Evaluation of the Performance of Locally Developed Combine Equipment Used for Several Agricultural Operations at Once

Shaimaa Sami Dowad, Abdulrazzak Abdullatif Jasim
{"title":"Evaluation of the Performance of Locally Developed Combine Equipment Used for Several Agricultural Operations at Once","authors":"Shaimaa Sami Dowad, Abdulrazzak Abdullatif Jasim","doi":"10.52951/dasj.23150110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of locally developed combine equipment used for several agricultural operations at once in a silt clay loam soil texture. Three factors were used. The first is the forward speed of the machinery unit, with three speeds: of 2.98, 4.37, and 6.18 km h-1, the second is plowing depths, with three plowing depths and subsurface irrigation pipes of 10/20, 15/25, 20/30 cm, the third is the distances between the subsurface irrigation pipes, with three distances of 50, 60 and 70 cm. The field efficiency of the combine equipment, soil moisture content, soil penetration resistance and soil bulk density were studied. Faltra tractor was used as a power source with a power of 88 kW (120 hp), with the combine equipment. The results showed that the speed of 6.18 km h-1 was significantly higher in obtaining the highest field efficiency. While the speed of 2.98 km.h-1 was outperformed in obtaining the highest value for soil moisture content, the lowest soil penetration resistance and the lowest soil bulk density compared to the other speeds. The depth of plowing and subsurface irrigation pipes 10/20 cm outperformed in obtaining the highest field efficiency, the highest moisture content, the least soil resistance to penetration, and the lowest soil bulk density compared to other depths. The distance of 70 cm was significantly outperformed in obtaining the highest field efficiency, the highest value of moisture content, the least soil resistance to penetration, and the lowest bulk density compared to other distances. The treatment of speed 2.98 km.h-1, depth 10/20 cm, and distance 70 cm outperformed in obtaining the highest moisture content of 19.40%, the lowest soil penetration resistance of 2.42 kg.cm-2, and the lowest soil bulk density of 0.93 μg.m-3 compared to other treatments.","PeriodicalId":11234,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal","volume":"192 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52951/dasj.23150110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of locally developed combine equipment used for several agricultural operations at once in a silt clay loam soil texture. Three factors were used. The first is the forward speed of the machinery unit, with three speeds: of 2.98, 4.37, and 6.18 km h-1, the second is plowing depths, with three plowing depths and subsurface irrigation pipes of 10/20, 15/25, 20/30 cm, the third is the distances between the subsurface irrigation pipes, with three distances of 50, 60 and 70 cm. The field efficiency of the combine equipment, soil moisture content, soil penetration resistance and soil bulk density were studied. Faltra tractor was used as a power source with a power of 88 kW (120 hp), with the combine equipment. The results showed that the speed of 6.18 km h-1 was significantly higher in obtaining the highest field efficiency. While the speed of 2.98 km.h-1 was outperformed in obtaining the highest value for soil moisture content, the lowest soil penetration resistance and the lowest soil bulk density compared to the other speeds. The depth of plowing and subsurface irrigation pipes 10/20 cm outperformed in obtaining the highest field efficiency, the highest moisture content, the least soil resistance to penetration, and the lowest soil bulk density compared to other depths. The distance of 70 cm was significantly outperformed in obtaining the highest field efficiency, the highest value of moisture content, the least soil resistance to penetration, and the lowest bulk density compared to other distances. The treatment of speed 2.98 km.h-1, depth 10/20 cm, and distance 70 cm outperformed in obtaining the highest moisture content of 19.40%, the lowest soil penetration resistance of 2.42 kg.cm-2, and the lowest soil bulk density of 0.93 μg.m-3 compared to other treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时用于多种农业作业的国产联合收割机的性能评价
通过田间试验,评价了我国自行研制的联合收割机在粉质粘壤土中同时进行多种农业作业的性能。使用了三个因素。一是机械单元前进速度,有2.98、4.37、6.18 km h-1三种速度;二是耕作深度,有三种耕作深度和10/ 20cm、15/ 25cm、20/ 30cm的地下灌溉管;三是地下灌溉管之间的距离,有50、60、70 cm三种距离。研究了联合收割机的田间效率、土壤含水量、土壤抗渗透能力和土壤容重。Faltra拖拉机作为88千瓦(120马力)的动力源,与联合收割机一起使用。结果表明,6.18 km h-1的速度可以获得最高的场效率。而2.98 km.h-1速度的土壤含水量最大值、渗透阻力最小、容重最小均优于其他速度。10/20 cm耕层和地下灌管深度的田间效率最高,土壤含水量最高,土壤抗渗透能力最小,土壤容重最低。与其他距离相比,70 cm的田间效率最高,土壤含水量最高,土壤抗渗透能力最低,容重最低。速度2.98 km.h-1、深度10/20 cm、距离70 cm处理的土壤含水率最高为19.40%,土壤渗透阻力最低为2.42 kg。土壤容重最低为0.93 μg。M-3与其他处理相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived Effects of Climate Variability on the Rice Farmers in Niger State, Nigeria The Reality of the Usage of Extension Methods by Workers in Agricultural Extension: A review Monthly Ecological Dynamics and Their Influence on the Prevalence and Species Richness of Dactylogyrus (Monogenea) Parasites in Fishes of the Lesser Zab Riv Effect of Compaction Energy on Selected Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Soils Amended With Different Sources of Organic Matter Diastase Enzyme activity and Hydroxymethylfurfural production during thermal processing of honey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1