Maximum body size among insular Komodo dragon populations covaries with large prey density

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oikos Pub Date : 2006-02-01 DOI:10.1111/J.0030-1299.2006.14371.X
T. Jessop, T. Madsen, J. Sumner, Heru Rudiharto, J. Phillips, C. Ciofi
{"title":"Maximum body size among insular Komodo dragon populations covaries with large prey density","authors":"T. Jessop, T. Madsen, J. Sumner, Heru Rudiharto, J. Phillips, C. Ciofi","doi":"10.1111/J.0030-1299.2006.14371.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study documents variation in maximum body size of Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis) among the four extant island populations in Komodo National Park and compares an indirect measure of deer density, the major prey item for large dragons, to differences in maximum body size among islands. The largest 15% of dragons from the large islands of Komodo and Rinca were significantly longer and heavier than the largest 15% of dragons on the small islands of Gili Motang and Nusa Kode. There was a 33% difference in snout vent length (SVL) between dragons found on Komodo and those found on Gili Motang, with mass varying by more than four-fold. Density of deer pellet groups between islands ranged from 5.86±0.75 groups per transect on Gili Motang to 20.73±1.02 groups per transect on Komodo Island. Maximal dragon SVL and mass was highly positively correlated with this index of deer density. Low prey density on the two small islands could constrain body size via energetic constraints. At present we can not deduce if insular body size variation has arisen through genotypic or phenotypic mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":"33 1","pages":"422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0030-1299.2006.14371.X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

This study documents variation in maximum body size of Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis) among the four extant island populations in Komodo National Park and compares an indirect measure of deer density, the major prey item for large dragons, to differences in maximum body size among islands. The largest 15% of dragons from the large islands of Komodo and Rinca were significantly longer and heavier than the largest 15% of dragons on the small islands of Gili Motang and Nusa Kode. There was a 33% difference in snout vent length (SVL) between dragons found on Komodo and those found on Gili Motang, with mass varying by more than four-fold. Density of deer pellet groups between islands ranged from 5.86±0.75 groups per transect on Gili Motang to 20.73±1.02 groups per transect on Komodo Island. Maximal dragon SVL and mass was highly positively correlated with this index of deer density. Low prey density on the two small islands could constrain body size via energetic constraints. At present we can not deduce if insular body size variation has arisen through genotypic or phenotypic mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岛屿科莫多龙种群的最大体型随猎物密度的增大而变化
本研究记录了科莫多国家公园现存的四个岛屿种群中科莫多龙(Varanus komodoensis)最大体型的差异,并将鹿密度(大型龙的主要猎物)的间接测量结果与岛屿之间最大体型的差异进行了比较。来自科莫多岛和林卡岛的最大的15%的龙比Gili Motang岛和Nusa Kode岛的最大的15%的龙要长得多,重得多。在科莫多岛上发现的龙的口鼻长度(SVL)与在Gili Motang岛上发现的龙的口鼻长度(SVL)相差33%,质量相差超过4倍。岛间鹿群密度从吉利莫塘的5.86±0.75组/样带到科莫多岛的20.73±1.02组/样带。最大龙SVL和质量与鹿密度指数呈高度正相关。两个小岛上的低猎物密度可能会通过能量限制来限制体型。目前我们还不能推断岛体型的变化是通过基因型还是表型机制产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oikos
Oikos 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
152
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.
期刊最新文献
Linking fine‐root diameter across root orders with climatic, biological and edaphic factors in the Northern Hemisphere Do plants respond to multi‐year disturbance rhythms and are we missing the beat? Importance of accounting for imperfect detection of plants in the estimation of population growth rates Landscape structures and stand attributes jointly regulate forest productivity Evolutionary cycles in a model of nestmate recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1