Impoliteness Strategies in Trevor Noah’s Afraid of The Dark Stand-up Comedy Show

IF 0.6 Q3 LINGUISTICS Mental Lexicon Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.22146/LEXICON.V7I2.66571
A. Hafisa, Sharifah Hanidar
{"title":"Impoliteness Strategies in Trevor Noah’s Afraid of The Dark Stand-up Comedy Show","authors":"A. Hafisa, Sharifah Hanidar","doi":"10.22146/LEXICON.V7I2.66571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on identifying the impoliteness strategies and explaining the purposes of the most frequently used strategy in Afraid of the Dark stand-up comedy show performed by Trevor Noah. The data of this research are Trevor Noah’s utterances which contains impoliteness strategies. The analysis was based on the impoliteness strategies theory proposed by Jonathan Culpeper (1996). The result of this research shows that Trevor Noah uses 105 instances of impoliteness strategies which cover all five types of strategies proposed by Culpeper; bald on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm or mock politeness, and withhold politeness. Based on the findings, negative impoliteness is found to be the most frequently used strategy. It occurs 42 times or with a percentage of 40% of the whole data. This high frequency of negative impoliteness strategy is used to entertain the audience. Trevor Noah mostly used ‘condescend, scorn, or ridicule’ sub-strategies of negative impoliteness intended to amuse and entertain the audience and also to induce laughter when hearing one being ridiculed or disparaged.","PeriodicalId":45215,"journal":{"name":"Mental Lexicon","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Lexicon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/LEXICON.V7I2.66571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research focuses on identifying the impoliteness strategies and explaining the purposes of the most frequently used strategy in Afraid of the Dark stand-up comedy show performed by Trevor Noah. The data of this research are Trevor Noah’s utterances which contains impoliteness strategies. The analysis was based on the impoliteness strategies theory proposed by Jonathan Culpeper (1996). The result of this research shows that Trevor Noah uses 105 instances of impoliteness strategies which cover all five types of strategies proposed by Culpeper; bald on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm or mock politeness, and withhold politeness. Based on the findings, negative impoliteness is found to be the most frequently used strategy. It occurs 42 times or with a percentage of 40% of the whole data. This high frequency of negative impoliteness strategy is used to entertain the audience. Trevor Noah mostly used ‘condescend, scorn, or ridicule’ sub-strategies of negative impoliteness intended to amuse and entertain the audience and also to induce laughter when hearing one being ridiculed or disparaged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特雷弗·诺亚的《害怕黑暗的单口喜剧》中的不礼貌策略
本研究的重点是识别不礼貌策略,并解释在特雷弗·诺亚表演的《怕黑》中最常用的不礼貌策略的目的。本研究的数据是Trevor Noah的话语,其中包含不礼貌策略。该分析基于Jonathan Culpeper(1996)提出的不礼貌策略理论。研究结果表明,Trevor Noah使用了105个不礼貌策略实例,涵盖了Culpeper提出的所有五种策略类型;秃顶记录的不礼貌,积极的不礼貌,消极的不礼貌,讽刺或嘲笑的礼貌,和隐瞒的礼貌。根据调查结果,消极不礼貌是最常用的策略。它出现了42次,占整个数据的40%。这种高频率的消极不礼貌策略是用来娱乐观众的。特雷弗·诺亚主要使用“屈尊、蔑视或嘲笑”的消极不礼貌的子策略,旨在娱乐和娱乐观众,也引起笑声,当听到一个人被嘲笑或贬低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Lexicon
Mental Lexicon LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Mental Lexicon is an interdisciplinary journal that provides an international forum for research that bears on the issues of the representation and processing of words in the mind and brain. We encourage both the submission of original research and reviews of significant new developments in the understanding of the mental lexicon. The journal publishes work that includes, but is not limited to the following: Models of the representation of words in the mind Computational models of lexical access and production Experimental investigations of lexical processing Neurolinguistic studies of lexical impairment. Functional neuroimaging and lexical representation in the brain Lexical development across the lifespan Lexical processing in second language acquisition The bilingual mental lexicon Lexical and morphological structure across languages Formal models of lexical structure Corpus research on the lexicon New experimental paradigms and statistical techniques for mental lexicon research.
期刊最新文献
Explorations of morphological structure in distributional space Long-lag repetition priming in natural text reading Native and foreign language orthotactic probability and neighborhood density in word learning The cognate continuum Mimetic Reading of J.K. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy: A Political Critique of the United Kingdom’s 2010 General Election Through the Analysis of Children Characters’ Sufferings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1