Energy and Exergy Balances for Modern Diesel and Gasoline Engines

G. Bourhis, P. Leduc
{"title":"Energy and Exergy Balances for Modern Diesel and Gasoline Engines","authors":"G. Bourhis, P. Leduc","doi":"10.2516/OGST/2009051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim is here to evaluate the difference between the energy and exergy (or available energy) balances when heat recovery is considered in an internal combustion engine. In the first case, the entropy of the system is not taken into account so that, the maximum useful work recoverable from a system can not be estimated. Then, the second case is much more adapted to estimate heat recovery potential. In this paper, two modern engines are evaluated. First, an up-to-date gasoline engine: three-cylinder, downsized, low friction, then a modern common rail downsized Diesel engine. For each one, two energy and exergy balances are given for two different part-load operating points representative of the NEDC cycle using experimental data from steady state engine test benches. For the Diesel engine, it is shown that effective work represents around 30% and that around 55% of the energy introduced into the combustion chamber is lost (in the form of heat), especially in exhaust gas, in water coolant and oil. But when considering exergy balance, only 12% of the total exergy introduced through the fuel can be recovered, in order to produce useful work. Expecting a 25% exergy recovery efficiency, the effective engine efficiency could be increased by 10%. For the gasoline engine, the increase of the output work could be around 15%.","PeriodicalId":19444,"journal":{"name":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2516/OGST/2009051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The aim is here to evaluate the difference between the energy and exergy (or available energy) balances when heat recovery is considered in an internal combustion engine. In the first case, the entropy of the system is not taken into account so that, the maximum useful work recoverable from a system can not be estimated. Then, the second case is much more adapted to estimate heat recovery potential. In this paper, two modern engines are evaluated. First, an up-to-date gasoline engine: three-cylinder, downsized, low friction, then a modern common rail downsized Diesel engine. For each one, two energy and exergy balances are given for two different part-load operating points representative of the NEDC cycle using experimental data from steady state engine test benches. For the Diesel engine, it is shown that effective work represents around 30% and that around 55% of the energy introduced into the combustion chamber is lost (in the form of heat), especially in exhaust gas, in water coolant and oil. But when considering exergy balance, only 12% of the total exergy introduced through the fuel can be recovered, in order to produce useful work. Expecting a 25% exergy recovery efficiency, the effective engine efficiency could be increased by 10%. For the gasoline engine, the increase of the output work could be around 15%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代柴油和汽油发动机的能量和火用平衡
这里的目的是评估在内燃机中考虑热回收时能量和能(或可用能量)平衡之间的差异。在第一种情况下,由于没有考虑系统的熵,因此无法估计系统可恢复的最大有用功。然后,第二种情况更适合于估计热回收潜力。本文对两种现代发动机进行了评价。首先是一台最新的汽油发动机:三缸、小型化、低摩擦,然后是一台现代化的共轨小型化柴油发动机。对于每一种平衡,使用稳态发动机试验台的实验数据,给出了代表NEDC循环的两个不同部分负荷工作点的两个能量和火用平衡。对于柴油发动机,研究表明,有效功约占30%,大约55%的能量以热量的形式进入燃烧室,特别是在废气,水冷却剂和油中损失。但当考虑到火用平衡时,通过燃料引入的总火用中只有12%可以回收,以产生有用的功。预计25%的火用回收效率,发动机的有效效率可提高10%。对于汽油发动机,输出功的增加可以达到15%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of geomechanical effects during SAGD process in a meander belt Flow Simulation Using Local Grid Refinements to Model Laminated Reservoirs Correlating Stochastically Distributed Reservoir Heterogeneities with Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Production Efficient estimation of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) solution viscosity for enhanced oil recovery process by polymer flooding Investigation of Asphaltene Adsorption onto Zeolite Beta Nanoparticles to Reduce Asphaltene Deposition in a Silica Sand Pack
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1