Homoeopathic Perspective in the Management of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review

U. Singh, Shweta Singh, H. Ram
{"title":"Homoeopathic Perspective in the Management of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review","authors":"U. Singh, Shweta Singh, H. Ram","doi":"10.9734/jocamr/2023/v22i4465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Substance abuse has become a widespread global issue. It includes abuse of illegal substances, namely marijuana, heroin, cocaine and methamphetamines, and legal substances, including alcohol, nicotine or prescribed medicines. \nAim of Review: This review assesses the role of Homoeopathy in the therapeutic management of substance use disorders (SUD) through a systematic web-based literature search. \nMethods: A comprehensive search was conducted online and manually to identify homoeopathic research studies published between 1993 and 2022 on SUD in international databases and the Central Council of Research in Homoeopathy library. Relevant studies were categorised and assessed in terms of study designs, number of participants, evidence grades and clinical outcome parameters. A total of 21 full-text studies were screened and evaluated. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed for all studies and model validity was appraised for the included RCTs'. \nResults: 10 studies (3 Randomised Controlled Trials, 3 Observational studies, 1 Pilot study, 1 observational comparative study, 1 Retrospective cohort study and 1 case series) were included and 11 studies were excluded with reasons. 03 studies have a level of evidence of 1b with an 'A' grade of recommendation, which consists of the RCTs only. The most commonly prescribed medicines identified were: Arsenic album, Nux vomica, Lycopodium, Pulsatilla, Sulphur, Staphysagria, Belladonna, Ipecac, Chamomilla, Rhustox, Phosphorus and Lachesis. \nA high risk of bias was elicited in most of the observational studies accentuating the need for more robust methodological studies. \nConclusion:  The majority of the studies have a small number of recruitments. Pragmatic studies with larger sample sizes and validated outcome measures may be designed further to validate the promising role of homoeopathic medicines in SUDs and generate quality evidence.","PeriodicalId":15398,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jocamr/2023/v22i4465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance abuse has become a widespread global issue. It includes abuse of illegal substances, namely marijuana, heroin, cocaine and methamphetamines, and legal substances, including alcohol, nicotine or prescribed medicines. Aim of Review: This review assesses the role of Homoeopathy in the therapeutic management of substance use disorders (SUD) through a systematic web-based literature search. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted online and manually to identify homoeopathic research studies published between 1993 and 2022 on SUD in international databases and the Central Council of Research in Homoeopathy library. Relevant studies were categorised and assessed in terms of study designs, number of participants, evidence grades and clinical outcome parameters. A total of 21 full-text studies were screened and evaluated. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed for all studies and model validity was appraised for the included RCTs'. Results: 10 studies (3 Randomised Controlled Trials, 3 Observational studies, 1 Pilot study, 1 observational comparative study, 1 Retrospective cohort study and 1 case series) were included and 11 studies were excluded with reasons. 03 studies have a level of evidence of 1b with an 'A' grade of recommendation, which consists of the RCTs only. The most commonly prescribed medicines identified were: Arsenic album, Nux vomica, Lycopodium, Pulsatilla, Sulphur, Staphysagria, Belladonna, Ipecac, Chamomilla, Rhustox, Phosphorus and Lachesis. A high risk of bias was elicited in most of the observational studies accentuating the need for more robust methodological studies. Conclusion:  The majority of the studies have a small number of recruitments. Pragmatic studies with larger sample sizes and validated outcome measures may be designed further to validate the promising role of homoeopathic medicines in SUDs and generate quality evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺势疗法在药物使用障碍管理中的应用:系统综述
背景:药物滥用已成为一个普遍的全球性问题。它包括滥用非法物质,即大麻、海洛因、可卡因和甲基苯丙胺,以及合法物质,包括酒精、尼古丁或处方药。综述目的:本综述通过系统的网络文献检索,评估顺势疗法在药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗管理中的作用。方法:对国际数据库和顺势疗法研究中央委员会图书馆1993 - 2022年发表的顺势疗法研究进行在线和人工综合检索。根据研究设计、参与者数量、证据等级和临床结果参数对相关研究进行分类和评估。共筛选和评估了21项全文研究。对所有研究进行偏倚风险(RoB)评估,并对纳入的rct进行模型效度评估。结果:纳入10项研究(3项随机对照试验、3项观察性研究、1项先导研究、1项观察性比较研究、1项回顾性队列研究和1项病例系列研究),有原因排除11项研究。03项研究的证据水平为1b,推荐等级为“a”,仅由随机对照试验组成。鉴定出的最常见处方药为:砒霜、马钱子、石蒜、白头翁、硫、葡萄球菌、颠茄、吐根、洋甘菊、猪蹄草、磷和乳香。在大多数观察性研究中引起了高偏倚风险,这突出了对更可靠的方法学研究的需要。结论:大多数研究都有少量的招募。可以进一步设计具有更大样本量和验证结果测量的实用研究,以验证顺势疗法药物在sud中的有希望的作用,并产生高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sub-chronic Hepatotoxicity Assessment of Ghana Cleanser® in Exposed Wistar Rats Profile of Primary Headache Patients at Tanjung Priok Health Center for the Period of January – December 2023 Exploring the Pharmacognostic Characteristics, Antioxidant Potential, and Anticholinesterase Activity of Piliostigma thonningii (Schum.) Milne-Redh.: Implications for Neuroprotection and Cognitive Health Acupuncture Readiness Attitude Scale (ARAS): An Informal Screener for Patient Suitability for Acupuncture Treatment A Descriptive Study on Stunting in Toddlers & Contributing Factors in Cibungur Village, Sumedang District, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1