The effects of different weight functions on partial robust M-regression performance: A simulation study

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/03610918.2019.1586926
E. Polat
{"title":"The effects of different weight functions on partial robust M-regression performance: A simulation study","authors":"E. Polat","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2019.1586926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Partial Robust M (PRM) is a partial robust regression estimator using robust M-estimators. The aim of this study is to see the effects of using alternative Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) weight functions instead of Fair weight function used in original robust Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) method PRM, furthermore, is to examine the effects of soft, semi-hard and hard weightings on this algorithm in terms of efficiency, goodness of fit and prediction. Hence, classical SIMPLS, original PRM algorithm using Fair weight function and four alternative PRM algorithms named as PRMBSQR, PRMCHY, PRMHBR, PRMTLWRTH (obtained using Bisquare, Cauchy, Huber and Talworth weight functions) are compared. The simulation results and a real data application show the original PRM and PRMCHY, both of using soft weighting functions, are the leading algorithms in terms of efficiency and prediction for both low and high dimensional data sets in case of moderate outliers existence. However, when the proportion of outliers is getting higher, semi-hard weighting PRMBSQR or a hard weighting PRMTLWRTH could be good alternatives. Moreover, real data application showed that generally original PRM and PRMCHY, PRMBSQR and PRMTLWRTH algorithms have better performances in terms of outlier detection than both PRMHBR and classical SIMPLS algorithms.","PeriodicalId":55240,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"1089 - 1104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1586926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Partial Robust M (PRM) is a partial robust regression estimator using robust M-estimators. The aim of this study is to see the effects of using alternative Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) weight functions instead of Fair weight function used in original robust Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) method PRM, furthermore, is to examine the effects of soft, semi-hard and hard weightings on this algorithm in terms of efficiency, goodness of fit and prediction. Hence, classical SIMPLS, original PRM algorithm using Fair weight function and four alternative PRM algorithms named as PRMBSQR, PRMCHY, PRMHBR, PRMTLWRTH (obtained using Bisquare, Cauchy, Huber and Talworth weight functions) are compared. The simulation results and a real data application show the original PRM and PRMCHY, both of using soft weighting functions, are the leading algorithms in terms of efficiency and prediction for both low and high dimensional data sets in case of moderate outliers existence. However, when the proportion of outliers is getting higher, semi-hard weighting PRMBSQR or a hard weighting PRMTLWRTH could be good alternatives. Moreover, real data application showed that generally original PRM and PRMCHY, PRMBSQR and PRMTLWRTH algorithms have better performances in terms of outlier detection than both PRMHBR and classical SIMPLS algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同权函数对部分稳健m -回归性能影响的模拟研究
部分鲁棒M (PRM)是利用鲁棒M估计量的部分鲁棒回归估计。本研究的目的是观察使用替代迭代重加权最小二乘(IRLS)权函数代替原稳健偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)方法PRM中使用的公平权函数的效果,进一步研究软、半硬和硬加权对该算法在效率、拟合优度和预测方面的影响。因此,比较了经典SIMPLS、使用Fair权函数的原始PRM算法以及使用bissquared、Cauchy、Huber和Talworth权函数获得的PRMBSQR、PRMCHY、PRMHBR、PRMTLWRTH四种可选PRM算法。仿真结果和实际数据应用表明,采用软加权函数的原始PRM和PRMCHY算法在低维和高维数据集存在中等离群值的情况下,在效率和预测方面都是领先的算法。然而,当离群值的比例越来越高时,半硬加权PRMBSQR或硬加权PRMTLWRTH可能是较好的选择。此外,实际数据应用表明,总体而言,原始PRM和PRMCHY、PRMBSQR和PRMTLWRTH算法在异常点检测方面优于PRMHBR和经典SIMPLS算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Simulation and Computation series intends to publish papers that make theoretical and methodological advances relating to computational aspects of Probability and Statistics. Simulational assessment and comparison of the performance of statistical and probabilistic methods will also be considered for publication. Papers stressing graphical methods, resampling and other computationally intensive methods will be particularly relevant. In addition, special issues dedicated to a specific topic of current interest will also be published in this series periodically, providing an exhaustive and up-to-date review of that topic to the readership.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian variable selection for logistic regression with a differentially misclassified binary covariate. Statistical methods for assessing treatment effects on ordinal outcomes using observational data. Sampling Spiked Wishart Eigenvalues. Automated Parameter Selection in Singular Spectrum Analysis for Time Series Analysis. Adjusted curves for clustered survival and competing risks data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1