SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDERS

Barbora Cervenková, Gabriela Solná
{"title":"SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDERS","authors":"Barbora Cervenková, Gabriela Solná","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Language comprehension is vital to social and educational development. Difficulties in sentence comprehension can be detected in most children with developmental language disorders (DLD) using age-appropriate instruments with high sensitivity. There are two main theoretical frameworks for the characterization of difficulties in language acquisition in children with (DLD): linguistic-based and cognitive-based theories. The aim of this study is a comparison of language comprehension in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and children with typical language development (TLD). Two types of tests referred to as main theoretical frameworks have been used (Token test and TEPO - Sentence Comprehension Test). Sample: We studied 101 children aged 4,3-6,9 years with (DLD) and typically developing peers (TLD). Data collection took place in the period 2021-2023. Method: It is quantitative research. A total of 47 children with (DLD) were compared with 54 children with (TLD) in two comprehension tests. The research goals were set as follows: 1) Correlation of TEPO test and Token test using Spearman´s correlation coefficient; 2) Comparison of homogeneity of test results in TLD and DLD children using Stuart–Maxwell test; 3) Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of both tests. Results: There is a high dependence between the two tests, indicating a high level of correlation, with = 0.81 in the whole research sample. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the test results based on percentile rank scores. The non-parametric unpaired Stuart-Maxwell test was used. The TEPO test has high sensitivity (95,7%) and the Token test has high specificity (90,7%). Discussion: Both comprehension tests have several advantages in terms of their characteristics, and they also have some limitations. The research results provide more information about the differences between the two testing methods and explain how the test results can be used in education.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Language comprehension is vital to social and educational development. Difficulties in sentence comprehension can be detected in most children with developmental language disorders (DLD) using age-appropriate instruments with high sensitivity. There are two main theoretical frameworks for the characterization of difficulties in language acquisition in children with (DLD): linguistic-based and cognitive-based theories. The aim of this study is a comparison of language comprehension in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and children with typical language development (TLD). Two types of tests referred to as main theoretical frameworks have been used (Token test and TEPO - Sentence Comprehension Test). Sample: We studied 101 children aged 4,3-6,9 years with (DLD) and typically developing peers (TLD). Data collection took place in the period 2021-2023. Method: It is quantitative research. A total of 47 children with (DLD) were compared with 54 children with (TLD) in two comprehension tests. The research goals were set as follows: 1) Correlation of TEPO test and Token test using Spearman´s correlation coefficient; 2) Comparison of homogeneity of test results in TLD and DLD children using Stuart–Maxwell test; 3) Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of both tests. Results: There is a high dependence between the two tests, indicating a high level of correlation, with = 0.81 in the whole research sample. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the test results based on percentile rank scores. The non-parametric unpaired Stuart-Maxwell test was used. The TEPO test has high sensitivity (95,7%) and the Token test has high specificity (90,7%). Discussion: Both comprehension tests have several advantages in terms of their characteristics, and they also have some limitations. The research results provide more information about the differences between the two testing methods and explain how the test results can be used in education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展性语言障碍儿童的句子理解能力
目的:语言理解对社会和教育的发展至关重要。大多数发展性语言障碍儿童的句子理解困难可以使用适合年龄的高灵敏度仪器来检测。有两个主要的理论框架来描述语言障碍儿童的语言习得困难:基于语言的理论和基于认知的理论。本研究的目的是比较发展性语言障碍儿童和典型语言发展性儿童的语言理解能力。两种类型的测试被称为主要的理论框架(标记测试和TEPO -句子理解测试)。样本:我们研究了101名年龄分别为4岁、3-6岁和9岁的儿童(DLD)和典型发育同伴(TLD)。数据收集在2021-2023年期间进行。方法:定量研究。在两项理解测试中,将47例(DLD)儿童与54例(TLD)儿童进行比较。研究目标如下:1)利用Spearman相关系数对TEPO检验与Token检验进行相关性分析;2)采用Stuart-Maxwell检验比较TLD与DLD患儿检验结果的同质性;3)测定两种试验的敏感性和特异性。结果:两项检验之间存在较高的依赖性,相关性较高,整个研究样本的相关性为= 0.81。基于百分位秩分数的检验结果之间有统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。采用非参数未配对Stuart-Maxwell检验。TEPO试验灵敏度高(95.7%),Token试验特异性高(90.9%)。讨论:两种理解测试就其特点而言都有一些优点,但它们也有一些局限性。研究结果提供了更多关于两种测试方法之间差异的信息,并解释了如何将测试结果用于教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEASURING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN STUDENTS WITH/WITHOUT CARE-RESPONSIBILITIES TO PUSH GENDER EQUITY DESIGN OF POWER ELECTRONIC SYSTEM WITH VARIABLE TOPOLOGY OF THE MAIN CIRCUIT FOR EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT OF LABORATORY EXERCISES OF POWER SEMICONDUCTOR CONVERTERS IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENHANCING STUDENT PREPAREDNESS FOR CLINICAL EXAMS CRITICAL REFLEXIVITY AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN EDUCATION AND BEYOND CHALLENGES – TOWARDS CONTINUOUS PEER ASSESSMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMING CLASSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1