A response to the European Data Protection Supervisor ‘Misunderstandings in Biometrics’ by the European Association for Biometrics

IF 1.8 4区计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IET Biometrics Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI:10.1049/bme2.12057

Christoph Busch, Adam Czajka, Farzin Deravi, Pawel Drozdowski, Marta Gomez-Barrero, Georg Hasse, Olaf Henniger, Els Kindt, Jascha Kolberg, Alexander Nouak, Kiran Raja, Raghavendra Ramachandra, Christian Rathgeb, Jean Salomon, Raymond Veldhuis

{"title":"A response to the European Data Protection Supervisor ‘Misunderstandings in Biometrics’ by the European Association for Biometrics","authors":"Christoph Busch, Adam Czajka, Farzin Deravi, Pawel Drozdowski, Marta Gomez-Barrero, Georg Hasse, Olaf Henniger, Els Kindt, Jascha Kolberg, Alexander Nouak, Kiran Raja, Raghavendra Ramachandra, Christian Rathgeb, Jean Salomon, Raymond Veldhuis","doi":"10.1049/bme2.12057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The intention of this position paper is to comment on the joint European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)-Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (aepd) publication ‘14 Misunderstandings with regard to Biometric Identification and Authentication’ that was published in June 2020 and to provide additional input to help with the better understanding of the issues raised in that publication. In particular, it aims to highlight some important missing information in the aforementioned publication. It is hoped that this paper will help with any future revision of the EDPS-aepd publication, such that it includes a full picture of the current state of the art in biometrics and the availability of standards and privacy enhancing techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":48821,"journal":{"name":"IET Biometrics","volume":"11 1","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2.12057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2.12057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intention of this position paper is to comment on the joint European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)-Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (aepd) publication ‘14 Misunderstandings with regard to Biometric Identification and Authentication’ that was published in June 2020 and to provide additional input to help with the better understanding of the issues raised in that publication. In particular, it aims to highlight some important missing information in the aforementioned publication. It is hoped that this paper will help with any future revision of the EDPS-aepd publication, such that it includes a full picture of the current state of the art in biometrics and the availability of standards and privacy enhancing techniques.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

欧洲生物识别协会对欧洲数据保护监管机构“生物识别技术中的误解”的回应

本立场文件的目的是对2020年6月发布的欧洲数据保护监管机构(EDPS)-机构Española de Protección de Datos (aepd)联合出版物“关于生物识别和认证的14个误解”发表评论，并提供额外的投入，以帮助更好地理解该出版物中提出的问题。特别地，它旨在强调上述出版物中一些重要的缺失信息。我们希望这篇论文能对EDPS-aepd出版物的未来修订有所帮助，使其全面介绍生物识别技术的现状、标准的可用性和增强隐私的技术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

IET Biometrics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

33 weeks

期刊介绍： The field of biometric recognition - automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioural and biological characteristics - has now reached a level of maturity where viable practical applications are both possible and increasingly available. The biometrics field is characterised especially by its interdisciplinarity since, while focused primarily around a strong technological base, effective system design and implementation often requires a broad range of skills encompassing, for example, human factors, data security and database technologies, psychological and physiological awareness, and so on. Also, the technology focus itself embraces diversity, since the engineering of effective biometric systems requires integration of image analysis, pattern recognition, sensor technology, database engineering, security design and many other strands of understanding. The scope of the journal is intentionally relatively wide. While focusing on core technological issues, it is recognised that these may be inherently diverse and in many cases may cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The scope of the journal will therefore include any topics where it can be shown that a paper can increase our understanding of biometric systems, signal future developments and applications for biometrics, or promote greater practical uptake for relevant technologies: Development and enhancement of individual biometric modalities including the established and traditional modalities (e.g. face, fingerprint, iris, signature and handwriting recognition) and also newer or emerging modalities (gait, ear-shape, neurological patterns, etc.) Multibiometrics, theoretical and practical issues, implementation of practical systems, multiclassifier and multimodal approaches Soft biometrics and information fusion for identification, verification and trait prediction Human factors and the human-computer interface issues for biometric systems, exception handling strategies Template construction and template management, ageing factors and their impact on biometric systems Usability and user-oriented design, psychological and physiological principles and system integration Sensors and sensor technologies for biometric processing Database technologies to support biometric systems Implementation of biometric systems, security engineering implications, smartcard and associated technologies in implementation, implementation platforms, system design and performance evaluation Trust and privacy issues, security of biometric systems and supporting technological solutions, biometric template protection Biometric cryptosystems, security and biometrics-linked encryption Links with forensic processing and cross-disciplinary commonalities Core underpinning technologies (e.g. image analysis, pattern recognition, computer vision, signal processing, etc.), where the specific relevance to biometric processing can be demonstrated Applications and application-led considerations Position papers on technology or on the industrial context of biometric system development Adoption and promotion of standards in biometrics, improving technology acceptance, deployment and interoperability, avoiding cross-cultural and cross-sector restrictions Relevant ethical and social issues