Evangelical Christian Crisis Responses to Same-Sex Sex Scandals

IF 0.9 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2018.1463717
Cylor Spaulding
{"title":"Evangelical Christian Crisis Responses to Same-Sex Sex Scandals","authors":"Cylor Spaulding","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2018.1463717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research examines the crisis responses of four evangelical leaders (Paul Crouch, Ted Haggard, Lonnie Latham, and Eddie Long) involved in same-sex sex scandals by comparing their responses against those recommended by the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT). Using a quasi-case study approach to add context and richness to the SCCT, this research examined the leaders’ strategies and the response to them and found that the evangelical pastors generally adhered to the recommended strategies of the SCCT, thus reinforcing the broad applicability of the SCCT when handling a crisis, even in a religious context. Despite reinforcing the validity of the SCCT, this article also recommends the inclusion of additional categorical considerations for the SCCT for situations where a crisis inflicts spiritual or emotional harm, particularly for crises occurring in a religious environment.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"26 1","pages":"28 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2018.1463717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research examines the crisis responses of four evangelical leaders (Paul Crouch, Ted Haggard, Lonnie Latham, and Eddie Long) involved in same-sex sex scandals by comparing their responses against those recommended by the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT). Using a quasi-case study approach to add context and richness to the SCCT, this research examined the leaders’ strategies and the response to them and found that the evangelical pastors generally adhered to the recommended strategies of the SCCT, thus reinforcing the broad applicability of the SCCT when handling a crisis, even in a religious context. Despite reinforcing the validity of the SCCT, this article also recommends the inclusion of additional categorical considerations for the SCCT for situations where a crisis inflicts spiritual or emotional harm, particularly for crises occurring in a religious environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福音派基督徒对同性性丑闻的危机回应
摘要本研究考察了四位福音派领袖(保罗·克劳奇、泰德·哈格德、朗尼·莱瑟姆和埃迪·朗)在同性性丑闻中的危机反应,并将他们的反应与情境危机沟通理论(SCCT)推荐的反应进行了比较。本研究采用准个案研究的方法,为SCCT增加了背景和丰富性,研究了领袖的策略和对策略的反应,发现福音派牧师普遍遵守SCCT推荐的策略,从而增强了SCCT在处理危机时的广泛适用性,即使在宗教背景下也是如此。尽管加强了SCCT的有效性,本文还建议在危机造成精神或情感伤害的情况下,特别是在宗教环境中发生的危机,在SCCT中纳入额外的分类考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1