Timing and mechanisms of Tibetan Plateau uplift

Lin Ding, Paul Kapp, Fulong Cai, Carmala N. Garzione, Zhongyu Xiong, Houqi Wang, Chao Wang
{"title":"Timing and mechanisms of Tibetan Plateau uplift","authors":"Lin Ding, Paul Kapp, Fulong Cai, Carmala N. Garzione, Zhongyu Xiong, Houqi Wang, Chao Wang","doi":"10.1038/s43017-022-00318-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The timing of the initial India–Asia collision and the mechanisms that led to the eventual formation of the high (>5 km) Tibetan Plateau remain enigmatic. In this Review, we describe the spatio-temporal distribution and geodynamic mechanisms of surface uplift in the Tibetan Plateau, based on geologic and palaeo-altimetric constraints. Localized mountain building was initiated during a Cretaceous microcontinent collision event in central Tibet and ocean–continent convergence in southern Tibet. Geological data indicate that India began colliding with Asian-affinity rocks 65–60 million years ago (Ma). High-elevation (>4 km) east–west mountain belts were established in southern and central Tibet by ~55 Ma and ~45 Ma, respectively. These mountain belts were separated by ≤2 km elevation basins centred on the microcontinent suture in central Tibet, until the basins were uplifted further between ~38 and 29 Ma. Basin uplift to ≥4 km elevation was delayed along the India–Asia suture zone until ~20 Ma, along with that in northern Tibet. Delamination and break-off of the subducted Indian and Asian lithosphere were the dominant mechanisms of surface uplift, with spatial variations controlled by inherited lithospheric heterogeneities. Future research should explore why surface uplift along suture zones — the loci of the initial collision — was substantially delayed compared with the time of initial collision. The geodynamic mechanisms and timing of Tibetan Plateau formation are debated, but are critical to understanding tectonic–climatic links. This Review discusses the stages of Tibetan Plateau evolution, and highlights that inherited weaknesses from pre-Cenozoic tectonic events influenced its variable surface uplift history.","PeriodicalId":18921,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","volume":"3 10","pages":"652-667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-022-00318-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

The timing of the initial India–Asia collision and the mechanisms that led to the eventual formation of the high (>5 km) Tibetan Plateau remain enigmatic. In this Review, we describe the spatio-temporal distribution and geodynamic mechanisms of surface uplift in the Tibetan Plateau, based on geologic and palaeo-altimetric constraints. Localized mountain building was initiated during a Cretaceous microcontinent collision event in central Tibet and ocean–continent convergence in southern Tibet. Geological data indicate that India began colliding with Asian-affinity rocks 65–60 million years ago (Ma). High-elevation (>4 km) east–west mountain belts were established in southern and central Tibet by ~55 Ma and ~45 Ma, respectively. These mountain belts were separated by ≤2 km elevation basins centred on the microcontinent suture in central Tibet, until the basins were uplifted further between ~38 and 29 Ma. Basin uplift to ≥4 km elevation was delayed along the India–Asia suture zone until ~20 Ma, along with that in northern Tibet. Delamination and break-off of the subducted Indian and Asian lithosphere were the dominant mechanisms of surface uplift, with spatial variations controlled by inherited lithospheric heterogeneities. Future research should explore why surface uplift along suture zones — the loci of the initial collision — was substantially delayed compared with the time of initial collision. The geodynamic mechanisms and timing of Tibetan Plateau formation are debated, but are critical to understanding tectonic–climatic links. This Review discusses the stages of Tibetan Plateau evolution, and highlights that inherited weaknesses from pre-Cenozoic tectonic events influenced its variable surface uplift history.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青藏高原隆升的时间和机制
印度-亚洲最初碰撞的时间以及导致高(5 千米)青藏高原最终形成的机制仍然是个谜。在这篇综述中,我们根据地质和古高纬度约束条件,描述了青藏高原地表隆起的时空分布和地球动力机制。在白垩纪西藏中部的微大陆碰撞事件和西藏南部的海洋-大陆汇聚过程中,开始了局部的造山运动。地质数据表明,印度在距今 6,500 万至 6,000 万年前开始与亚洲亲缘岩石发生碰撞。藏南和藏中分别在距今约 5500 万年和约 4500 万年前形成了东西走向的高海拔(4 千米)山地带。这些山带被以西藏中部微大陆缝为中心的海拔≤2 km的盆地分隔开来,直到盆地在〜38至〜29 Ma之间进一步隆起。沿印度-亚洲缝合带海拔≥4 km的盆地隆起被推迟到〜20 Ma,西藏北部也是如此。俯冲的印度和亚洲岩石圈的分层和断裂是地表隆起的主要机制,其空间变化受继承岩石圈异质性的控制。未来的研究应探讨为什么与初始碰撞的时间相比,缝合带(初始碰撞的位置)沿线的地表隆升大大延迟。青藏高原形成的地球动力学机制和时间尚存争议,但对于理解构造与气候之间的联系至关重要。本综述讨论了青藏高原演化的各个阶段,并强调前新生代构造事件遗留下来的弱点影响了青藏高原多变的地表隆起历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pursuing partnerships to support early-career researchers Heat stress and the labour force Drivers of the global phosphorus cycle over geological time Solid phase extraction to measure B-vitamins in aquatic systems Deep-ocean drilling to explore the hydraulic structure of subduction faults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1