{"title":"Benchmarking SSD-Based Lustre File System Configurations","authors":"Rick Mohr, Paul Peltz","doi":"10.1145/2616498.2616544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to recent development efforts, ZFS on Linux is now a viable alternative to the traditional ldiskfs backend used for production Lustre file systems. Certain ZFS features, such as copy-on-write, make it even more appealing for systems utilizing SSD storage. To compare the relative benefits of ZFS and ldiskfs for SSD-based Lustre file systems, a systematic bottom-up benchmarking effort was undertaken utilizing Beacon, a Cray CS300-AC™ Cluster located at the University of Tennessee's Application Acceleration Center of Excellence (AACE). The Beacon cluster contains I/O nodes configured with Intel SSD drives to be deployed as a Lustre file system. Benchmark tests were run at all layers (SSD block device, RAID, ldiskfs/ZFS, Lustre) to measure performance as well as scaling behavior. We discuss the benchmark methodology used for performance testing and present results from a subset of these benchmarks. Anomalous I/O behavior discovered during the course of the benchmarking is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":93364,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of XSEDE16 : Diversity, Big Data, and Science at Scale : July 17-21, 2016, Intercontinental Miami Hotel, Miami, Florida, USA. Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (5th : 2016 : Miami, Fla.)","volume":"11 1","pages":"32:1-32:2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of XSEDE16 : Diversity, Big Data, and Science at Scale : July 17-21, 2016, Intercontinental Miami Hotel, Miami, Florida, USA. Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (5th : 2016 : Miami, Fla.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2616498.2616544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Due to recent development efforts, ZFS on Linux is now a viable alternative to the traditional ldiskfs backend used for production Lustre file systems. Certain ZFS features, such as copy-on-write, make it even more appealing for systems utilizing SSD storage. To compare the relative benefits of ZFS and ldiskfs for SSD-based Lustre file systems, a systematic bottom-up benchmarking effort was undertaken utilizing Beacon, a Cray CS300-AC™ Cluster located at the University of Tennessee's Application Acceleration Center of Excellence (AACE). The Beacon cluster contains I/O nodes configured with Intel SSD drives to be deployed as a Lustre file system. Benchmark tests were run at all layers (SSD block device, RAID, ldiskfs/ZFS, Lustre) to measure performance as well as scaling behavior. We discuss the benchmark methodology used for performance testing and present results from a subset of these benchmarks. Anomalous I/O behavior discovered during the course of the benchmarking is also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ssd的Lustre文件系统配置基准测试
由于最近的开发工作,Linux上的ZFS现在是用于生产Lustre文件系统的传统ldiskfs后端的可行替代方案。ZFS的某些特性,比如写时复制,使得它对使用SSD存储的系统更有吸引力。为了比较ZFS和ldiskfs对于基于ssd的Lustre文件系统的相对优势,我们利用Beacon(位于田纳西大学应用加速卓越中心(AACE)的Cray CS300-AC™集群)进行了系统的自下而上的基准测试。Beacon集群包含配置了Intel SSD硬盘的I/O节点,将作为Lustre文件系统部署。在所有层(SSD块设备、RAID、ldiskfs/ZFS、Lustre)上运行基准测试,以测量性能和伸缩行为。我们讨论了用于性能测试的基准测试方法,并给出了这些基准测试的一个子集的结果。还讨论了在基准测试过程中发现的异常I/O行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CloudBridge: a Simple Cross-Cloud Python Library. pbsacct: A Workload Analysis System for PBS-Based HPC Systems ECSS Experience: Particle Tracing Reinvented Fast, Low-Memory Algorithm for Construction of Nanosecond Level Snapshots of Financial Markets Benchmarking SSD-Based Lustre File System Configurations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1