Aircraft sequencing under the uncertainty of the runway occupancy times of arrivals during the backtrack procedure

K. Dönmez
{"title":"Aircraft sequencing under the uncertainty of the runway occupancy times of arrivals during the backtrack procedure","authors":"K. Dönmez","doi":"10.1017/aer.2022.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In some small airports, a parallel taxiway is not built due to space restrictions or financial issues; hence, the runway itself is often used as a taxiway in this type of airport. After touch down, aircraft move to the U-turn area at the end of the runway and turn 180 degrees, then move back to the desired point, such as a gate or the apron, using the runway. The runway is blocked to other arrivals and departures during this process. This process, called backtrack or back-taxi, can result in high delays for both arrivals and departures. Runway occupancy times (ROTs) vary depending on numerous conditions, including pilot performance, weather conditions, aircraft type, etc. Although there are speed restrictions and procedures announced in advance, the actual performance can be uncertain. In addition, most aircraft can make a U-turn as soon as they sufficiently reduce their speed before they reach the U-turn area especially if they are already delayed. These situations bring enormous uncertainties for traffic management at such an airport. Controllers may need help to sequence aircraft, particularly in busy traffic. In this study, a stochastic mathematical model is developed to sequence arrival/departure operations at such an airport considering the ROT uncertainties of arrivals. The objective function of the developed model is determined as the minimisation of the total delay. ROT data was obtained by observing radar tracks of 120 arriving flights. Reasonable ROT scenarios with various probabilities to represent ROT uncertainties were integrated into the mathematical modeling. In addition, two different sequencing approaches are presented as well as the first come first serve (FCFS) approach. As a result, the proposed stochastic approach provides robust sequences applicable for all ROT scenarios with significant delay savings up to an average of 18.4% and 39.5% compared to deterministic and FCFS approaches, respectively.","PeriodicalId":22567,"journal":{"name":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2022.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In some small airports, a parallel taxiway is not built due to space restrictions or financial issues; hence, the runway itself is often used as a taxiway in this type of airport. After touch down, aircraft move to the U-turn area at the end of the runway and turn 180 degrees, then move back to the desired point, such as a gate or the apron, using the runway. The runway is blocked to other arrivals and departures during this process. This process, called backtrack or back-taxi, can result in high delays for both arrivals and departures. Runway occupancy times (ROTs) vary depending on numerous conditions, including pilot performance, weather conditions, aircraft type, etc. Although there are speed restrictions and procedures announced in advance, the actual performance can be uncertain. In addition, most aircraft can make a U-turn as soon as they sufficiently reduce their speed before they reach the U-turn area especially if they are already delayed. These situations bring enormous uncertainties for traffic management at such an airport. Controllers may need help to sequence aircraft, particularly in busy traffic. In this study, a stochastic mathematical model is developed to sequence arrival/departure operations at such an airport considering the ROT uncertainties of arrivals. The objective function of the developed model is determined as the minimisation of the total delay. ROT data was obtained by observing radar tracks of 120 arriving flights. Reasonable ROT scenarios with various probabilities to represent ROT uncertainties were integrated into the mathematical modeling. In addition, two different sequencing approaches are presented as well as the first come first serve (FCFS) approach. As a result, the proposed stochastic approach provides robust sequences applicable for all ROT scenarios with significant delay savings up to an average of 18.4% and 39.5% compared to deterministic and FCFS approaches, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
返航过程中到达跑道占用时间不确定下的飞机排序
在一些小型机场,由于空间限制或资金问题,没有建造平行滑行道;因此,在这种类型的机场,跑道本身经常被用作滑行道。着陆后,飞机移动到跑道末端的u型掉头区域,180度转弯,然后移动到所需的点,如登机口或停机坪,使用跑道。在此过程中,跑道对其他到达和离开的飞机关闭。这一过程被称为返程或返程出租车,可能会导致到达和离开的高度延误。跑道占用时间(rot)取决于许多条件,包括飞行员的表现、天气状况、飞机类型等。虽然有速度限制和提前宣布的程序,但实际性能可能不确定。此外,大多数飞机在到达u型转弯区域之前,特别是在已经延误的情况下,只要充分降低速度,就可以进行u型转弯。这些情况给这样一个机场的交通管理带来了巨大的不确定性。管制员可能需要帮助对飞机进行排序,特别是在繁忙的交通中。在本研究中,考虑到到达的ROT不确定性,建立了一个随机数学模型来对该机场的到达/离开操作进行排序。所开发模型的目标函数确定为总延迟的最小化。ROT数据是通过观察120个到达航班的雷达轨迹获得的。将具有不同概率的合理的ROT情景纳入数学模型,以表示ROT的不确定性。此外,提出了两种不同的测序方法以及先到先得(FCFS)方法。因此,所提出的随机方法提供了适用于所有ROT场景的鲁棒序列,与确定性方法和FCFS方法相比,延迟节省平均分别高达18.4%和39.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spray behaviour of hydro-treated ester fatty acids fuel made from used cooking oil at low injection pressures Visualising flight regimes using self-organising maps A folding wing system for guided ammunitions: mechanism design, manufacturing and real-time results with LQR, LQI, SMC and SOSMC Re-entry vehicle performance analysis under the control of lateral jet Spacecraft attitude control based on generalised dynamic inversion with adaptive neural network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1