Dentin Caries Scientific Integrity-Overcoming Challenges in Medical Research and Publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1